This current event essay is on the destruction of are rainforests. How they are doing and why. Also what are the affects on the economy it can have. Which is pretty bad, but helpful to some people. These people are called shifted cultivators. There are pretty big cause, but we'll get into that. Then at the end what can an average person do to help this cause. If we keep deforesting rainforest and soon cut down all the trees then we will be in danger of losing our only natural source of clean air. The event, well there's many not just one problem. It happens all the time. Loggers coming in and cutting down trees, it happens all the time. However, do they care? No, they just want money. Therefore, they keep on cutting more and …show more content…
Now the company leaves and these people called shifted cultivators move in. These people are farmers that were kicked off there land by the government that go into the newly cut logging site and make cash crops. The destruction these people have on the woods may even be worse. So to live they come in and cut some trees down. Make a temporal house and use the rest for fire wood. So they cut down as many trees they want and use them. They take there seeds make the crops fast and then make another crop. Soon, the soil will not be good for farming any more because they planted so fast. This also causes erosion that ruins the landscape, soil, and some times goes into water and kills the animals in the water. Another way erosion occurs is when they make large dams they uproot trees with silt that the ground needs to stay firm and then the ground can't hold the water which led to earthquakes. Than after that the environmental damage causes more damage because of the pollution. Miners are pretty bad too. They come in destroy trees and the ground and then they use these big heavy machinery that causes lots of pollution from its exhausts that does damage to the environment. …show more content…
The effects would probably be pretty different. Supply and demand, if we stop cutting down the amount of trees we do than the loggers would want more money and then the selling prices would go up really high and we the people use trees for a lot of reasons. Than only big companies could buy it and make things with it and sell there things. Small businesses that use wood would go out of business. It would be a monopoly, if you have the money you have the control over that business. It would be like the times with Rockefeller but it would be legal because these companies didn't do anything to make the prices go up higher for wood. It's bad for the earth to cut that amount of trees but it could also be bad for are economy (The CAUSES of RAINFOREST
A good view the Truax had was that for every tree cut down, 5 more are planted. It is a fact that newer trees give off more air than older trees, so cutting down the older trees
When the "new" management took over Pacific Lumber the process of "selective cutting" was abandoned and "clear cutting" was adopted. Although "clear cutting" is a way to obtain so-called fast cash, it wa...
there are only stumps? This is the result of clear-cut logging. The negative aspects of
for milling before they are sold back to the United States at a higher price. Not only does the public lose money in this process but it costs Americans a number of jobs in the market. On the other hand, agencies have made efforts to prevent it. deforestation. Members of the Forest Service educate not only the large companies, but the private landowners as well.
Once forests began to be viewed as beneficial, it opened up a whole new lifestyle. The forests and nature might have been an evil and scary place, but it was a place filled with resources and opportunity. Settlers began using trees and wood in a plethora of ways. Not only was it used for families own use, many began logging forests as a business; a very profitable business at that. Once wood started being used for beneficial purposes, a snowball effect occurred by the settlers to cut down every tree in sight and turn it into a profit.
As destruction of the rainforest continues, man slowly paves the inevitable path to a clear end. It has been known that the rainforest is an essential provider for the balance of the mother earth and that it acts as a key for life as we know it. Yet, the world still decides to quietly watch the disappearance. In fact, most people realize what exactly is taking place. But however, instead of trying to aid in the termination of this disaster. They place this into the back of their ignorant little minds thinking that it will not directly effect them. Every day the removal continues, it actually occurs extremely fast and at a pace of 80 acres per minute. That means at 80 acres per minute with 60 minutes per hour and 24 hours a day, there is a loss of approximately 115,000 acres a day. This is an exorbitant amount forest loss in one day meaning that at this pace hastened by the roadrunner ethics, that the forest will not have a place in the environment for very long. The fact is that now is the time to voice your opinion before and act it is too late.
As long as humans have lived in forested areas, they have cut down trees for lumber and/or to clear space for agricultural purposes. However, this practice has resulted in the destruction and near extinction of our national forests. Today, fewer than five percent of our country's original forests remain (Thirteen) and the U.S. Forest Service continues to allow more than 136,000 square miles to be logged each year (Byrant). Even more alarming, is the fact that only twenty percent of the current public forest lands are permanently protected by law, leaving nearly eighty percent to be consumed by chainsaws and bulldozers (Heritage...).
