The success of architects is defined not so much by the problems they face as the act of their creative and practical responses.
Located in once the bombarded Berlin, a new language of architecture emerged. It appears with multiple contradictions, yet not confliction, from itself to the surroundings and within its own construction. That is the Berlin Jewish Museum, submitted by the young Daniel Libeskind in a competition to provoke the unsavory history of Berlin very soon after the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. The Western tradition in building museum is twisted by its expressionistic form, not merely to house the remains, the relics, the display of art, it stands by itself naked, untreated to house the ghost of German Judaism, a rare opportunity to visit an empty building for its such high profile budget. The challenge is to excavate the memory that was already there but suppressed by the medium of contemporary architecture, uncanny. This essay is to analyze the capturing of a spiritual existence from a part of the bygone Berlin, and the museum’s capacity to address one of the most profoundly tragic events of the twentieth century, the Holocaust, in the use of light, material, and structural methods of construction. Moreover, this study is an attempt to evaluate the Libeskind’s response to the concept to reveal the implication in its shape, and its spatial quality. This project is also a chance to examine the interdisciplinary character of architecture in combining social-cultural relationship, psychology, history, theory, music, material methodology, vision, etc. To be able to do that, the architect’s background and his operations of process to the problem will be shortly studied, then his solution in dealing with the res...
... middle of paper ...
...f structure, a museum. The one contradiction in the contemporary design theory that Libeskind dares to fight is that to work in the upcoming century means to work with reduced means. His works pose optimism in the sense that architecture, if filled with a satisfactory amount of reasoning, and justification with the help of the advancement in material technology, and the foremost, creativity, will be able to address the profound of any project seeking for poetic embodiment. While modern architects have tried hard to eradicate the traces of history from the forms, postmodern architects like Liberskind would embody the traces of history in between the forms. In Lisbeskind’s Jewish Museum, the invisibility, the implication, and the embodiment come first, then the advancement of material methodology assists the build of the visibility, and the physical infrastructure.
“The architect’s role and their intellectual responsibility is to fight to maintain their vision and little bits get chopped off all the time, but if they’re only little bits, it’s not too bad.’’
Preservation of modern architecture is unique in its own way and adds a whole different dimension of preserving old buildings. The vast difference in the materials of construction from the traditional ones, the complexity involving preservation and renovation adds to the diversification of preservation. It is not just the difficulties in preserving but the indifference towards the modernist buildings which is the major factor for the neglect. “For all the talk of technical difficulties, in reality it is the unpopularity of modernism that is often the greatest challenge for advocates of postwar architectural preservation” (While 2007, 649)
In the article of “Exhibiting Intention: Some Preconditions of the Visual Display of Culturally Purposeful Objects”, the author, Michael Baxandall mainly discussed interrelationship within the group of three agents upon their influence and reflect of the artifacts in the museum, and the understanding of culture elements behind the display. In the first part of this paper, I will identify the points of view of the author. In the second part, I will analyze the layout of the gallery, “Imagining the Underground” in Earth Matters in Fowler Museum in UCLA. Several discussion related to the settings of the museum and the article will be discussed interactively. In general, this paper tries to show the robustness and the weakness of Baxandall’s model, which will specified.
Duncan’s (1991) analysis of western museums is defined through the theme of “durable objects” as a criterion to judge the heritage of American and European art as a ritual of the modern state. In this manner western art museums are built like “temples” as a symbolic and figurative representation of greatness of western culture throughout the world: “[They] are more like the traditional ceremonial monuments that museum buildings often emulate—classical temples” (Duncan 90). This interpretation of American/European museums defines a dominant source of cultural heritage that ritualizes
Throughout history, the human race has had to go through many horrible things. Famines, diseases, and war have always been present where there are people. However, a great thing about people is that we try to learn from our mistakes. The Holocaust was a horrible time in history and it should not be forgotten. The individuals involved in this experience went through awful things and it is crucial that people learn about this harsh time. In order to prevent a massacre like this from ever happening again, we must continue to teach future generations about the severity of this time. Remembering and memorializing the Holocaust by Holocaust Museums, Holocaust Ceremonies, and Holocaust victims are great ways because each of them support and keep the Holocaust in our thoughts.
