Comparison Of Max Weber And Karl Marx

1786 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Marx and Weber theories

Max Weber and Karl Marx were similar on some level in their sociological ideas, however they had some key differences that are important to analyze. Max Weber was born in 1864, whereas Marx died in 1883. I think over the years there has been obvious speculation on whether Weber was contrasting his work to that of Marx. For me, I think that Weber formulated some of his ideas from those of Marx and was able to capture his own sense of society. The importance of examining these two sociological theorists is that their ideas affect the future of sociology. Their ideas helped to give future sociologists a perspective on society, and allow for people to examine and recognize how we all interact in this complex world.
Weber was different from Marx …show more content…

For Marx, his belief was that "history was driven by class struggle" and that this was the problem in society (Farganis, 2014). Marx saw the means of production as an important factor for the problems in society. He believed that who owned the means of production caused great tension in society for those who worked for the means of production. Marx's focus was on the division of society into two classes, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. In a Marx perspective, the economy was a key element in the class struggle and how wealth was unequally distributed. I think even though Marx and Weber had differing views on society, they can be viewed similarly and related to one another. By this I mean, Weber's view of a bureaucratic society can be viewed as a counteract to Marx's examination of a capitalism society. I think that Weber viewed bureaucracy as a result of capitalism and changing times. Both Marx and Weber wanted for society to be more equal, but Marx was more optimistic than Weber was. Marx believed that a communist society would cause for a society to become entirely equal, he had hopes for people and the future of the economy. In opposition, Weber a pessimist, could not see a brighter future; he believed that a bureaucracy would not eliminate inequality but lead to future problems. Marx thought that society could eventually change, and Weber believed that due to history things were not going to change as …show more content…

As stated by Ferrarotti, Marx and Weber both had a "predictive power" for society (Antonio, Glassman & Ferrarotti, 1987). Marx gave insight to the development of a capitalist society with his "concentration of power and the tendency toward a society divided between those who possess the means of production and those who are possessed…" (Antonio, Glassman & Ferrarotti,1987). Weber's analysis of …bureaucratization was prescient about certain, major modern social developments" (Antonio, Glassman & Ferrarotti, 1987). Both Weber's and Marx's views on society have shaped and continue to shape the way we are able to understand people and their interactions within society. I think that through their analyses of society, I can conclude that history plays major importance to how they cultivated many of their ideas that drove the passion for the famous works they have each

Show More
Related

  • Similarities Between Karl Marx And Max Weber

    185 Words  | 1 Pages

    America is supposedly where all men are created equally, yet society has created a hierarchy based on socioeconomic standing and political power. Theorists Karl Marx and Max Weber has applied their theories of social class on the model of social stratification; a system in which society ranks categories of people in a hierarchy. According to Karl Marx, the main classes of society are the bourgeoisie and the proletariat; those that are the owners of the means of productions and those who work for it. On the other hand, Max Weber argued that there is a multidimensional ranking rather than a hierarchy of clearly defined class. America has created a social system in which those of middle and lower classes tend to struggle to decrease the gap within

    Read More

  • How Class Influences Identities

    393 Words  | 1 Pages

    Karl Marx (1818 - 1883) and Max Weber (1864 - 1920) both recognised that economic categories played a large part in social class structure. Nineteenth Century history plays an important part in understanding how class influenced identities. The Industrial revolution was changing the structure of the communities, the rich or landowners having a far better standard of living with better education, health care, property ownership and power than the poor. The working class would have a daily struggle to survive. The change in Trade Unions meant that the working class had a voice, helping to push their needs forward, looking for better standards of living and working conditions. Marx's concept of class was based around the production of goods. The emerging owners of these goods, or capital, were known as the ruling class. Marxism would define only two classes, the ruling class and the working class. The influence on identity of these two class structures would be very relevant in those days. The working class would earn a wage from the production of the goods but the ruling class would sell these for a profit and exploit the workers. The two classes were on two different levels of wealth, property ownership and social standing and they would struggle to mix, they were dependent on each other but the rewards would be unevenly matched.

