Critique of the Opening of In a Free State by V.S. Naipul

773 Words2 Pages

Critique of the Opening of In a Free State by V.S. Naipul

Though many of poets and authors are purged by a notion to do

something about the world's dire conditions that they write about,

they don't. They complain and rave about in their texts, bringing out

the morbid atmosphere of the place, but they know that owe their

inspiration to those very conditions; without them, the stimulation to

narrate powerful texts such as the tramp at Piraeus could have never

arisen. V.S. Naipaul illustrates his journey from Piraeus to

Alexandria in a morose tone and gloomy language. Most texts written

about a journey have elaborate details about its natural surroundings,

but this extract indulges more into the 'dingy' steamer itself and its

passengers. He takes an insight into understanding his fellow

passengers, especially the tramp. Using these techniques, V.S. Naipaul

has produced an influential and forlorn text.

The text is written from the view of the first person, allowing the

reader to feel more involved with the text - "as soon as I saw the

dingy little Greek Steamer I felt I ought to have made other

arrangements". We see the whole journey from his point of view, thus

our views of the situation and characters are based solely on his

opinion. This personal approach lets the reader indulge into the

extract on a more personal level. The narrator seems to be a wealthy

person, hence being able to get tickets on the upper part of the ship,

and this allows the situation to be seen through the critical eye of

the middle/upper class; "We on the upper…on the lower deck didn't"

Naipaul creates a melancholic, moody and suffocating atmosphere, using

...

... middle of paper ...

...¦..the Australians".

The liability of what the tramp says is extremely questionable. He

seems to be living out his fantasies through these illustrations,

going to places that he has never been to through his imaginative

conversation to the Yugoslav. Despite his convincing words, the tramp

seems to remain unfulfilled; 'it was mechanical, without conviction,

even the vanity made no impression; those quivering wet eyes remained

distant'. The tramp seems almost lost, with no roots, and no where to

go to.

Naipaul explores the steamer through the overwhelming number of

passengers that it carries. He seems to look at the people in a

cynical way, bringing out the morbid feelings that the steamer

invokes. The most memorable character in the extract is certainly the

tramp, who Naipaul both mocks and has compassion towards.

Open Document