Criminalization at School: Zero-Tolerance Discipline Policies Might Be Damaging to Students

1298 Words3 Pages

A science teacher in Mississippi asked her students to take a picture with their completed DNA Lego model. John Doe took his picture with a smile and a hand gesture in which his thumb, index, and middle finger was raised. This was enough to earn him an indefinite suspension with a recommendation for expulsion because his school administrators believed he flashed a gang sign although he was simply putting up three fingers to represent his football jersey number. (NPR Isensee, 2014). This kind of criminalization of young people contributes to suspension, dropout, and incarceration, and too often pushes students into what is referred to by many education scholars and activists as the “school-to-prison pipeline,” a term that refers to “the policies and practices that push our nation’s schoolchildren, especially our most at-risk children, out of classrooms and into the juvenile and criminal justice systems” (ACLU 2013). The School-to-Prison Pipeline is one of the most urgent challenges in education today. This paper will focus on the following circumstances and policies contributing to the school-to-prison pipeline: 1) resource deprived schools, 2) high-stake testing and 3) zero-tolerance discipline policies. However, it is important to note that the school-to-prison pipeline is a broad problem not limited to these three components and has been influenced by historical inequities (segregated education), concentrated poverty, and racial disparities in law enforcement (NAACP, 2005). They have each served to isolate and remove a massive number of people, a disproportionately large percentage of whom are youth of color, from their communities and from participation in civil society (NAACP, 2005). I argue for attention to the school-to-pr...

... middle of paper ...

...w Center, and NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund (2011). Federal Policy, ESEA Reauthorization, and the School-to-Prison Pipeline.

Alexander, M. (2010). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York, NY: New Press

American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force (2008). Are Zero Tolerance Policies Effective in the Schools?

Ewing, C. P. (2000, January/February). Sensible zero tolerance protectsstudents. Harvard Education Letter. Retrieved March 24, 2014, from http://www.edlettr.org/past/issues/2000-jf/zero.shtml

Fordham University (2003). National Center for Schools and Communities, Equity or Exclusion: the Dynamics of Resources, Demographics, and Behavior in the New York City Public Schools.

National Council of La Raza (2011). School-to-Prison Pipeline: Zero Tolerance for Latino Youth.

Open Document