    Read More

  • Anarchism and Marxism: A Comparative Study on Equality

    1496 Words  | 3 Pages

    Both argue that the structures in place that are meant to maintain order, in actuality are not in the general interest and make problems worse. “In bourgeois society, living labor is but a means to increase accumulated labor.”(Marx, 19) The bourgeoisie benefit from the oppression of the proletariat through the means of production. Marx argues that to fix this problem of the proletariat being oppressed would be for the state to own the means of production. “The executive of the modern state is but a committee for managing the common affairs of the whole bourgeoisie.”(Marx, 5) Marx argues that the government in place at that moment was not there to ensure the public interest but the interest of a select

    Read More

  • Marx and Nietzsche's Theories

    3996 Words  | 8 Pages

    Society is flawed. There are critical imbalances in it that cause much of humanity to suffer. In, the most interesting work from this past half-semester, The Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx is reacting to this fact by describing his vision of a perfectly balanced society, a communist society. Simply put, a communist society is one where all property is held in common. No one person has more than the other, but rather everyone shares in the fruits of their labors. Marx is writing of this society because, he believes it to be the best form of society possible. He states that communism creates the correct balance between the needs of the individual and the needs of society. And furthermore thinks that sometimes violence is necessary to reach the state of communism. This paper will reflect upon these two topics: the relationship of the individual and society, and the issue of violence, as each is portrayed in the manifesto.

    Read More

  • Weber And Weber's Theory Of Protestantism

    1368 Words  | 3 Pages

    1). Weber and Marx views differ when it comes to their interpretations about the origins and dynamics of capitalism, Weber’s view focuses on the Protestant reformation and the spirit of capitalism in the west and how “the widespread influence of Protestantism after the reformation helped explain why full blown rational capitalism developed where and when it did” (Mcintosh pg. 115). Although he doesn’t believe that Protestantism caused for the creation of capitalism he does believe that Calvinism a branch of Protestantism plays a roll due to the effects it shaped upon these people and their protestant ethics. Mcintosh helps to explain that “in such a time the religious forces which express themselves through such channels are the decisive influences in the formation of national character” (Mcintosh pg. 122). In other words due to the asceticism and the spirit of capitalism amongst these religious followers they abstained from various worldly pleasures to obtain their spiritual “calling”. In decreasing pleasures and increasing work, production and profits, they were hopeful that they were increasing their chances of going to heaven due to their belief about predestination which states “in theology, the doctrine that all events have been willed by God. John Calvin interpreted biblical predestination to mean that God willed eternal damnation for some people and salvation for others” (www.wikipedia.com). Thus they followed the doctrine precisely, which they believed could possibly decrease their chances of being the individuals who were damned to hell. Although Wesley argued “I fear that wherever riches have increased, the essence of religion has decreased in the same proportion. So although the form of religion remains, the spirit i...

    Read More

  • Karl Marx's Analysis Of Social Class

    630 Words  | 2 Pages

    Marx’s analysis of social class is that there will always be a divide between the haves and the have not’s. He separates them into two classes the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. The bourgeoisie signifies the capitalist class, while proletariat signifies the working class. Max Weber’s defines class as “a group of people who have a similar level of economic resources”(p.244). He identifies two main elements of class, material resources, and skill knowledge in the marketplace. In contrast to Marx’s view on class Weber believed that class was not just based solely on ownership of means of production, but could also be based off ownership of other resources and the amount knowledge one has. Pierre Bourdieu’s view on class is that it is based on the concept of cultural capital meaning, “our tastes, knowledge, attitudes, language, and ways of thinking that we exchange in interaction with others”

    Read More

  • Karl Marx: Philosophy, Politics, and Class Conflict

    826 Words  | 2 Pages

    Karl Marx was a German philosopher who studies at the university of berlin. He was a Hegelian. He was very active in the political scene, thus springing his desire to combined philosophy, political science and economics. Marx believes that we are the product of our environments but we also have the power to change our environment. He believed that human beings can shape the environment that we live in through our abilities. He also believes that philosophers should not only interoperate the world, but they should be able to change it (Citation). Marx believed that history is all based class conflicts. He uses the example of the Bourgeoisie and the Proletariat. The bourgeoisie is the oppressive class, they consist of the rich, upper class,

    Read More

  • A Comparison of Karl Marx and Max Weber

    568 Words  | 2 Pages

    During the nineteenth century, Karl Marx and Max Weber were two of the most influential sociologists. Both of them tried to explain social change taking place in society at that time. On the one hand, their views are very different, but on the other hand, they have many similarities. Weber had argued that Marx was too narrow in his views. He felt that Marx was only concerned with the economic issues and believed that that issue is a central force that changed the society.

