Constantin Stanislavski: A Theatrical Prodigy's Journey

873 Words2 Pages

Constantin Stanislavski was born January 17, 1863 in Moscow, Russia. He was born into a theatrical family which helped him since he joined Alekseyev Cirlce in 1877 (a group organized by his family). His grandmother was also a French actress which most likely influenced him as well. Growing up around an artistic family, he was very artistic himself; interested in piano, singing and acting. He performed a lot with his brother and sisters when they were young. When he got a bit older he studied business and languages at Lasarevsky Institute but he never graduated. Instead he self-educated himself while traveling Europe. He ended up taking over his father’s business Alekseev’s factory then made a lot of money in international business and trade. …show more content…

The Stanislavski System was the idea of realistic acting as opposed to dramatic acting. He thought “emotions could be simulated through simple physical actions”. He always changed his ideas though, looking for new and improved ways to perform. For example he switched from ‘Emotional Memory’ to the ‘Method of Physical Actions’. His Emotional Memory idea was that idea of revisiting an old memory to bring back the same emotions. The purpose is to have realistic human emotions portrayed as opposed to faking them. He refers to Emotional Memory as a ‘repeated’ experience and not a ‘primary’ one. Referring to past experiences was called ‘Emotional Recall’. His Method of Physical Actions is a physical map laid out for an actor; trying to get from point A to point B without being boring, unmotivated, or out of character. To create this map he developed “unites and objectives”. A unite is part of a scene that has one objective for each individual actor that changes every time a shift changes within a scene. An objective is expressed through an active and transitive verb directed towards another actor. Stanislavski also came up with other methods such as the Magic …show more content…

Without this sense of truth, the audience won’t believe what you want them to believe; even other actors won’t feel as engaged in the scene if one actor isn’t playing the role truthfully. If you someone could successfully use the magic if and make the audience believe what the character was going through, Stanislavski would call that ‘scenic truth.’ Stanislavski was a big believer of the need for motivation. Without motivation there would be no reason for an actor playing a character to do anything. Motivation or ‘will’ is different from objective though. Objective was more of a goal. Motivation was more of the reason why you do what you do. You must be motivated by your objective. Stanislavski said that motivation was more of a subconscious thing to the character. The character may never talk about their motivation but the actor must be fully aware of what is motivated their character. The use of motivation is a modern psychological

Open Document