Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on roles and responsibilities of the audit committee
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Satyam Board’s was mainly comprised of ‘friendly’ directors who were not in the position to question the decisions adopted by the managers. Not only they were pro-management, but they were also incapable of acting when it was quite obvious that the company was facing some severe financial distress. Out of the nine board directors six were ‘independent’ directors. These independent directors clearly did not act on the interest of shareholders and other stakeholders, even when it was obvious that there were fraudulent acts within the company.
Satyam’s scandal has pointed out the larger regulatory failure, which is closely related to audits. The role of the audit committee is to verify and certify the transparency of the disclosed financial information
…show more content…
External auditors, hired by the auditing committee, are responsible for assuring that accounting statements are thorough and objective, and in Satyam’s case, PwC did not fulfill its role as external and objective auditor. Evidence may lead to believe that PwC was aware of the fraud but refused to disclose it under increasing auditing fees provided by Satyam. PwC’s fault lies mainly in failing to verify cash and bank balances. According to a statement released by PwC, its auditors simply relied on the books prepared by the company and did not further investigate the data presented to them. The auditors did not verify the existence of the fictitious fixed deposits and certified the good standing of Satyam. Not only PwC, failed to do its job of providing accurate information to the shareholders, but also played an important role in perpetrating the fraud by certifying a spotless audit report for fraudulent and manipulated books. Another important aspect was the audit fee paid by Satyam to PwC. In fact, between 2003 and 2008, the fee was raised three times, reaching almost double the average pay of comparable firms in the same industry (TCS, Infosys, and Wipro). This evidence is an indication that PwC was bought to comply with the fraudulent practices adopted within Satyam, and ensured that the
When it comes to the audit objectives, the public and the auditing profession maintain varying expectations. The public expects the prevention of fraud to be the auditor’s responsibility. However, the auditors believe that they are responsible for fraud detection, but not obliged to find all of it. In addition, the public views the fraud by the characteristics displayed by management and employees. For example, WoolEx Mills’ management wanted to exude a prevailing financial position and to uphold reputations. By committing financial statement fraud, it made the company look successful even though Sales and cash flows were decreasing. The public would view these particular characteristics as pressures to why the company committed fraud. Greed, recognition, and influences also impacted the public’s view of Wool Ex Mills’ fraud scheme. The CEO used authority to influence employees to take part in the fraud scheme. The public would see that the CEO utilized power to manipulate shareholders, which impacted their trust with WoolEx Mills (Cohen, Ding, Lesage, & Stolowy 2015) (Krishnan & Shah
Sarbanes-Oxley contains eleven titles and covers a wide range of topics from the implementation of new compliance requirements to the criminal penalties of any violations of the rulings. One very important aspect touched upon in Sarbanes-Oxley is auditor independence. Auditor independence and the part an auditor plays in corporate financial reporting in the wake of all the corporate scandals have become extremely important. It has become increasingly important in the training and professional ethics of an auditor. The objective of auditor independence is to have the auditor “be unbiased and impartial with respect to the financial statements and other information they audit”0. There are three aspects of practical auditor independence, programming independence, investigative independence and reporting independence.
Assess the responsibility of audit committees as well as internal auditors in relation to the Satyam scandal.
In today’s business world, an accountant and business owners should work together in order to become aware of scandals that occur in corporate companies. Since 2008 a series of corporate scandals and collapses have highlighted the importance of effective board oversight. One of the largest scandals in the corporate world was known as the Madoff’s Ponzi scheme. I will discuss the details of how an accountant allowed Maddoff to continue with his involvement in the Ponzi scheme. Since then, the board of accountancy is mandating that all corporate companies have good internal controls and getting more involved managing risks within the organization. This is becoming an essential role in maintaining a good system of internal control.
