Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What are the differences in islam and hinduism
What are the differences in islam and hinduism
Comparison between hinduism and islam
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What are the differences in islam and hinduism
The difference between hindu and muslim was pointed out first time by Alberoni : the historian in his travel noted when he visited india with mehmood ghaznavi he writes:
“Hindu are different from the muslim in all respects. They (hindus) hate every nation (muslim)who do not accept their belief and call them maleeh(impure) with hatred and avoid every kind of contract with them whether it is intermarriages sitting or eating because they (hindus) think that they will become bhrusht(impure)”
It is evident that our culture is not separated from our life and religion. With the advent of islam in the sub-continent, the muslim over here choose to lead their on the basis of islam. The muslim and hindus were separate in every aspect. This can be understood from the fact that their clothing ,living and religious festival are completely different, Inspite of living together for centuries, this cultural difference never finished .Quaid-e-Azam once said
“An idea of the magnitude of our cultural difference can be understood from the fact that, a cow is halal for muslim, Whereas the hindus worship it”.
This cultural difference made It clear that the hindus and the muslim were separate nations on religious grounds. When the muslim were governing the sub-continent, clashes between hindus and muslim were negilible inspite of the difference but during the british rule, this difference became very apparent.
The evolution of the two nation theory in india has a very old historical background. Quaid-e-Azam had said that,
“Pakistan started the movement the first non-muslim was converted to islam in India long before the muslim established their rule……. throughout the ages hindus had remained muslims and they had not merged their entities –that ...
... middle of paper ...
...m would not help us in settings uo a workable economic order. We should evolve an economic system based on Islamic concept of justice and equality.”
ISLAMIC DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM:
During the struggle for Pakistan, a question arose that what sort of system would be an impose in the new state.Quaid-e-Azam answered it as
“WE have not demanded pakistan to get a mere piece of land but our aim is to achieve such a laboratory where we can test Islam’s social justice”.
In other words Quaid-e-Azam made it clear that since we have set out to achieve an Islamic democratic way.
CREATION OF PAKISTAN (1947):
The struggle under the dynamic leadership of Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah ultimately bore fruit. The sub-continent was divided and Pakistan was created as a sovereign and independent state on 14th august 1947. Quaid-e-Azam became the first governer general of Pakistan.
One of his current works is trying to create an Islamic democracy unlike the US or Europe that focuses on “fairness, justice, equality, unity, and charity” (The Week Staff).
Edin, Peter. "1947 the Birth of India & Pakistan." New York Times Up Front. 30 Jan 2012: 16-
Hinduism and Christianity are two religions that have been around for thousands of years. Both of these religions have developed many philosophies on different aspects that can be compared to show their similarities and differences. The Hindu and Christian religion agree on many things. Based on humanity, our society follows some of the rules also because of the religion and laws. From the holy literature, there have been many different concepts that have been pledged but they all are supposed to lead you to the same effects such as a happy, healthy life, contribution to the world around us humans, and some kind of freedom after death. Some of the main subjects that can be reflected upon after learning of the history and fundamentals of these religions are the paths to enlightenment and/or salvation, the style of treating women through religions aspects, and the afterlife. This paper will give an analytic comparison of these two religions relating to the topics.
...ernment of India Act was passed in 1935 granting self-rile in India and democratic political reforms. However, as India got closer to independence, Hindus and Muslims began to disagree on government but in 1947 independence was granted. Immediately after independence India was split into two different nations, Pakistan, which had a majority of Muslim, and East Pakistan (“The End of Imperialism & Colonialism”).
Over the course of the last century, the Islamic Republic of Iran (formerly known as Persia) has seen colonialism, the end of a dynasty, the installation of a government by a foreign power, and just over three decades ago, the popular uprising and a cleric-led revolution. These events preceded what could be considered the world’s first Islamic state, as politics and fundamentalist religion are inextricably linked in contemporary Iran. Looking at Iran from the mid 1940’s until the present day, one can trace the path that led to the rise of fundamental Islam in Iran in three distinct periods. The first is that which began with the rise of secular nationalism and the decline of Islam. In the second, the secular, western-friendly government eventually gave way to the Islamic revival in the form of a government takeover by hard-line clerics and disillusioned, fundamentalist youth; both motivated and led by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. Rule of Iran by these fundamentalist clerics then led to the formation of the fundamentalist Islamic theocracy that governs present-day Iran. The current government has some democratic appearances, but all real power is in the hands of the supreme leader, an Ayatollah who is chosen by the Assembly of Experts, a group of clerics chosen by the Guardian Council. With the Iranian Revolution, political Islam was born, with the fundamentalists holding the reins of power in Iran to the present day.
