Curious About the Toulmin Model?

813 Words2 Pages

Do you know how to use the Toulmin model when writing an argumentative paper? After reading this essay you will not only know how to use the Toulmin model, but also how to use it effectively. The model is relatively easy to use and it can help one to organize his or her paper. James Q. Wilson is one of many writers that utilizes the Toulmin model. In Wilson’s piece, “Just Take Away Their Guns,” it is clear that he chose to use the Toulmin model as a guideline for the organization of the work. I will be walking you through the steps of the Toulmin model in the following paragraphs.
The Toulmin model begins by making a claim. The claim is the main idea of the paper. In other words, the claim is one’s argument. Wilson’s claim states that while there should be more gun control laws, they will not work (Wilson 125). Wilson does not state his claim straight forward. Readers have to read critically to understand what Wilson is claiming. This may be hard for those who do not possess good critical reading skills. Following the claim one must next include his or her stated reasons. The stated reasons are the reasons that one takes the position he or she does on the argument topic. In an argumentative paper there can be a numerous amount of stated reasons. The number of stated reasons in an essay all depends on the writer. Wilson chose to include two stated reasons. His first stated reason as to why more gun controls will not work is, “Legal restraints on the lawful purchase of guns will have little effect on the illegal use of guns” (Wilson 125). Wilson was very straight forward with his first stated reason. His second stated reason was stated differently. Readers would again have to read critically to figure out his second stated reason...

... middle of paper ...

...Not quite” (Wilson 127). This is a prime example of the conditions of rebuttal used in Wilson’s essay. This is considered a condition of rebuttal because Wilson addresses an objection to his argument, then immediately goes on to state why this objection is invalid. When writing an argumentative essay one must always consider a qualifier. The qualifier limits arguments. There is no qualifier in the essay, “Just Take Away Their Guns,” by James Q. Wilson. All in all, James Q. Wilson wrote a relatively good paper based using the Toulmin model. I hope I was able to successfully explain the Toulmin model to those reading.

Works Cited

Wilson, James Q. “Just Take Away Their Guns.” Current Issues and Enduring Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking and Argument, with Readings. Ed. Sylvan Barnet and Hugo Bedau. 10th ed. Boston:Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2014. 125-28. Print.

Show More
Related

  • The Rogerian Model Of Extreme Parenting

    257 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Rogerian model is a diplomatic mode of argumentation that can be used in writing to present a problem and offer a solution to a specific issue. When reading an essay that follows the Rogerian outline, it is easier to understand what the writer is trying to persuade and argue, because it states the problem and shows why the issue needs to be addressed. Then it proposes the opponent's position and validates grants whatever validity the writer finds in the opposition's perspective. For example, the writer may acknowledge certain situations in which the opponent's position can be acceptable. The Rogerian outline could be helpful and used to enhance an argument. A writer might argue that extreme parenting is counterproductive for a child, because

    Read More

  • Thomas Paine and Patrick Henry during the 1770s

    815 Words  | 2 Pages

    Through the accompaniment of rhetorical devices and pathos, one can strengthen his or her argument to the point where others see no other option. When spoken at the right occasions and with enough of supporting evidence, an argument will enrapture the audience and make people find your argument logical and appealing. Patrick Henry made his speech less than a month before the American Revolution took place. Thomas Paine began a series of articles when the call for men to fight against the British was urgent. When someone makes and argument, even the smallest detail counts.

    Read More

  • Two Critiques

    788 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are many examples of strong argumentative writing in the second half of the book Everyday Arguments. Topics of writing examples include today’s college student, the internet, sports, earning your living, diet, and reading popular culture. Of the writings, two stood out as notable works to be critiqued; Who is a Teacher, and Thoughts on Facebook.

    Read More

  • Gun Legislation

    1005 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...lation. In all actuality, gun legislation is a serious issue and through this essay, a reader would simply believe that the gun legislation is fine and does not need to be stronger. Although he gives personal examples throughout the essay, other examples would enforce that there should be stronger gun legislation and that guns actually cause harm. Other examples would also make Verhulst's essay stronger and show that other people are just as weak as he is, and reader's would have a stronger belief that gun legislation is too weak. His examples alone promote guns and do not prevent them because the examples glorify his weakness to yield to the temptation. Although he believes that the causes of his weakness and other peoples' weakness is because of emotions that triumph over reason, a stronger and bolder person for stronger gun legislation would have self-control.

    Read More

  • An Analysis of the Rhetorical Elements of Political Campaign Advertisements

    1054 Words  | 3 Pages

    Ramage, John D., John C. Bean, and June Johnson. Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with Readings. 9th ed. Boston: Pearson Education, 2012. Print.

