Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conflicts between conflict and conflict management
Theoretical study of conflict management
Dominant conflict management style CASE STUDY
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Conflicts between conflict and conflict management
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Conflict is an inevitable and common issue in our daily lives. Caused by disagreements in goals, motivations, communication problem or some other factors between two parties that can be real or perceived to exist, conflict is seen as a perceived incongruity of interests (Taylor, D.M and Moghaddam, F.M,1994). Mayer claims further that conflict is normal, natural, necessary and the problem is not the existence of conflict but how we handle it (Mayer B ,2000). Organizational conflict is common in the workplace because people always have divergent opinions on several subjects, interests, beliefs, objectives, and interests.
People manage their conflicts by using conflict management styles. Conflict management style is affected the way conflict is perceived and handled. These conflict management styles are confronting and are opposed to change, because of the importance a person gives to his goals and relationship with others have impact on these styles (Crawley & Graham, 2007). Five basic styles can also be categorized as behavioral patterns of a person. These styles are considered pioneer in the field of conflict management despite of the changes in working environments these styles
…show more content…
Instead of struggling to eliminate conflict, revealing the most appropriate conflict management style can enhance the success of employees and organizations.
Conflict cannot just simply be managed, but rather requires specific strategies and personal skills that can keep it moderate in organizations (Balay 2006). If the conflict does exist, however, then it is necessary to select a method of dealing with it as productively as possible from among the many options available (Brewer, et. al 2002, Owens & Valesky, 2007; Abbas, et. al.
Managers and associates continually face conflict in the workplace. Using the five conflict resolution styles and knowing when to use them makes resolving differences easier.
College life can be quite the adjustment for most new students. When entering the collegiate atmosphere, there are new, sometimes unspoken, social rules and norms. With so many new social elements for students to acclimate to, already difficult situations, such as any form of conflict, are often particularly difficult to address. Fortunately, with a clear understanding of the various forms of conflict management, new students can learn to effectively communicate regarding any subject matter they may encounter.
Conflict Resolution: Understand to Achieve. Whenever people unite to work as a team for anything more than a brief duration, some conflict is normal, and should be expected (Engleberg, Wynn & Schutter, 2003). Because of the inevitability of conflict, being able to recognize, address, and ultimately resolve it is vitally important, since unresolved conflict may have undesirable effects, including reduced morale, or increased turnover (De Janasz, Dowd & Schneider, 2001). Just as conflicts within team environments vary, so do methods for resolving them.
Huan, L. & Yazdanifard, R. (2012). The Differences of Conflict Management Styles and Conflict Resolution in Workplaces. Business & Entrepreneurship Journal. 1(1), 141-155.
While Mike believes that conflict is a normal part of any organization, and the real challenge is how one deals with it. He then provides you with his “5 Keys of Dealing with Workplace Conflict,” (Myatt, 2012) which are: “Define Acceptable Behavior, Hit Conflict Head-on, Understanding the WIIFM Factor, The Importance Factor, and View Conflict as Opportunity.” (Myatt, 2012) What I have learned for this article is, that in order to be a good leader, you need to know how to deal with conflict, employ effective conflict resolution, while also avoided unnecessary
Conerly (2004), further states two things attribute to the way conflict is managed. One is the importance of meeting your own goals and the other is the importance you attribute to relationships and wanting to get along with others.
Four sources of conflict presented by Lamberton & Minor (2014) are content, values, negotiation-of-selves and institutionalized will be discussed. Awareness of and knowing what causes conflict is important in strategizing ideas and plans to resolve them. Explanations and examples of these four sources will follow. The outcome and process of resolving conflict can affect what direction and success we achieve personally and
The traditional view was later rejected by academics and scholars who realized that conflict was not always avoidable ii. Human Relations View. This view considers conflict as a natural and unavoidable phenomenon that cannot be eliminated from an organization (Robbins & Judge, 2015). As such, the conflict was seen in positive light, and it was suggested that it might lead to improvement of the performance of a
When considering your conflict management style with others, be it; personal or professional, we tend to use the style that seems appropriate to the conflict.
Many people enjoy working or participating in a group or team, but when a group of people work together chances are that conflicts will occur. Hazleton describes conflict as the discrepancy between what is the perceived reality and what is seen as ideal (2007). “We enter into conflicts reluctantly, cautiously, angrily, nervously, confidently- and emerge from them battered, exhausted, sad, satisfied, triumphant. And still many of us underestimate or overlook the merits of conflict- the opportunity conflict offers every time it occurs” (Schilling, nd.). Conflict does not have to lead to a hostile environment or to broken relationships. Conflict if resolved effectively can lead to a positive experience for everyone involved. First, there must be an understanding of the reasons why conflicts occur. The conflict must be approached with an open mind. Using specific strategies can lead to a successful resolution for all parties involved. The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument states “there are five general approaches to dealing with conflict. The five approaches are avoidance, accommodation, competition, compromise, and collaboration. Conflict resolution is situational and no one approach provides the best or right approach for all circumstances” (Thomas, 2000).
Conflict management styles vary from person to person. The five styles are avoiding, accommodating, forcing, compromising, and collaboration. According to the assessment my primary style is compromising and my back up style is accommodating. I am surprised by these results and I do not feel they are accurate. The inaccuracy is most likely due to my lack of strong answers. I believe that my primary style is collaboration. It is collaboration because I do strive to win but still let the other parties win as well. I would agree that my back up style is compromising because I will give something up if it means an overall resolution.
Thomas, K. W. (1992). Conflict and conflict management: Reflections and update. . Journal Of Organizational Behavior, 13(3), 265-274.
This elasticity in your approach to choosing which conflict style is best for the current situation is a key to managing conflict. No one style of conflict resolution will work all the time when addressing issues. You must remain flexible to other people’s wants, needs, direction, criticism, schedules, moods, temperament, and a myriad of other things in life. If there is one thing in life that will never change it is the fact that everything is going to change! There is nothing you can do to stop it, so the quicker you learn how to adapt to the changes the better off you will be. The ability to change your approach to dealing with conflict better prepares you to face the interpersonal challenges that will eventually come your way. I believe it is important to also remember that you cannot win every battle with every person you encounter. Knowing that you cannot fix or solve every problem with everyone is very helpful in reducing stress and managing difficult situations with others. My father dislikes when I use this cliché but sometimes, it is what it
Gross and Guerrero (2000) supported Rahim’s conflict management styles and identified that these styles are associated with organizational climate and culture, job satisfaction. Their research on 50 employees uncovered some facts include employees who were involved in unmanaged conflict end up in job dissatisfaction and subsequently their performance deters (p. 208). The competence-based model developed by Canary, Cupach and Serpe (2001) contrast with Rahim’s theory, where the effectiveness of conflict management styles is based on the situation and understanding of individuals (p. 81). They tried to find a resolution for the conflict instead of implementing the strategy to reduce tension by applying conflict management styles, resulting in inconsistent outcomes (p. 531).
Conflict exists in every organization as a result of incompatible needs, goals, and objectives of two people while aligning to the overall business requirements. Though disagreement is linked with negative impact, the approach has healthy considerations (Leung, 2008). For instance, some conflicts create an avenue for the exchange of ideas and creativity to meet the set organizational purposes. However, damaging disagreement in organizations results in employee dissatisfaction, turnover, and poor services and reduced productivity. The paper establishes different types of interpersonal conflict and key resolution strategies used to address the problem. Human resource managers need to have the capacity to identify different levels of conflicts and the best methods to negate them.