National unity and ideology are the major political concerns in post colonial societies, that is why they used to apply assimilation strategy. This strategy is applied by the dominant groups. These groups might not hesitate to use state force in their own favour. So the state’s policies favour the powerful and dominant group. Pakistan is also one of the examples of plural societies. Here the state used to adopt assimilation policies to create national unity. Resultantly, the state has lost its Eastern Part. Still, various ethnic groups off and on show their resentment and different ethno nationalist movements are in the struggle to preserve identity. Following table is also helpful to show how the state of Pakistan
The culture of India is very unique, beautiful, and one of the oldest ones. The culture of India is very diverse. Take the north and south regions of India, they are totally different. Indian festivals are put into categories by their color, gaiety, enthusiasm, prayers, an rituals. India’s culture is very beautiful, colorful, and magical. It is also very original. Indian’s culture is the true meaning of amazing and graceful. (“Indian Culture.” WhereInCity)
Hinduism and Christianity are two religions that have been around for thousands of years. These religions have developed philosophies on certain subjects that can be compared in order to show their similarities and differences. Some of the main subjects that can be reflected upon are the paths to enlightenment or salvation, the religions' treatment of women, and the concept of the afterlife. This paper will give an analytic comparison of these religions through the discussion of these topics.
India has a characteristic of more ethnic and religious groups than most countries in the world. Despite this multiplicity of religions, there exists a broad group of interrelated traditions called Hinduism. Although other religions within the nation such as Islam, Buddhism, and Christianity have occasionally challenged its dominance, Hinduism is the most prevalent religion in the South Asian region. Some of the outstanding differences between Hinduism and other denominatio...
The Mughal Empire took place in what is now present day Pakistan and India. Hindus were a large majority in this empire. The emperor, Abu Akbar, who ruled from 1556 to 1605 accepted the world of polytheistic multicultural world. Hindus under this empire at this time weren’t attacked as they were prior to Akbar’s rule. Hindu war prisoners were released and converted to Islam. Hindu scho...
India is the center of a very serious problem in the world today. It’s a very diverse place with people from many different religious backgrounds, who speak many different languages and come from many different regions. They are also separated economically. Two of the country’s religious sects, Muslims and Hindus, have been in conflict for hundreds of years. Their feelings of mistrust and hatred for each other are embedded in all those years and will not leave easily. What’s most disturbing is that there seems to be no plan for reconciliation available. There are numerous reasons for this conflict.
During the Cold War, many regional conflicts occurred and were noted as the significant battles which later led to decolonization. One of the regional conflicts were India and Pakistan fighting for their independence. In 1947, India was released under Great Britain’s control and gained its independence. However, the country was divided between Muslims and Hindus, which share different religions. Muslims wanted church and state to become unified while Hindus wanted a separation of these two establishments. Since these two ethnic groups disagreed, it was difficult to create a new government. Therefore, India was divided into two nations: India for the Hindus and Pakistan for the Muslims. Hindus and Muslims were racing to the border in order to get to their nation state which led to killing 500,000 people due to rioting. Although, Mohandas Gandhi, an Indian National Congressman, wanted to obtain peace between these two religions. Pakistan refused the H...
Whether the partition of these countries was wise and whether it was done too soon is still under debate. Even the imposition of an official boundary has not stopped conflict between them. Boundary issues, left unresolved by the British, have caused two wars and continuing strife between India and Pakistan.
We can start by recounting history, where the roots of the conflict lie. India was one massive nation made up of several states, ruled by the British. A long and difficult independence struggle culminated with the British choosing to leave India in August 1947. The Muslims of the land decided that instead of just a Free India, they would create a Free Pakistan for themselves as well. They were fearful that as a minority, the Hindu majority would trample their rights and religion. Both countries would be formed as soon as the British handed back control in August. The rulers of each individual state constituting India would chose which country to join, hopefully following the wishes of its people. This idea was fraught with problems. There were quite a few states that had a majority of one religion yet the ruler belonged to another faith. The states of Hyderabad and Junagarh were examples of this. Both had Hindu majorities and M...
...ted the title of Governor-General rather than Prime Minister, which underlined ties to the inherited autocratic British vice regal system. Both of them also died before the formation of the Pakistani Constitution in 1956, and without clarifying their vision for Pakistan. Their deaths created a leadership vacuum and political frenzy within the Pakistani government (Jaffrelot 2011). Pakistan’s ruling elite did not have the same levels of popular mandate and structure as Congress had within India. The Muslim League was made up of culturally migrant-Indian political elites who lacked the grassroots prestige of “Indian revolutionaries” such as Gandhi and Nehru (Darby 2013). Pakistan took eight years to resolve issues on national language, religion’s role within state, and federal structures by which time a quasi-coup and rigged-elections had taken place (Oldenburg 2010).