Miroslav Volf's Exclusion And Embrace

763 Words2 Pages

In his book, Exclusion and Embrace, Miroslav Volf explores the interesting theology surrounding human identity, the other, and embrace. In order to figure out the issue of exclusion, and the reconciliation, that according to Volf, can only be found in God's embrace, Volf gets down to the root of humanity, exploring ideas of human identity. Volf's introduction, labelled “The Cross, The Self, and The Other”, shows us the original problem of self identity and foreign 'otherness' that, for example, “explains why 'tribal' identity is today asserting itself as a powerful force”1. Using Jurgen Moltmann's idea of “self-giving”2, Volf outlines his arguments in the following chapters and gives us an outline of his own theology and biblical usage. In …show more content…

As history shows, with the Holocaust in Europe and Moses' whole story in the Bible about how the Jewish people were Egyptian slaves, people respond badly to “other” populations that may have a higher hand. Volf uses the example of Cain and Abel to explain how “otherness” is seen as a threat to their identity. The story of Cain and Abel shows how Cain saw himself as better than his brother, and God taking Abel's offering instead, Cain's identity became threatened as his status quo was flipped. Cain's identity is being threatened, so as long as Abel's around Cain is no longer the superior brother. Volf claims that “every human being is potentially Cain and Abel, Cain's envy and murder do not prefigure how 'they' behave in distinction to 'us', but how all human beings tend to behave toward others”4. Chapter 2, “Exclusion”, Volf mentions how 'inclusion' has failed to counter evil, and then he “[makes] a distinction between differentiation and exclusion”5, claiming that differentiation is unavoidable, while exclusion is meant to be violent in its “expulsion, assimilation, or subjugation and [it's] indifference of abandonment [that] replace the dynamics of taking in and keeping out as well as the mutuality of giving and …show more content…

Volf even calls for the oppressed to forgive their oppressors and for both oppressed and oppressors to respond to Jesus' call for repentance: “It will not do to divide Jesus' listeners neatly into two groups and claim that for the oppressed repentance means new hope whereas for the oppressors it means radical change....victims need to repent because social change that corresponds to the vision of God's reign – God's new world- cannot take place without a change of heart and behaviour”8. As to the course's theme of 'responses to religious difference', Volf's theology shows the importance of differences in religion, culture and traditions, which are fundamental in the creation of personal and cultural, or even group, identity. His call to “embrace the other” is not a call to assimilate the other into our own image, but to “welcome one another, therefore, just as Christ has welcomed you” (Romans

Open Document