Corporate Governance

2814 Words6 Pages

Corporate governance and CEO risk incentives ,impact on the firm performance

Introduction:
Corporate governance is very important elements that can provide information on how to maximize shareholder wealth . Good corporate governance plays a very important rule to increase the market value of companies. Because good corporate governance defines the rights and duties of the stakeholder of the company including shareholders , management and the board of directors. Good corporate help managers have focused on improving the performance of corporate governance. Good corporate governance is also working for the best interests of shareholders, investors , customers and supplier of corporate governance. Also helps to overcome the bad image and bad reputation of the organization and highlight the failure of the fraud and the reason for the organization.
Maximizing shareholder wealth is important objective of corporate governance can not be ignored at any time. While Berle and Means (1932 ) were the first time to present the theory of the firm governs and that time many authors follow this part and develop new theories Modiglani and Miller ( 1958) develop the theory of structure capital , Jensen and Meckling (1976). Define agency theory ( contract between the principles and agent services on behalf of the principle ) .
Corporate governance is essentially the division of rights and responsibilities among stakeholders , managers, for the purposes of decision making and the settlement of its affairs. Capital structure refers to the capital structure is a mixture of percentage of money working in the company two forms are available from a capital is the capital of the debt and equity. Each capital has its own management setting importance of ...

... middle of paper ...

... have the resources and mechanisms to influence the CEO indirectly.
Some have Pay TV and some serve on the Board of Directors . A leader can make behavior CEO who is selfish, fraudulent , unethical , illegal or otherwise to the attention of other employees or the Board or , in the extreme , regulators , the media, or even the law enforcement ( Dyck et al. , 2010) authorities. In terms of incentives to monitor the CEO, the second captain not only has a fiduciary duty to provide important and accurate information information to the board , but also monitors the CEO .
In this study I do the following steps ….

• introduction.
• provides an overview of existing literature on the subject.
• explains the data, variables and methodology employed during empirical work.
• presents and discusses the findings of the study.
• Finally, briefly concludes the whole discussion.

Open Document