Critical Race Theory Essay

1625 Words4 Pages

According to the authors, Critical Race Theory (CRT) is no longer new, but it continues to thrive. It has expanded from a subspecialty of jurisprudence to the use in department of education, cultural studies, English, sociology, comparative literature, political science, history, and anthropology. CRT treats race as central to the law and policy of the United States. CRT also looks beyond the belief that getting rid of racism means simply alleviating ignorance, or encouraging everyone to get along. CRT looks at many faucets of racism. Microagression are small acts of racism consciously or unconsciously perpetrated; these are absorbed from the assumption about racial matters most of us absorb from the cultural heritage in which we come of age in the United States. The CRT movement is a collection of activist and scholars interested in studying and transforming the relationship among race, racism, and power. CRT questions the very foundations of the liberal order, including equality theory, legal reasoning, Enlightenment rationalism, and neutral principles of constitutional law. CRT race theory sprang up in the 1970s, as a number of lawyers, activist, and …show more content…

As many ordinary citizens did judges defined the white race in opposition to blackness or some other form of otherness. Whiteness, thus, was defined in opposition to non-whiteness an opposition that also marked a boundary between privilege and its opposite. One aspect of whiteness, according to some, is its ability to seem perspectiveless, or transparent. Whites do not see themselves as having a race, but simply, people. They do not believe that they think and reason from a white viewpoint, but from a universally valid one; “the truth” what everyone knows. By the same token many whites will strenuously deny that they have benefited from white

Open Document