Dating back to the year 1800, photography has been used to capture and encrypt parts of history worldwide. These records can be used to serve as memories or even for analyzation for future progression of society. Changing day-by-day, it is one of the most desired aspects of technology. People tend to go after products with the best image capturing capability such as phones. Photography makes yesterday seem like today and today look like tomorrow. Differences that can not be expressed in words, can be clearly depicted with the help of photography. The use of photoshop in photography must remain an intricate part of society because it allows communities to establish a common mode of communication worldwide, it can be manipulated and edited to …show more content…
In the article “Emotion experience and regulation in China and the United States…” the author discusses the results of an experiment conducted that tested to see the differences in the perceptual views among two different societies. The study tested the emotional response of American and Chinese men and women to certain images. The results revealed showed that there was about a 10% difference in negative emotion intensity between the representatives of the two ethnicities (Davis et al. 1). Americans who experienced the highest intensity show that we, in westernized societies feel more free to express our views and morals compared to the strict and contained eastern ideals (Davis et al. 6). The extent to which these little yet so impactful differences display on the significance of photography is that it portrays the distinction of mindsets that are raised in different environments. Photography can be interpreted in many ways as it is one of the more ambiguous forms of rhetoric that we see in our everyday lives. Another sole influence of photoshop is that it depicts the everyday lives of iconic figures in our global history and allows us to compare those figures with others worldwide. In the article “Behind the Lens of History” Walsh describes how images of people like former president John F. Kennedy and his family help depict a positive image of himself and helps promotes his image as a man who is just to be man to control and guide our country’s well-being(Walsh 4). President Obama was well-known for his coordination and willingness to work with his cheid photography Pete Souza. Walsh states Obama understood the effect of displaying a positive of himself as our nation’s leader (Walsh 5). Because of this, the chief photographer, Souza “made White House photoshop more high tech… than ever before as he was the first to fully to utilize social media to connect the
In the early 1800s a young French inventor, by the name of Nicéphore Niépce, began to perfect the science of modern, camera photography. From “selfies” with Pope Francis, to Eddie Adams famous, Vietnam era photograph of Nguyễn Ngọc Loan executing Nguyễn Văn Lém . Photography has revolutionized the way that we communicate to each other; the world has not been the same since. When used candidly, the camera’s innate ability to capture the world it sees accurate is skewed only by the the person controlling its direction.
In the essay “Why We Take Pictures” by Susan Sontag, she argues that taking photos can be a tool of power and sometimes even a defense against anxiety(353). Taking pictures can be a great source of power, according to Sontag. The photographer has the power to show what they want and people can choose whether or not to be in the photo. Sontag uses the example of a family photo; as some family photos portray the family being happy, many people cannot see that the family might not actually be as happy as they look. Sontag also uses examples like nuclear families and traveling in order to enforce her claims about picture taking. In a nuclear family, Sontag believes that taking a picture of that family can help relieve some anxiety because people
In the field of academia, ethnographic studies are often overlooked as a serious source and reviewed as literature for the mass populace. Because of the often common language, fluid writing styles, format, and production of typical ethnographies, it is much more appealing and attainable to popular culture than the research within a scholarly journal or anthology. Although, perhaps instead of deeming ethnographic work unworthy of a scholarly title due to the appeal it possess, historians should relish in this relativity new form of research for its popularity. Ethnographic studies provide readers with a rare and untarnished micro historic view of the customs of a particular culture or individuals within said culture. Opposing most academia, these studies can sometimes be void in political agenda and personal biases, providing the audience with more objective material. Ethnographies often allow readers to see private and intimate moments within the milieu of the subject which is not often reserved for public life, which is the typically sphere of scholarly study; because of this tendency, individuals and groups which lack a strong public voice are frequently the foci of ethnographic studies. Throughout history women have often been the victims of such marginalization, with a recent focus on Eastern and Islamic women. Considering the previous, Muslim women and gender have been the center of contemporary ethnographic studies, giving a voice to non-Westernized Muslim women and providing a natural research of gender relations with little bias or political agenda.
I am very religious and a huge believer in God, since childhood. My grandma has played a big role making me religious person. I remember in my childhood my grandma used to take me to the temple with her every day. From that time, I am attached very strongly toward the god. There was temple close to my house in India. I used to go to temple with my grandma two times a day morning and evening. These two times in temple saints (Hindu monks) do the “Aarti” (Aarti is waving lighted wicks before the sacred images to infuse the flames with the Deities’ love, energy, and blessings). “Aarti” means get rid of the darkness from life.
To complete the above fieldwork exercise, the method of qualitative research utilised was Ethnography. Ethnography is a method in which the ethnographer or researcher becomes either an overt or a covert participant in the lives of people (Hammersley & Atkinson, 2105). It involves collecting any data that is available to explore the focus of the research (Hammersley & Atkinson, 2007). One could suggest Ethnography is a method to study society and culture (Berg and Lune, 2017).
