Cooly Vs Acadian Ambulance Case Study

517 Words2 Pages

Cooley v. Acadian Ambulance
The development of legislation is not the end of policy issue, usually it’s only the beginning. As these laws are implemented, there are always situations where the law or a specific policy may run into a situation where it is challenged by the public. This is true even when it comes to legislation that is meant to mitigate the worst case scenario. In this post I will be discussing a case that ended in personal tragedy for one family.
Background
Hurricane Katrina was the source of misery for a large portion of the New Orleans area. The storm devastated the area and left many dead and many more stranded without food or water. In the aftermath, many stories of the city’s most vulnerable, the elderly and infirm, started to trickle in. Russel Embry was confined to bead as a result of brain damage, as a result his care giver and mother Dorothy Hingle,83, had enrolled in an evacuation program established by the St. Bernard Parish, that contracted the Acadian Ambulance to evacuate individuals registered as special needs (Cooley v. Acadian, 2011). Although Mr. Embry had been successfully evacuated on other occasion through this program. Unfortunately, during the evacuation efforts …show more content…

These public-private partnerships are supposed to ease the strains on emergency services while taking advantage of the expertise and resources of private organizations (Busch, & Givens, 2013, p. 7). Utilizing the infrastructure of a private ambulance company like Acadian Ambulance falls neatly into this description. In the case of Cooley v. Acadian Ambulance, the courts ruled that the plaintiffs had failed to prove that Acadian Ambulance had been negligent in execution of their responsibilities, and recognized the challenging situation that Katrina presented. Although this may not have answered questions of reasonable risk, hopefully it began a

Open Document