    Read More

  • Examples Of Deliberative Argument

    361 Words  | 1 Pages

    In arguments there are three major types of classifications, forensic, deliberative, and epideictic. An example of a forensic argument would be the article “The Assassination in Israel That Worked” by Roger Cohen for the New York Times. “Arguing For and Against Genetic Engineering” by Chris Seck for the Stanford Review, and “Crowd Fill Washington For Inauguration” by Carol Morello, Allison Klein, and Donna St. George for the Washington Post are great examples of deliberative and epideictic arguments, respectively. I will examine the article by Chris Seck, specifically for it’s qualifications of a deliberative argument.

    Read More

  • Gun Control Is Not Enough

    1327 Words  | 3 Pages

    Crusius, Timothy W., and Carolyn E. Channell. The Aims of Argument: A Text and Reader. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2003. Print.

    Read More

  • Homosexual and Religion

    1058 Words  | 3 Pages

    White, Fred D., Simone J. Billings. The Well-Crafted Argument: A Guide and Reader. Boston: Houghton, 2002.

    Read More

  • Is Television Ruining America?

    970 Words  | 2 Pages

    Muller, G.H. and Wiener, H.S. (2009). To the point: Reading and writing short arguments. New York: Pearson Education, Inc

    Read More

  • 'The Birth Of Monsters' By Daniel Cohen's Argument?

    1360 Words  | 3 Pages

    For most writers, we must know the different types of argumentation styles along with logical fallacies. There are three main types of argumentation styles including: Aristotelian, Rogerian, and Toulmin. All three styles have their own argumentation spin on arguments. Aristotelian refutes the opposing claim while at the same time promoting its own argument by using supporting evidence. Some of that evidence includes using rhetorical appeals such as ethos, logos, and pathos. A Rogerian arguments are the arguments that find the common ground in order for an effective argument. Last but not least there is the Toulmin argument, the Toulmin argument is similar to the Aristotelian argument yet instead of appealing to the audience Toulmin focuses

    Read More

  • Toulmin Model Argument Analysis

    1023 Words  | 3 Pages

    When talking about an argument, it should be written in a manner that unfolds both the strengths and limits of the argument. The point of an argument is to come to a conclusion as close to the truth or realistic solution. In the twentieth-century, British philosopher Stephen Toulmin asked the question of where is the love and what are the uses of an argument. Stephen Toulmin then conducted a method constructing and analyzing an argument. This method, named after Stephen Toulmin, is called the Toulmin model. The Toulmin model involves breaking down an argument into six basic parts, looking at all supporting points and views both for and against the argument.

    Read More

  • Society Must Redefine the Meaning of Family

    1195 Words  | 3 Pages

    * The Aims of Argument. 4th ed Ed.Timothy W. Crusius and Carolyn E. Channell. New York:McGraw Hill,2003, 352-355.

    Read More

  • Gun Control Does NOT Reduce Crime

    2312 Words  | 5 Pages

    Crime rate has steadily lowered as more guns enter the private market. There is no single answer to end the debate on gun control. Many variables must be examined, but the evidence presented cannot be ignored. Gun control does not end violence, but makes the law-abiding citizens more vulnerable. In the 1878 Arkansas case of Wilson v. State, a judge stated, “Common sense dictates that inanimate objects, such as guns, are not responsible for human behavior.

    Read More

  • Reflective Argument Analysis

    1375 Words  | 3 Pages

    Wilhoit (2009) explains building an argument is a complex task that does not require adhering to a specific rules and methods prescribed to you throughout your high school career. Although they certainly have a place in arguments in that they provide the infrastructure, the key premised to building an academic argument is understanding and establishing the rhetorical situation. It will give you an understanding of who the writer and the audience is, what is the subject or topic, the reason or occasion and finally the purpose of why the argument it being written (p.1-4). In this essay we will take a step by step look at how to construct a reflective argument in response to Michael Hardt’s “Are we capable of Democracy” argument in Examined Life.

    Read More

  • Reflective Essay About English Class

    758 Words  | 2 Pages

    However, while writing the argumentative essay, it took much more than just asking myself a simple question. Since the topics of my body paragraphs were so diverse, I was forced to work harder at picturing the connections between all three of them. While I knew writing the process essay was difficult, when I began writing the argumentative essay, I knew it was going to be much more challenging. Nevertheless, after the paper was finally complete, my ability of writing transitional sentences was increasingly better due to the difficulty. Furthermore, I never would have examined so closely how to relate the ideas of college athletes’ monetary compensation to lawsuits being filed over disputes of unfairness (“Paying College Athletes” 3). Not only did the process essay help further my knowledge of transitional sentences, but the argumentative pushed it to the next

    Read More

More about Curious About the Toulmin Model?

Open Document