Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of descriptive writing
Causes Of Conflict In Literature
Causes Of Conflict In Literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of descriptive writing
The Push and Pull of a Story Conflict is the sole thing that pulls a story together and pushes it forward. Without conflict, there is no action or force moving the story. External conflict usually pushes the story forward with scenes such as fights and internal conflict pulls the story together with more insightful information about the characters’ personalities. However, they could do both pulling and pushing at times. In the fictional short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, there are many instances of conflict in the story between all the characters. One of the first types of conflict that readers encounter in the story is individual versus nature. In this story, Connell uses individual versus nature many time as an external conflict, using descriptive language to describe struggles between the characters and nature. When Rainsford accidentally falls off his yacht on his way to Rio, he struggled to find his way to Ship-Trap Island, the only things aiding him being sounds. Connell says, “For a seemingly endless time he (Rainsford) fought the sea” …show more content…
There isn’t many fights that are hand to hand due to the fact that Rainsford would automatically lose because Zaroff has a gun. However, these men are hunters and have other ways to fight than just hand to hand combat or with guns. Rainsford sets up many elaborate traps for Zaroff, reflecting his many years of experience. After finding the quicksand, Rainsford makes a trap for one of Zaroff’s dogs and his small victory is announced by Zaroff when he says, “You’ve done well, Rainsford, your Burmese tiger pit has claimed one of my best dogs” (21). The fact that Rainsford values human life becomes ironic when he is able to cold-bloodedly kill Zaroff then having a good night’s sleep. Rainsford decided, “he had never slept in a better bed”
Rainsford headed off and had spent two hours making his way across a bush all the while repeating the phrase, “I must keep my nerve” (Connell 11). Rainsford tried to keep calm in a terrifying situation because he wanted to live. He was being motivated by the idea of living so he kept persevering. Rainsford had jumped into the sea to get away from the General and it had worked because later that night Rainsford snuck into the General's room and challenged him. Rainsford ultimately won the game and won the privilege of sleeping Zaroff's excellent bed, because we can infer that Rainsford killed him (Connell 15). Rainsford took a chance and jumped into the sea because he knew he wasn’t going to give up without a fight. When Rainsford showed up in his room he knew the general would not let him leave so he challenged him in order for him to stay alive, again taking a chance in order to live. Throughout the story Rainsford had changed, leading up to this moment when he won the game, stayed alive, and killed the general. In the beginning Rainsford was motivated by the great sport of hunting, but then near the end Rainford's only motivation was to stay
In “The Most Dangerous Game,”Richard Connell uses the dangerous environment of the Island to show suspense while also using a flip between man and animal to convey irony in the story.
Rainsford was forced to choose between life and death by Zaroff. Zaroff tells Rainsford that he hunts people as a type of wild game and takes them hunting first then gives them a few survival things and have to survive for three days in order to win.
"To improve is to change; to be perfect is to change often" (http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/topics/topic_change.html), this quote by Winston Churchill is something I can connect with as I often feel the need to improve myself which can only be done with change. It also relates to the protagonist, Sanger Rainsford, of the short story, "The Most Dangerous Game," by Richard Connell. Sanger Rainsford changes his views on some matters after being trapped on an island with a madman with no method of escape. He undergoes a major change in his character due to an awful experience in isolation with the psychopath, General
General Zaroff used hunting tactics when they were eating “the last supper” at Zaroff’s house. Every time Rainsford looked up, he said, “he found him studying him, appraising him narrowly” (Connell 66). By this, the reader can tell that Zaroff is trying to notice Rainsford’s tendencies. Knowing these can make hunting him easier. Also at dinner, Zaroff explains to Rainsford that “God made him a hunter” and how his father believed that “his hand was made for the trigger” since he was ten (Connell 85). Zaroff sharing this with Rainsford is proof that this man is a talented hunter and has been for a long time. Rainsford is quite the hunter himself. So much so, that Zaroff knew who he was when he arrived. The General stated, “It is a very great pleasure and honor to welcome Mr. Sanger Rainsford, the celebrated hunter, to my home” (Connell 52). Also during the hunt when Rainsford set up the Burmese tiger pit and claiming one of Zaroff’s dogs, Zaroff tells him, “You’ve done well, Rainsford” (Connell 194). If his enemy believes that he is a great hunter, then he must be. Especially because Zaroff thinks so highly of himself. Going back to when Rainsford was
We are introduced to the protagonist and main character, Sanger Rainsford who is a big game hunter and a WW1 veteran. The story starts off with a conversation between Whitney and Rainsford discussing the island, so we can understand the reputation it holds.