Recently, one of the most famous photographer get involved into the “Photoshop scandal”. The scandal begins at a show in Italy. One Italian photographer find out an obvious manipulation on Steve’s print. The sign on the road was moved, otherwise it may block the man’s leg. Even though Steve McCurry deleted the origin photo on his blog, people and publications across the Web quickly began digging to see what other McCurry images they could find that had been seriously altered. (1) The result turns out several other photos also have such manipulations. Hence, a hot topic has been discussed a lot lately: Whether should we use Photoshop for photos. After tons of research, I believe that allow to use Photoshop for photos will definitely
Photography is defined at the art or practice of taking and processing photographs. To understand photography is having insight or good judgment to know how to take the picture, but also edit it if need be. Does photography limit our understanding of the world? What some people haven’t realized is that photography is all around us, whether it is in the person’s mind to see it or not. While we see photography throughout our daily routine, people dismiss the small types of photography and focus on the bigger sceneries like other countries beautiful cities and landscapes. It’s true that in this day and age, most photographs we see have been altered in some way. When photographers use Photoshop to edit our photos, we use many different ways to make that image appealing to the eye. Although, photographers unless told to do so will not change an image into something totally absurd that takes away from being astatically pleasing. Images are a gateway to the insight of the rest of the world’s cultures landscapes, and architecture, and photography is the key aspect to it. Photography is a one way to see the world, but it is better if you go and travel around the world to see it. In order to see if photography actually limits our understanding, we have to first look at the positive side of photography.
Throughout the recent years, Photoshop has become a widespread phenomenon amongst the world. With the rapidly developing inventions of camera’s and devices with cameras on them; posting pictures on social media has become extremely popular. Along with that, the pressure to appear perfect in said pictures has increased dramatically. Society has become exceedingly focused on the idea of perfect, and what perfect looks like. Especially now, with growing photo sharing phone applications such as Instagram, photo editing is becoming even more popular. Photoshop has proven to have many beneficial uses; however, it also has very negative consequences such as false perceptions, and misleading people.
Photography was first utilized over 100 years ago in an attempt to preserve life as it existed before the industrial revolution. Over time photography has gradually corrupted memory in a variety of ways, despite its original intention to preserve it. From there, photography has evolved to become a pressing threat not only to memory, but also to consciousness.
Roland Barthes believed that there were two components to understanding the characteristics of photography, one being the studium and the other being the punctum. The studium being what is recognized right away and defined by broad cultural meaning and the punctum being what pierces the studium and evokes an unpredictable personal response. Michael Fried believed that digital photography removed any possibility for an experience of punctum. In Michael Fried’s 2005 essay Barthes Punctum, Fried defends the idea that punctum can only exist without intent from the creator. He insists that in digital photography its maker puts the contents of the photograph there, therefore removing any chance of experiencing punctum. In response, James Elkin believed that nothing in a digital photograph threatened the punctum. In this essay, I will argue that digital photography does not impair the possibilit...
However, times have changed and we are now in the 21st century, an era where mobile camera phones and wearable cameras are inseparable from modern society. Long gone are the days where film had to be chemically treated in a darkroom; with digital cameras now boasting an instant print feature where one can send photographs to their home printer with a click of a button. In an era where digital technology has catapulted the photography industry far beyond the wildest imaginations of Sontag 's time, one would ponder whether Sontag 's analysis still holds true.
... impact of a photo illustration on an audience is far more powerful than a description through words. "Modern imaging technologies have given us new and powerful ways of handling photographs." (Ang T, 2000) Professional journalists have altered mass-mediated photos for reasons from tabloid sensationalism to political correctness. This is due to the fact that they believe the alterations are obvious enough to be instantly recognisable or so minor as to be ethically insignificant. Whatever the case is, the misuse of imaging technologies causes photo illustrations to loss its credibility and objectivity, thus destroying the status of photojournalism. As emphasised earlier, photography itself is a manipulation from its beginnings, this process of manipulation is further enhanced by imaging technologies. Hence, photojournalism cannot be claimed to be neutral and objective.
The question of how society will function when all checks that a few thousand years of civilization have imposed have disappeared has yet to be answered. Society has been trained to view photographs as representations of Reality, but digital imaging has quickly tossed that mindset aside. The underlying Problem results in questioning of everyday events such as, the ability to look at a Photo and trust that the images we see are truly representative of the situation.
Photography is an essence of preserving life without tempering its might. It’s an art that embodies the existence of one’s perspective which may influence one’s sight to see the world because beholders might look at the very same picture but see an entirely different image.
Presently, photography has transformed into a social rite that is widely practiced by masses as a part of their daily lives. People preserve their memories on a photosensitive film through their lens (images) and convert them subsequently into the form of images (camera). They credit these images as they do believe that the pictures will exist in immortality even though the event has ended, whereas the aging brains will drain their memories away. These pictures remember every single little thing, long after they have forgotten everything. Agreeing with Susan Sontag's idea in her essay entitled “On Photography,” “The omnipresence of cameras persuasively suggests that time consists of interesting events, events worth photographing” (311), N. Scott Momaday, Babbette Hines, and Jim Nachtwey say that people depend on cameras to chronicle the priceless moments occurring in their lives. The question is, do all photographic images always portray the truth?