Critical Analysis Of Ford Motor Company

838 Words2 Pages

Ford Motor Company Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
Ford is a well-established American organization that faces many competitors from around the world, such as Toyota, Hyundai, Mazda, and Chevrolet, among other competitors. In the Forbes “The Largest Companies in the World” (2016), Ford is in the seventh position. The information given in Forbes confirms that Ford is a strong competitor in the car industry, since it applies strategies that allow itself to be competitive and profitable. Being a profitable company not only implies to gain a lot of money in revenue; it also implies to analyze the competitive forces a company must face in the industry. Ford is a profitable company because it has well defined and analyzed the business professor Porter’s …show more content…

Competition is a strong force for the company. Ford has maximized its competitive advantage to addresses Toyota (this one is constantly innovating its cars), General Motors, and other car companies, that do not want to lose their money in closing their business (Ferguson, 2015). Ford has worked on product innovation and technology, producing green products, at low prices, to emit less carbon dioxide, and market penetration and development. Also, Ford has strengthened its products by doing advertising campaigns focused on its innovative scope, such as gasoline consumption and provisions to facilitate the acquisition of products.
Power of Negotiation With Customers
The second force that has made Ford to become profitable is the power of negotiation with customers. Clients exert significantly influence over Ford. In fact, there are moderate substitutes in the car industry where customers can choose from, so Ford has strengthened clients’ satisfaction to addresses the external factors (Ferguson, 2015). Ford has also taken strategic actions to deal with changes in clients’ preferences and needs to prevent terrible consequences for the company. Also, the company is always offering cheaper cars and finance plans to its clients through Ford Credit.
Power of Negotiation with …show more content…

The threat of substitutes is a low force for the company. The substitutes of Ford are public transportation and bicycles; however, people do not use public transportation and bicycles daily because customers take into consideration the loans they pay for their Ford cars, so they prefer to use their cars frequently (Ferguson, 2015). Even though these substitutes are the cheapest options for customers, customers know that those are neither fast nor comfortable and nor safe. There are other car brands in the market; however, customers tend to remain loyal to

More about Critical Analysis Of Ford Motor Company

Open Document