He caused irreparable damage to the environment, and therefore, his business. If the Onceler planted as many trees as cut down or at least a fraction of the trees that he cut down, he would continue to be in business. This isn’t uncommon: businesses often exploit natural resources to make sure that competitors can’t exploit it. This is a slightly altered example of game theory. In this case, the Nash equilibrium is at a point unfavorable to society and less favorable to the business.
In August 2002, President Bush launched his revolutionary campaign against wildfires known as the Healthy Forest Initiative (HFI). The President’s dynamic plan centers on preventing massive forest fires by thinning the dense undergrowth and brush commonly seen in our national forests. The thinning will occur in priority areas that are in close proximity to homes and watersheds. The Healthy Forest Initiative also aims at developing a more efficient response method to disease and insect infestations that sabotage our forests. Finally, if fully enacted, the Healthy Forest Initiative would provide the loggers with what is known as “goods for services”. This will compensate the loggers for the financial burden that will surface as a result of this aggressive thinning (http://www.sierraclub. org/forests /fires/healthyforests initiative.asp). In order to promote the progress of his Healthy Forest Initiative, in 2003 President Bush announced the Healthy Forest Restoration Act. This act took the main issues discussed in the Healthy Forest Initiative a step further. Bush plans to make a collaborative effort with federal, state, tribal, and local officials to protect our woodlands against future infernos. The act also calls for more public participation in reviewing any actions taken in lieu of the Healthy Forest Initiative. Furthermore, Bush wants to restore the land that has already been destroyed by wildfires and help to recover the threatened and endangered species that were affected by the fires (http://www.
“In addition to being places of magnificent beauty, the old growth forests of the world represent hundreds of years of life on this planet, and many of the trees are the tallest living things on the planet (Old Growth Forests, 2004).” Because of their size, these trees, and the forests they reside in, are targeted by logging companies such as Weyerhaeuser as highly profitable areas that provide supposed economical benefits to surrounding communities in the way of new jobs.
Deforestation is a widely used term, but one with different meanings. Disturbance deforestation refers to all man made disturbances that alter a forest, these are the most common. This argumentative essay discusses the positive and negative aspects of deforestation. In the first part of the essay the pro arguments of deforestation will be discussed. For example, the issue of Global population and how forests are being used, land use and the ways forests contribute, wood use, forest growth, destruction and the reasons for cutting down the trees. The second half of the essay will cover the issues that are harmful to the environment because of deforestation. Many environmental issues take place everyday; a big question that arises, is if the global economy will ever finds middle on the issue of forest thinning. If deforestation was used only in the most crucial of times, the world might become a better place.
Taking wood from rainforests and old-growth forests is detrimental to the environment and society. However, it is possible for us to have sustainable wood if we make an effort.
centuries. Today with an increasing population the amount of wood available has declined seriously in recent decades. People have been harvesting wood to cultivate land, burn, and for the use of raw materials for industry (Urquhart 2014). The estimated amount of deforestation taking place is twenty million hectares per year (Urquhart 2014). Climate change and global warming are just a few of the problems associated with the degradation of our forests.
The single biggest direct cause of tropical deforestation is conversion to cropland and pasture, mostly for subsistence, which is growing crops or raising livestock to meet daily needs. The conversion to agricultural land usually results from multiple direct factors. For example, countries build roads into remote areas to improve overland transportation of goods. The road development itself causes a limited amount of deforestation. But roads also provide entry to previously inaccessible—and often unclaimed—land. Logging, both legal and illegal, often follows road expansion (and in some cases is the reason for the road expansion). When loggers have harvested an area’s valuable timber, they move on. The roads and the logged areas become a magnet for settlers—farmers and ranchers who slash and burn the remaining forest for cropland or cattle pasture, completing the deforestation chain that began with road building. In other cases, forests that have been degraded by logging become fire-prone and are eventually deforested by repeated accidental fires from adjacent farms or pastures.
Timber and especially hardwoods like mahogany and ebony are being felled at an alarming rate to satisfy the needs of the swiftly developing world. Another problem for the forest areas of the world is the type of agriculture used by some peasant farmers known as "slash & burn". This method of farming involves the burning of trees to add to the initial supply of nutrients in the soil. Over time this supply slowly wares down and so the farmer once again moves onto another plot of trees to slash and burn.