Critical Essay On The Things They Carried

768 Words2 Pages

Emily Cheatham
ENC 1102
Literature Paper 1
February 25, 2014

The story “The Things They Carried” by Tim O’Brien is a combination of short stories. These stories talk about the soldier’s and what they carried along with them on their journey in the jungle. Tim O’Brien often departs from the realism and dwells on the soldier’s imaginations. O’Brien shows the magical power of storytelling and shows us how facts and memory are formed into fiction.

Steven Kaplan in his critical essay said that “O’Brien depicts all the “things” that appear in the first chapter in a precise, scientific style”. Meaning that O’Brien shares how much each thing the solider carries weighs either physically or psychologically. For example, “ On their feet they carried jungle boots-2.1-pounds and Dave Jenson carried three pairs of socks and a can of Dr. Scholl’s food powder as a precaution against trench foot”. (Page 114) Also in The Things They Carried, O’Brien mentions how much the artillery weighted right down to the ounce. For example, “ Jimmy Cross carried a compass, maps, a code book, binoculars, and a .45 caliber pistol that weighted 2.9 pounds fully loaded. The reason O’Brien puts the weights into the story is because he wants to show the hardship these soldiers went through and how they pushed through it. This proves the facts and memory interpretation because the things could really weigh that much, but on the other hand the soldiers can think they weight more than normal because of other factors like the heat. For instance, “ It was SOP for each man to carry a steel-centered, nylon-covered flak jacket, which weighted 6.7 pounds, but which on hot days seemed much heavier. (Page 115)

In Steven Kaplan’s critical essay “The Things They Carried” h...

... middle of paper ...

...he book was actually based off of. I agree with Steven Kaplan when he says “These prefatory comments force a reader to consider the fictional as real, since the book is dedicated to the characters that appear in it”. O’Brian is basically incapable to answering the questions about his writing about war because the answers are based on the nature of the Vietnam War.

In conclusion, I agree with Steven Kaplan about how the book portrays a real or imaginary interpretation. The book says its fiction but then reveals a more real side with telling the stories of the men and how this could have really happened. O’Brien describes in great detail the things they carried and how much each thing weighted but how would he know that for sure. O’Brien defiantly shows us that there is a magical power to storytelling and how facts and memory/imagination can be formed into fiction.

Open Document