99, Congress took steps in response to big fraud scandals and passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) in 2002 to restore public confidence in accounting profession. The intention of the new legislation is to “improve the audit effectiveness and the credibility of financial reporting” (Ernst & Young 2012). Generally, the Act focus on strengthening corporate governance, enhancing auditor independence and management accountability for financial disclosures and accuracy. Under Sarbanes-Oxley Act, auditors are prohibited to provide non-audit services for audited firms. In addition, Section 404 of the Act requires auditors to evaluate and issue an opinion regarding the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting of the audited firm. The act also requires auditors the audit committee, consisted of independent members, to engage and oversee the external auditors. The implementation of these rules has led to great improvements in audit
A good internal audit mechanism helps in detecting the frauds at an early stage so that the financial losses may be minimized. Operational audits can be taken up to review the effectiveness, efficiency, and economy of operation. It helps in identifying the risks faced by the organization and has an opportunity to improve controls. The external auditor should also try to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence to be able to draw reasonable conclusions using which audit evidence is provided. Sudden checks have to be planned by the management to keep the staff alert and updated. The audit unit should be established separately, and proper vigilance and guidance are to be provided to them in order to check the frauds at an early stage. The staff, management and the executive officers of the organization have to work for the common good of all the stakeholders of the organization and should follow moral and ethical values while carrying on their
Throughout the years, the news covered stories of corporate scandals involving unethical accounting practices. These unethical corporate acts had a tremendous negative impact on these company’s stockholders, investors, employees and the whole U.S. economy. Most of these scandals would have been prevented, if the independent audits of these companies were conducted in an ethical manner. With this in mind, two corporate scandals will be the subjects of further review to understand that an auditor might encounter ethical dilemmas, if independence and objectivity are not part of the audit process. An auditor should keep objectivity at all times.
As a consequence of the separate legal entity and limited liability doctrines within the UK’s unitary based system, company law had to develop responses to the ‘agency costs’ that arose. The central response is directors’ duties; these are owed by the directors to the company and operate as a counterbalance to the vast scope of powers given to the board. The benefit of the unitary board system is reflected in the efficiency gains it brings, however the disadvantage is clear, the directors may act to further their own interests to the detriment of the company. It is evident within executive remuneration that directors are placed in a stark conflict of interest position in that they may disproportionately reward themselves. The counterbalance to this concern is S175 Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) this acts to prevent certain conflicts arising and punishes directors who find themselves in this position. Furthermore, there are specific provisions within the CA 2006 that empower third parties such as shareholders to influence directors’ remuneration.
Auditing is in the challenging position with the emerging technologies and real-time approach in doing business. The audit is a complex activity; this profession has been through many significant changes over the time. The changes that were important for auditing to be updated with the changing business environment. All the changes were done as per the requirements of the legislation that shaped the auditing profession. The main purpose of this paper is to examine what different legislations and how the legislation shaped the audit profession over the past century.
...g to firms misconduct. The bankruptcy of Enron exposed the matter of lack of independence with the Board and the failure of the independent system in the USA which needed to be reformed; however to maintain such independence can be tricky.
The oversight responsibilities of the board, the CAE lacking of expertise or broad understanding of financial controls and responsibilities, and the understaffed internal audit functions lacking of independence and direct access to the board of directors contributed to the absence of internal controls. To begin with, the board should be retrained to achieve financial literacy to review financial reporting. Other than attending formal meetings, the board of directors should be more involved with the management. For the Audit Committee, the two members who were recruited as acquaintances to Brennahan need be replaced with experts who are more sufficiently knowledgeable about accounting rules beyond merely “financially literate”. Furthermore, the internal audit functions need to expand with different expertise commensurate with the expanded activities of the organization, testing financial reporting rather than internal controls from an operational perspective. The CAE should be more independent and proactive to execute audit plans, instead of following orders from the CFO, and initiate a direct and efficient communication between internal audit and audit
Securities Commision Malaysia. (2014). General Article: Corporate Governance. Retrieved March 26, 2014, from Securities Commision Malaysia: http://www.sc.com.my/corporate-governance/
This shows how a lack of transparency in reporting of financial statements leads to the destruction of a company. This all happened under the watchful eye of an auditor, Arthur Andersen. After this scandal, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was changed to keep into account the role of the auditors and how they can help in preventing such
Auditing has been the backbone of the complicated business world and has always changed with the times. As the business world grew strong, auditors’ roles grew more important. The auditors’ job became more difficult as the accounting principles changed. It also became easier with the use of internal controls, which introduced the need for testing, not a complete audit. Scandals and stock market crashes made auditors aware of deficiencies in auditing, and the auditing community was always quick to fix those deficiencies. Computers played an important role of changing the way audits were performed and also brought along some difficulties.
According to Carol Padgett (2012, 1), “companies are important part of our daily lives…in today’s economy, we are bound together through a myriad of relationships with companies”. The board of directors remain the highest echelon of management in any company. It is the “group of executive and non-executive directors which forms corporate strategy and is responsible for monitoring performance on the behalf of shareholders” (Padgett, 2012:1). Boards are clearly critical to the operation of companies and they are endowed with substantial power in the statute (Companies Act, 2014). The board is responsible for directing and steering the company. The board accomplishes this by business planning and risk management through proper corporate governance.