The Holocaust is one of the worst events that had happened and has affected many people. Many articles have been written about the Holocaust in both subjective and objective ways. When the Holocaust is expressed in an objective way, it informs the reader about facts that had happened. On the other hand, when the Holocaust is expressed in an subjective way, it informs the reader more about the writer’s opinion and is most likely to have their perspective. The article, “The Holocaust Museum” is a subjective and objective article that involves facts and perspectives.
By means of comic illustration and parody, Art Spiegelman wrote a graphic novel about the lives of his parents, Vladek and Anja, before and during the Holocaust. Spiegelman’s Maus Volumes I and II delves into the emotional struggle he faced as a result of his father’s failure to recover from the trauma he suffered during the Holocaust. In the novel, Vladek’s inability to cope with the horrors he faced while imprisoned, along with his wife’s tragic death, causes him to become emotionally detached from his son, Art. Consequently, Vladek hinders Art’s emotional growth. However, Art overcomes the emotional trauma his father instilled in him through his writing.
However, when designing the exterior of the building Libeskind moves away from past ideals seen in the Jewish museum where he uses indexicality to communicate meaning. The Crystal Extension and other projects such as the Denver Museum suggest that the symbolic predominates over the indexical and diagrammatic nature of his earlier work. This new work then becomes
What is the most important event in history? That is a question that no matter what the answer is, it is debatable. What's not debatable is the devastation caused by Hitler's rein. No matter if it is the most important event in history or not, the holocaust is something that had a very large impact on the world. Hitler is responsible several subjects taught in history classes from elementary school, up into college. The horrible events he set into action caused widespread devastation across nations. There are many components to the Holocaust that changed history: Hitler's rise, his extermination of millions of people, and the aftermath.
The building’s main purpose is to display exhibitions in the Netherlands. The building was built by OMA and consists of a large space approximately 3,300 square meters. The large space gives the gallery the ability to host multiple exhibitions at the same time and therefore attract more viewers. Many people view this gallery as a museum; however it is not necessarily just that. Unlike other museums, Kunsthal’s goal is to combine the art and exhibitions with education. It offers high-quality showings and is closely intertwined with institutions nearby. The Kunsthal offers learning programs as well as research opportunities. The most incredible thing about the building is how it was built. Koolhaas stayed loyal to the materials he finds interesting especially when combined together into one space. The walls are made from “unfinished concrete and corrugated, or ridged, plastic; metal grids serve as the floor; and tree trunk are used as pillars.” Koolhaas enjoys using inexpensive materials and resources that would not commonly be used when creating a larger gallery such as this one. His desire to use materials such as tree trunks, plastic, and concrete is similar to the techniques and fundamentals of the Bauhaus. The Bauhaus’s main goal is to stick to simplicity and use common fundamentals to create something more than what is seen at first glance. The school
London, Phaidon, 1997. Watkin, David. German Architecture and the Classical Ideal. Cambridge, MIT Press 1987. Rosenblum and Janson.
The German Pavilion, more commonly known as the Barcelona Pavilion, is one of the most recognizable buildings of the modern period during the early 20th century. It encapsulates every element of modern architecture in one structure. Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, one of the fathers of modern architecture, was the architect of this beautiful building. In this essay I will explore how Mies impacted the modern movement in architecture through his groundbreaking ideas using the Barcelona Pavilion as a case study.
architecture to just the designing of buildings. He feels that architecture involves more than just
Meijenfeldt, E. V., and Geluk, M. 2003. Below ground level: creating new spaces for contemporary architecture. Birkhauser
The Russian Revolution energized the artists to expand their social influence to produce statements that could inspire human aspirations. Rodchenko and El Lissitzky approached their avant-garde art practice in visually similar ways, but theoretically they varied considerably. Victor Margolin (1997) explored the two artists’ principal approaches to building their art and their commitment to the political influences of the time within his first essay in The Struggle for Utopia. Rodchenko felt the objects produced should ‘both facilitate change in people, making them more ideally Soviet, as well as represent Soviet ideals through their materials and construction’. Both artists sought to design architectural structures. Rodchenko was a Constructivist who strove to produce new, functional, material objects. His designs were not constructed around aesthetics; they were intended to be a catalyst for social change. Works like The Fut...