Cost Outcome

655 Words2 Pages

Solution #1:
Input, throughput, and output:
The first recommendation I propose is directed towards Section H.R. 3610; Pub L. 104-208; 110 stat. 3009-546, which came into effect to guarantee that the border was protected from illegal aliens from coming to America and also made applications for illegal aliens even stricter than before (Stevens) . The inputs for this recommendation are the utility costs for computers and internet access, cost for traveling, additional training, and office supplies. The throughputs are evaluations and screening exams. The output includes decreasing the amount of illegal aliens deported and allowing benefits by increasing the application process through the federal level.

Best type cost benefit analysis: (Explain why your selection is best/ why others not as useful)
For this recommendation, input would be measured in dollars and the output is measured in utility or level of accomplishment. It would be most effective to use cost utility-analysis in calculating the effectiveness awarding incentives to certain illegal aliens. The input would be measured in dollars and the output is measured in points given to compare illegal and legal immigrants using the incentives and those who are still in the United States due to having amnesty. Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) would not be used because of dollar cost, which is necessary in both input and output and there is no dollar amount for output. Fixed utility method of cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) would not be used because this recommendation would actually have an increase rather than a decrease, while serving the same population. Fixed budget method (CEA) would not be effective due to the population that is being served remains the same.
...

... middle of paper ...

... cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) would not be used because this recommendation would actually have an increase rather than a decrease, while serving the same population. Fixed budget method (CEA) would not be effective due to the population that is being served remains the same.

Best type outcome measure: (Explain why your selection is best/ why others not as useful)
Quasi-experimental is the best outcome evaluation design for this recommendation because the data can be compared before and after the change in the increase of time length for the work visas. Due to these groups not being randomly assigned, but instead are categorized in a before and after, it would be more effective to use quasi-experimental rather than experimental. Due to the fact the pre-experimental experiments are used in the case of utilizing one group it will not be effective.

More about Cost Outcome

Open Document