Consider The Lobster By David Foster Wallace Analysis

641 Words2 Pages

Food tourism is a growing industry that involves tourists going to new places to eat, drink, and experience the local flavor. David Foster Wallace’s essay Consider the Lobster is a commentary on American food tourism.
In the essay, Wallace offers commentary on American food tourism based on his experiences at the Maine Lobster Festival. As people from all over come to enjoy Maine lobster and surround themselves in the local culture, the festival is a prime example of American food tourism. However, Wallace comments that although “tourism and lobster are the midcoast region’s two main industries,” the festival “represents less an intersection of the industries than a deliberate collision” (1). The way Wallace phrases the sentence highlights …show more content…

Wallace comments that he has never understood the appeal of going to “tourist venues in order to sample a “local flavor” that is by definition ruined by the presence of tourists” (5). He goes on to say that to participate in American food tourism “is to spoil… the very unspoildness you are there to experience” (5). In both of these quotes, Wallace uses deliberate language to further stress his point that food tourism ruins the local culture and flavor that food tourism exists to showcase. The use of the near antonyms “spoil” and “unspoiledness” really brings out the idea that what food tourism is doing to these local places is the exact opposite of the goal of food tourism. Wallace asserts that food tourism is bad for all of the places it touches in all ways but one: economically. He notes that even though these places of local flavor are ruined by American food tourism, they also rely on American food tourism. Wallace sums this up nicely by stating that food tourists have “become economically significant but existentially loathsome” (5). Wallace’s rhythm in this quote causes the reader to pay attention to it and think about the point he is making. His further use of the words “significant” and “loathsome” force the reader to think about how at odds the two sides of the American food tourism industry are with one another. Overall, Wallace’s powerful voice and creative techniques cause the reader to notice and understand his comments on American food tourism as well as reflect on their own opinions about it and involvement in

Open Document