Criminals Should Not Be Sentenced To Life In Prisons

515 Words2 Pages

In 2012 the Supreme Court ruled that juveniles who commit murder could not be sentenced to life in prison because it violated Amendment number eight which states that Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. I agree with what the Supreme Court was ruling because adolescents who commit crimes should not have to serve the rest of their lives in prison and there life was just beginning. It is understandable to punish them, but not give them a life sentence.

There has been studies that have shown that during the teenage stage kids lose a lot of brain tissue, which made them make decisions they would not normally make. Also there is over 1,300 kids that are sentenced to life in prison as an adult. Amendment number eight states that “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted”. Sentencing adolescents as an adult goes against our 8th Amendment. Teens are being tried as an adult and sentenced to life in prison for murder at ridiculous rates in the US. This actually disproves juvenile advocates on the underdeveloped brain argument. …show more content…

He went to these strangers that let him live with them. They fed him and let him stay there for a long period of time. Finally Alonza decided he wanted to go back home, but the stranger would not let him leave. He said “you think you can just live in my house, eat my food and just going to leave without having to pay? Nothing in this world is free”. The guy convinced Alonza to go and rob a local gas station. As he went to the gas station he threatened the store clerk and he tried running but the other employees held him down at gunpoint until the police came. He was charged as an adult and sentenced 13 years in adult prison at the age

Open Document