Connotations In Homosexuality In Aloysius's Doubt

787 Words2 Pages

Like others in Angels, Joe embodies a virtuous inclination of love, but proves figurative stagnation through the portrayal of identity-loss. When Harper confronts Joe’s closeted homosexuality, he retorts: “Does it make a difference? That I might be one thing deep within, no matter how wrong or ugly that thing is, so long as I have fought, with everything I have to kill it…there’s nothing left, I’m a shell. There’s nothing left to kill. As long as my behaviour is what I know it has to be. Decent. Correct. That alone in the eyes of God” (Kushner 40-41). Connotations in Joe’s plea juxtapose love’s paradox: sexual identity and social identity are inseparable; mere conformity according to socially-accepted standards impels internalized oppression …show more content…

Reproaching James’ sympathy and tolerance, Aloysius criticizes: “You’d trade anything for a warm look…I want to see the starch in your character cultivated. If you are looking for reassurance, you can be fooled. If you forget yourself and study others, you will not be fooled” (Shanley 15). Aloysius’ assault reveals a critical danger: too much of a good thing – and calls on objective refinement and stamina to avoid love’s deceptions. Also, Flynn, confronting Aloysius, attests their similarity; she retorts: “We are not the same! A dog that bites is a dog that bites! I do not justify what I do wrong and go on. I admit it, desist, and take my medicine” (Shanley 54). Figuratively, Aloysius’ shield suggests that one is what one does without absolve, and the only remedy for deviance is accepting punishment. Connecting cover to cover, Shanley entitled the play “Doubt: a parable” (2005); in its ending, following Flynn’s transfer, Aloysius admits her lie, and laments: “In the pursuit of wrongdoing, one steps away from God. Of course there’s a price…I have doubts! I have such doubts!” (58). Aloysius’ confession reveals a fallacy of relevance; two wrongs do not make a right; the “price” infers consequence of action and dread of its result. Gallicho (2005) adds that doubt “refers to multiple questions and betrayals…for …show more content…

Gaining entrance to Heaven and resigning as Prophet, Prior reasons: “We can’t just stop. We’re not rocks. Progress, migration, motion is…modernity. It’s animate, it’s what living things do. We desire. Even if all we desire is stillness, it’s still desire for…Even if we go faster than we should. We can’t wait. And wait for what? God – […] He isn’t coming back…” (Kushner 275). Prior also pleads for life: “I still want…My blessing…I can’t help myself…I’ve lived through such terrible times, and there are people who live through much worse, but…You see them living anyway…I recognize the habit. The addiction to being alive. We live past hope.” (Kushner 277-279). Having survived for 5 years, Prior concludes: “The world only spins forward. We will be citizens. The time has come…You are fabulous creatures, each and every one. And I bless you: More Life. The Great Work Begins” (Kushner 290). Angels is intricately sectioned and contains two connected plots, personal and public; Prior’s pleas to Heaven represent a personal resolution while the ending represents social absolve. Portraying the personal resolution, the key-words “rocks” and “animate” juxtapose stasis for homeostasis to define innateness of life. Inherent “progress” and “desire” portray life’s journey and longing, even in its inaction (“stillness”), absolute

More about Connotations In Homosexuality In Aloysius's Doubt

Open Document