Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Proofs of God's existence
Science vs religious beliefs essay
Proofs of God's existence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Proofs of God's existence
The existence of God cannot be proved or disproved. The Bible states that we must have faith in the truth that God exists: “And without faith it is impossible to please God, because anyone who comes to Him must believe that He exists and that He rewards those who earnestly seek Him” (Hebrews 11:6). If it was in God’s will, He could just simply appear and prove to the entire world that He exists. But if He did that, faith would not be needed. Jesus said, “Because you have seen me, you have believed; blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed’” (John 20:29).
However, that does not indicate that there is no proof of God’s existence. The Bible says, “The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of His hands.
…show more content…
This states that because the universe shows remarkable design, there must have been a Designer or Divine Creator. For instance, if the Earth were considerably nearer or farther away from the sun, it would not be able to support life as it presently does. If the elements in our atmosphere were even small percentage points different, close to every living thing on earth would not be able to survive.
A third rational argument for the existence of God is the cosmological argument. All results need a cause. This universe and everything in it is an outcome. There must be reason that caused everything to come into existence. Fundamentally, there must be something or someone “un-caused” to cause all other things to come into existence. That “un-caused” someone is God.
A fourth case is known as the ethical argument. Every civilization throughout history has had some type of law. Everyone has a feeling of right and wrong. Murder, lying, stealing, and immorality are rejected across the world. Where did this feeling of right and wrong come from, if not from a Holy
…show more content…
If God exists, then we are responsible to Him for what we do. If God does not exist, then we can do anything we want. without having to worry about being judged. That is why many of those who deny the God’s existence hold strongly to the theory of naturalistic evolution. It gives them an option to believing in a Creator. God exists and eventually all people will know that He exists. The fact that some try so insistently to challenge His existence is in reality a case for His
Thomas Aquinas, a leading scholar of the Middle Ages, argued that “Everything in the universe has a cause. Trace those causes back and there must have been a First Cause that triggered everything else. God is that First Cause.” This was known as his “First Cause” argument.
Within William Rowe’s Chapter two of “The Cosmological Argument”, Rowe reconstructs Samuel Clark's Cosmological Argument by making explicit the way in which the Principle of Sufficient Reason, or PSR, operates in the argument as well as providing contradictions of two important criticisms from Rowe’s argument.
Roger White presents an interesting argument for why God must exist. In his argument, White states that everything in the world is finely tuned to live its life accordingly. In order for this to be possible, God must have finely tuned all beings so that they were well fit for life. In depth, this argument is, “If a fact stands in need of an explanation, and a hypothesis explains this fact better than anything else, then they support each other. Our universe being so perfect for life is a fact in need of explanation. The hypothesis that God has finely tuned everything to be where all living beings can exist in this universe is an explanation to this fact. No other hypothesis compares to such a standard as this one. Therefore, the fact that our
In conclusion I am left pretty much in the same place as I have started. It is impossible to prove or disprove the existence of God philosophically. For every philosopher who publishes his or her opinions on the subject, three more are there to tear it down. In the end I think it is best that man does not figure out the answer to this lifelong question. Some things are better left unanswered.
...uld be fair to judge someone, because they choose to believe in a greater force. However, while it is impossible to know if god or exist or not, I do believe that it is rational to believe in god based on the fact that it brings positive things to our lives. So, in the end, I believe we all must at least remain agnostic, and be open to different possibilities. It is likely that evidence will never surface that suggest god does exist, but what we must do is make a choice to believe or not.
Reasoning like this, alone is not sufficient to prove the existence of God, but it provides us with firm ground to rationally approve and understand the existence of God. One must have faith, to truly acknowledge and believe in the existence of God because as God is perfect and we are not, we cannot see or know the true perfect with full confidence, unless God intervenes--"faith is the gift of God" (Ephesians 2:8).
without the proof of the fact. But on the other hand, God’s existence can not be. proved in terms of objective arguments and scientific facts. In answer to the question, God’s existence cannot be proved, but neither can his.
In this universe everything has a cause of its existence, so this universe might have a cause, but no is sure who created, so we as humans think that God created this universe, but unless if you’re an atheist who doesn’t believe in God. The reason time exist because of this universe, which mean that time has a cause and time didn’t exist before if the universe wasn’t existed. At the end of the day, as opposed to surmise that God exists, we may think there is only an interminable relapse of causes. Something has dependably existed. God's presence isn't coherently demonstrated, yet it is likely, given the premises. Considered without anyone else, the claim God exists is exceptionally implausible, says Swinburne. However, in light of the cosmological contention, it turns out to be more plausible, on the grounds that God's presence is the best clarification for why the universe exists. God is the real reason why orders and purpose of things that we find on this universe, according to design, viz. We can include the contention from religious experience and a contention from supernatural occurrences. Each work a similar way, “The presence of God is the best clarification for these wonders”. When we set up every one of these contentions together, he asserts, it turns out to be more likely that God exists than that God doesn't. the premises are conceivable, and the inductions are natural. So, in spite of the fact that it isn't an explanatory
He had two different approaches to how the universe was created. Paley compared a watched the way the universe, he thought the world was like a machine it must have a des... ... middle of paper ... ... nthropic Principle’ believed that ‘Nature produces living beings but with fine tuning that is found in the universe; life could just as easily not developed into earth’ I think that this quote is trying to say that the universe has been developed by evolution and was created by God, a designer.
... it cannot be explained scientifically, as this would imply the existence of antecedent determining conditions. Because there are no prior determining conditions, the cause of the universe must be personal and uncaused, for how else could a timeless cause give rise to a temporal effect? Moreover, the cause must transcend both matter and time to create matter and time. Finally, in order to create the universe ex nihilo, this cause must be enormously powerful, if not omnipotent. One is warranted in concluding that therefore, God exists.
The Main Strengths of the Cosmological Argument There are many strengths within the Cosmological Argument which have proven theories and ways to prove the existence of God. Many of these strengths have come from such scholars as; Copleston, Aquinas and Leibniz, all of which have put together major points to prove the existence of a non-contingent being. One of the main strengths of the Cosmological Argument is from Aquinas way I that was about motion. This would be a posteriori argument because you need to gather evidence from the world around you.
Thomas Aquinas uses five proofs to argue for God’s existence. A few follow the same basic logic: without a cause, there can be no effect. He calls the cause God and believes the effect is the world’s existence. The last two discuss what necessarily exists in the world, which we do not already know. These things he also calls God.
The Bible teaches that the proof of faith, what faith is based on, is evidence. What is the evidence? Evidence means proof and proof means evidence. It is the testimony, validity, experience, test, and/or the quality of having being tested or tried. The trial or test that a person has been through or is going through where there seemed to be or seems to be no end. The long suffering, the experience of that test or trial, and the outcome of that test and trial and 100 percent of the time it is a positive outcome and the proof is their testimony, the proof is their walk and what they did through their walk, where they put their Faith, their evidence, their proof. The evidence or proof is the assurance in the Word of Yahweh is based upon
But I don't want to presuppose that God's existence is a fact before the proof is established. Simply by looking at what constitutes our world, we can say that all matter consists of energy, proving the existence of energy. How, then, do we know this energy exists? The simple answer is, we are aware of it. We then only have to find out how this awareness came about.
...roofs of God’s existence are basically the same in that they are all, essentially, examples of cause and effect. This cause and effect does not neccesarily prove there is a God but it does lead one to wonder what may be the highest cause, and for this there is no proof.