    Read More

  • Analysis of the Main Strengths and Weaknesses of Marx’s Sociological Thought

    1663 Words  | 4 Pages

    To Marx, history d... ... middle of paper ... ... 67 Jon Elster, Making sense of Marx, Cambridge University press 1985 C.Slaughter, Marxism and the class struggle, New Park Publications LTD 1975 Tony Bilton, Kevin Bonnett, Pip Jones etc.. Introductory Sociology 4th edition, Palgrave Macmillan 2002 Gregor McLennan, The Story of Sociology Ken Morrison, Marx Durkheim Weber, Sage publications LTD 1995 Fulcher&Scott, Sociology 2nd edition, Oxford university press 2003 --------------------------------------------------------------------- [1] German Ideology, pp.8-13 [2] Karl Marx: Selected Writings in Sociology and Social Philosophy, p.150, Pelican books 1963 [3] ibid, p107 [4] Karl Marx: Selected Writings in Sociology and Social Philosophy, p.177, Pelican books 1963 [5] Essential writings of Karl Marx; p176; Panther Books Ltd ,1967

    Read More

  • Marx, Weber, Durkheim, and Simmel: The Relationship between Society and the Individual

    3473 Words  | 7 Pages

    Each of the four classical theorists Marx, Weber, Durkheim, and Simmel had different theories of the relationship between society and the individual. It is the objective of this paper to critically evaluate the sociological approaches of each theory to come to a better understanding of how each theorist perceived such a relationship and what it means for the nature of social reality.

    Read More

  • Karl Marx and Capitalism

    893 Words  | 2 Pages

    Karl Marx’s critique of political economy provides a scientific understanding of the history of capitalism. Through Marx’s critique, the history of society is revealed. Capitalism is not just an economic system in Marx’s analysis. It’s a “specific social form of labor” that is strongly related to society. Marx’s critique of capitalism provides us a deep understanding of the system to predict its pattern and protect ourselves from its negative sides.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Marx Weber And Durkheim

    519 Words  | 2 Pages

    In short, Marx stated that class represent group of people. Based on collective effervescence, people with shared thoughts and ideas will spontaneously group together and develop collective consciousness, that they are all somewhat related to each other. On the other hand, Weber suggested that class is not a group, it is just people with same characteristics gather together, they don't necessarily have moral solidarity, the connection with each

    Read More

  • Comparing and Contrasting Sociological Theorists Max Weber, Emile Durkheim and Karl Marx

    1584 Words  | 4 Pages

    The first theorist to consider is Karl Marx. Marx has a uniqueness all of his own. His attention was normally directed towards capitalism in society. He studied the basis of inequality under capitalism. (Ritzer, 2004) When you look into Marx’s work on the dialectical method you can see one of the differences between his studies and Durkheim and Weber. It says, “ The dialectical thinker believes that it is not only impossible to keep values out of the study of the social world but also undesirable because to do so would produce a dispassionate, inhumane sociology that has little to offer to people in search of answers to the problems they confront.” (Ritzer, pg 46) I believe this is showing the depth of Marx because he is basically telling us that without your values when you study sociology you lose the passion of it.

    Read More

  • The Sociological Contribution of Karl Marx to an Understanding of Contemporary Society

    909 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Sociological Contribution of Karl Marx to an Understanding of Contemporary Society. This essay will discuss how the Karl Marx contributed his knowledge to the understanding of contemporary society. Karl Marx is often referred to. as the ‘intellectual father of modern day Marxist economics’.

    Read More

  • Marxism And Marxism

    1266 Words  | 3 Pages

    He is known worldwide for his numerous theories and ideas in regards to society, economics and politics. His outlook on these subjects is known as Marxism. Marxism focuses on the imbalance and struggle between classes and society. Marx’s theories stem from the concept of materialism based society and the implications thereof. These concepts leads to the Marxist theory of the failure of capitalism. Marx had a number of specific reasons for the downfall of capitalism yet capitalism remains very real and successful. Marxism covers a wide range of topics and theories, but an in depth analysis of his criticism to capitalism and how it is not relevant to modern day will be explored.

    Read More

More about Comparison Of Max Weber And Karl Marx

Open Document