In “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, the protagonist (Rainsford) struggled with the actions of the antagonist (General Zaroff) throughout his adventure. The images used to describe the island, deadly swamp, and castle show that it is inhabited and a dangerous place with the use of setting, imagery, and the tone Connell shows Rainsford’s difficulties, persistence, and triumph to the audience. By using these key aspects, Connell makes important connections to the theme while alluding to hunting as the main concept of this whole adventure.
Man verus nature, in a man verus nature conflict a person is against a force of nature. Think of it like a family who lives in a town that has just been hit by an earthquake.
Rainsford overcomes many obstacles, and in return he receives that special feeling of satisfaction in his body. To start, he overcomes the thought of him being weak. Furthermore, he conquers learning the value of even an animal’s life. Not to mention, he defeats becoming the hunted, when he is the hunter. In the short story Sanger Rainsford outwits General Zaroff in the battle of “The Most Dangerous
In the story this happened when Zaroff dogs found rainsford. Rainsford knew that Zaroff had a advantage with the dogs. The lights from the windows sent a flickering illumination that made grotesque patterns on the courtyard below, and Rainsford could see moving about there a dozen or so huge black shapes; as they turned toward him, their eyes glittered greenly.(9). Since Zaroff had a lot of advantages, it made rainsford work hard to survive. Rainsford had to make traps and he had to kill Ivan. At the end of the story Rainsford showed up in Zaroff's room. Rainsford slept in the bed and Zaroff slept with the hounds. Splendid! One of us is to furnish a repast for the hounds. Rainsford didn't have anything to kill with. He had nothing to survive. Zaroff had weapons and dogs. Rainsford tried but believe he couldn't win while Zaroff didn't try and believed that he will win. As the result of Rainsford surviving he won the
Although he isn’t the hunter this time, but the quarry he still manages to stay alive with tricks from his previous experiences. Like when Rainsford was hiding from Zaroff, and he built a trap to get Zaroff. "‘Your Burmese tiger pit has claimed one of my best dogs’” (p.72). This quote supports that Rainsford went against Zaroff (man vs. man) using his background knowledge because the trap he set up for Zaroff was a trap he learned in his prior experience. If Rainsford hadn’t used the Burmese tiger pit trap, then Zaroff’s dog would’ve found Rainsford and killed him. Meaning that the trap Rainsford made, gave him more time to stay alive which gave Rainsford a higher chance to beat Zaroff in the hunting game. Another part of the story that supports that Rainsford uses his prior knowledge to defeat General Zarof was
Killing is not always murder, this distinction is represented many times in the short story, “The Most Dangerous Game” written by Richard Connel. The main characters, Sanger Rainsford and General Zaroff’s, lives revolve around animals and humans being killed. Murder is based on an external conflict, the act of one man killing another man along with every event leading up to one’s final breath. One man killing another man brings on strong emotions involving the internal conflict of the characters. Making the decision of what is murder and what is not lies in the element of irony. Taking another beings life cannot always be considered murder, this will be identified through external conflicts, internal conflicts, and the irony within murder.
Conflict is one of the main driving forces behind a story. Without conflict the characters in the story would have no reason to do anything. Because of this every story requires some type of conflict in order to progress. The types of conflict can range from a man enduring the elements, known as man against nature, or as one character against a larger group, man against society. In addition to the other styles of conflict, the most relatable and compelling is when one character is set against another, known as man against man. Kate Chopin’s story “The Storm” displays three examples of a man against man style conflict, Bobinot against his wife Calixtra, Alcee against Calixta, and Alcee against his wife Clarisse, these show how a nonviolent conflict can occur between characters.
This conflict, although very real, is more about man’s ability to persevere and realize that nature simply exists with no evil intent, that in the scheme of the universe, man’s significance should not be based upon supposed supremacy. The intensity of the conflict with nature is shown with each stroke of the oars, each crash of the waves, and each bucket of water that is thrown overboard as the life boat takes on water. It is in the brutal reality of this setting that Crane acknowledges the setting as the antagonist within this tale. Nature bombards the lifeboat with a constant assault; the men are driven by the need to persevere in order to stay alive. As a result, there are moments in which a sense of fatalism can be seen as the Captain remarks, “If we don’t all get ashore – if we don’t all get ashore, I suppose you fellows know where to send news of my finish?” (344). These are crucial moments depicting that no matter the dedication and will to survive this ordeal, the lives of the men are still dependent upon the aspect of Nature being accommodating. It becomes an inner conflict against fatalism and the external conflict against nature.
One of the conflicts that were revealed from the beginning of the story was the conflict of one character versus another the conflict was between the woman and her husband, John. This conflict is a type of external conflict – a state...