Cultural Identity: The Supervisory Relationship

608 Words2 Pages

supervisor, supervisee, and client which impact counseling and supervision. Crutchfield et al. (2001) states cultural identity influences individuals “perceptions of the world, communication styles, interpretations of experiences, selection of goals, and ways of working towards our chosen goals” (p. 147-148). The supervisor disclosing their cultural identity to the supervisee is encouraged early in the supervision relationship (Crutchfield et al., 2001). Hardy (2016) suggests the supervisor encourage the supervisee to identify their location of self (self-identified cultural identity). The purpose of this is to explore the impact of varying cultural identities upon the supervisory relationship. Cultural identity is often neglected in counseling and supervision leading to the neglect of a significant aspect of a person’s experience. The neglect of cultural identity leaves all parties …show more content…

Holloway & Neufelt (1995) state that basic counseling skills are learned quickly by CITs, however, conceptualization and clinical judgment developments more slowly and is greatly supported by dyadic supervision. As the semester progressed, I came to the awareness, as my supervisees developed further professionally, showing strength in basic skills, conceptualization, and clinical judgment, that the next great leap as CITs were to bring their personhood into the room.. I felt as the that I believe my experiences as a supervisee allowed for my personhood in the supervisory relationship. This provided an environment for optimal growth as professional. As the skills of my supervisees progressed this semester, I increasingly focused on emphasizing bringing their personhood into the counseling session, while modeling this in supervision. In encouraging a CIT to bring themselves into session it is first necessarily to teach the student to trust themselves, or as I continually emphasized “trusting your

Open Document