Criticism In Native Son, By Richard Wright

2111 Words5 Pages

Before discussing Jan Erlone and Boris Max, the communists in the novel, it should be known that Richard Wright was a member of the Communist Party when he wrote Native Son. Wright used these two characters in the novel along to support the movement and make it look more positive. This, along with other things to be included later, was very controversial and generated much criticism for the novel. The communist characters turn out to be the most supportive and helpful towards Bigger. Jan Erlone is Mary Dalton’s boyfriend and is quite similar to her at the beginning of the novel. He contributes to Bigger feeling afraid and ashamed as well as tries to force communism upon him. After murdering Mary, Bigger attempts to frame Jan for the crime. …show more content…

The article by Jack L. Nelson and Valerie Ooka Pang discusses racism in the North and South. Racism in the South was far harsher than the North, yet the North was still pretty bad. There was no escaping it, many African American’s believed escaping to the North would solve many problems but in reality, it did not. This is because racist thoughts will always exist, due to this behavior will always be affected. They may punish racist people now but that does not prevent it from causing problems (Nelson & Pang, 2006). Paul Kivel, the author of How White People Can Serve as Allies to People of Color in the Struggle to End Racism, says that being an ally to end racism is one of the most important things a person can do. Racism is frozen and motile (Frisina, 2016). Meaning it will always be present. Even though people change and time changes, some problems never fully just disappear. Kivel states that there is no correct way to be an ally and whites should team up with colored people to end racism. He mentions that time changes circumstances and what is a priority today may not be tomorrow. People of color need support in order to end the struggle of racism and other injustices. Racism is a big part of this country’s culture and it always will be. If no one ever takes a stand to stop it, then how can we assume …show more content…

He has a dissociation with his emotions and does not have a sense of guilt when he does something wrong. He is fearful of the whites and this fear causes him to hate them. Olympia Duhart, the author of A Native Son’s Defense: Bigger Thomas and Diminished Capacity, wrote that Bigger would meet elements of the diminished capacity doctrine. Diminished capacity is not an insanity defense, but maybe more of a justification of Bigger’s actions in the moment when he killed Mary. In the moment, his judgement was failed him and he faced an emotional and mental disturbance. Duhart states that Bigger’s social surrounding is likely the cause for is lapse of judgement. This would also explain why Bigger was not remorseful after killing Mary. The environment he was living his basically desensitized him and filled him with anger. It is not just murder because it has a deeper more symbolic reason for its occurrence. Mary mad Bigger afraid an ashamed, whites in general made him fearful and angry. Mary Dalton told Bigger she wanted to help him, she wanted to tears down the wall between the two races. Wright wrote, “she responded to him as if he were human, as if he lived in the same world as she. And he had never felt that before in a white person. But why? Was this some kind of game?” This quote from Native Son shows Bigger’s confused response towards Mary and also the distrust he has towards

Open Document