Conversion Therapy Arguments

874 Words2 Pages

You failed. You failed as a human being. You are doomed to rot in hell, for all eternity. This is how you are “motivated” to change your sexual orientation if you are homosexual (Sanchez 5). You are told you have failed your friends, family, lovers, “God”. Unless... Unless you can change. Conversion therapy is a highly debated topic that is still a battleground today, and a rising one at that. There is a deep history to consider about conversion therapy, and there are, of course, supporters, and critics.
Conversion therapy, or CT, is a program that is designed to change a person's sexual orientation to heterosexual (Haldeman 1). Conversion therapy was started when homosexuality was classified as a psychological disorder. Like any illness, a …show more content…

They aren’t deranged or detrimental to society. The arguments supporters give for conversion therapy is that it offers a choice, that homosexuality is a psychological disorder, and that it goes against Christianity. One of the counterclaims CT therapists and supporters give is that it “gives a choice” (Sanchez 6). The problem with this, though, is the continued belief that homosexuality is a choice. Homosexuality has continually been disproven of being a matter of choice (Markowitz 3). The only thing “changeable” about sexual orientation is one’s feelings about theirs or others. Feelings about something and the actual thing are two different things altogether (Haldeman 6). Furthermore, supporters believe homosexuality is a psychological disorder (Sanchez 2). This, however, has blatantly been proved false. Major mental health associations have reaffirmed that homosexuality is in fact not a mental illness (Markowitz 2). Conclusively, the last argument supporters have is that homosexuality goes against Christianity. Religion, especially Christianity, is a large component of the western civilization. In this religion, it is stated that homosexuality is “sin”. Because of this, many religious groups have taken part in the support of conversion therapy (Haldeman 3). However, this does not warrant the destruction of individuals based on something that doesn’t even

Open Document