More handpicked essays just for you.
What can people learn today about the pardoner's tale
What can people learn today about the pardoner's tale
What can people learn today about the pardoner's tale
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The difference between the tale of the Three Brothers and the Pardoners Tale is that in the Pardoners Tale the pardoner told a story of three rioters while the Tale of the three brothers was about three brothers. Unlike the tale of the three brothers, the rioters went searching for death because they wanted revenge. When they found the old man, he said he knew where death was after the three men threatened him and said he was in an old grove and pointed in the direction. When they came upon death they forgot it was death they were searching for because they found 8 barrels full of gold. They wanted everything for themselves and they were willing to kill the other rioters to get it. So they sent the youngest one to go get supplies in the town
Wes (the author) has a family who wants to see him succeed. Although Wes didn’t know his father for long, the two memories he had of him and the endless stories his mother would share with him, helped guide him through the right path. His mother, made one of the biggest effects in Wes’s life when she decided to send him to military story, after seeing he was going down the wrong path. Perhaps, the other Wes’s mother tried her best to make sure he grew up to be a good person, but unfortunately Wes never listen. His brother, Tony was a drug dealer who wish he could go back in time and make the right decisions and he wanted Wes to be different than him. He didn’t want his brother to end up like him and even after he tried everything to keep Wes away from drugs, nothing worked and he gave up. As you can see, both families are very different, Wes (the author) has a family who wants him to have a bright future. Most importantly, a family who responds fast because right after his mother saw him falling down the wrong hill she didn’t hesitate to do something about it. The other Wes isn’t as lucky, as I believe since his mother already had so much pressure over keeping her job and her son Tony being involved in drugs. Same thing with Tony, he was so caught up in his own business that no one payed so much attention to
Money is a very important attribute to have, but worrying about it too much could maybe get you killed. In the canterbury tales there are two tales. One of them is the pardoner's tale and the other is the wife of bath's tale. I believe that the pardoner's tale is the better tale. (Geoffrey Chaucer) author of (The Canterbury Tales). In the Canterbury Tales the narrator goes on a pilgrimage and for entertainment he has the people he went on the pilgrimage with tell him tales. And he would reward whoever told him the best tale. The pardoner's tale is about three friends who let greed and money get to their heads which end up killing their friendships and themselves. The wife of bath's tale is about a knight who let's lust get to his head instead of loving someone for who they are. Although both tales are great tales and give a great moral lesson, The pardoner's tale is the better tale of the two because of its ability to teach a lesson while still creating a great story.
In the beginning of The Pardoners Tale he talks about his qualifications and what he does, talking to several people. The pardoner tries to use his story to get the audience to give him money for their greedy sins. Then he tells a story about three young men who find an old man and they talk about age, the younger kids say the don’t want to grow old like the old man. The old guy tells the kids that they can find death by a tree. Excited to see death, the kids go to the tree and discover a pile of gold coins instead. Excited they decide to draw lots to decide which one would go down to the store, and who gets to stay with the money. The one who lost would have to go down to a store and buy some bread and wine that is later poisoned. Meanwhile, back at the gold, the other two conspire to kill the guy that is walking to the store by stabbing him to death, so instead of splitting the money three ways there would be more money apiece by splitting it two ways between them. So when they guy who walked to the sore gets back they stab him (he dies). Then the two drink the poisoned wine afterwards and they died from the poisoned wine.
After some time, the Pardoner is ready to present his tale, including both moral interjection and a merrier tone. The Pardoner begins by describing a group of young Flemish people who spend their time drinking and indulging themselves in all forms of excess. He continues to tell the tale, in which the people eventually end up drinking positioned wine and all die. As is, there are more details in the tale that we did not go over, there are some key elements that help us to better understand the Pardoner upon hearing his tale. First of all, we know from The General Prologue that the Pardoner is just as bad or corrupt as others in his “profession”.
Liesel, a young girl who faces the challenges of coming into a foster family in 1939 Nazi Germany. To make things worse her foster parents are not for the Nazi Party. Day after day Liesel swallows down secrets like hiding a Jew in her basement and stealing from the rich. The author of The Book Thief writes about how when Liesel arrives in Germany and when she starts to steal, “Liesel’s world is both opened up and closed down” (Back Cover).
The Pardoner’s Tale should win over The Wife of Bath’s Tale based on comparison of the tales being entertaining, morally sound and meeting all contest rules set by The Host. The Pardoner’s Tale was entertaining with the three men in search of death to kill it and in return get killed by death. The tale was morally sound by all the greedy men wishing to kill, dying from each others greediness. The contest rules were followed throughout his tale, and the contest was based on the tale and not the teller. The Wife of Bath’s Tale lacked being morally sound and was therefore what lead to her fault.
The Pardoner's Tale had to do with some religious issues again. In this tale it discusses different types of sins, and tells a tale of a group of boy's sins.
The stories are similar in some ways. They both make sacrifices for something they want, in “The Pardoner’s Tale”, they plot to kill their friend “Now look; when he comes back, get up in fun/to have a wrestle; then, as you attack,/I’ll up and put my dagger through his back” (Chaucer 248-250). They sacrificed their friend for money, their greed was stronger than their love for their friend. In “Federigo’s Falcon” Federigo wants to make the best meal for Monna so he searches and sees his falcon “And having discovered, on picking it up, that it was nice and plump, he decided that since he had nowhere else to turn, it would make a worthy dish for such a lady as this” (Boccaccio 163). He sacrificed his last pleasure for the woman he loved. In both stories the sacrifices were ironic because the rioters all ended up dying and Federigo killed what Monna came for.
In Geoffrey Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales, the character of The Pardoner tells an ironic tale, while being a masterpiece of irony himself. The story he tells is an allegory, which is a story which teaches a lesson. These were very popular in the time period of The Canterbury Tales. The pardoner makes a living by travelling around and granting ‘pardons,’ which were a document effectively pardoning one of sin. He uses his tale to coerce people to purchase a forged pardon, which exhibits his hypocrisy. In doing so, Chaucer is criticizing the church. The pardoner’s ironic lifestyle becomes his downfall as he fails to get money from his pardons.
Through the Prologue to the Pardoner's tale, the character of the Pardoner is revealed. Although the Pardoner displays many important traits, the most prevalent is his greed. Throughout the prologue, the Pardoner displays his greed and even admits that the only thing he cares about is money: "I preach nothing except for gain" ("Pardoner's Tale", Line 105). This avarice is seen strongly in the Pardoner's tale as well. In the Pardoner's tale, three friends begin a journey in order to murder Death. On their journey, though, an old man leads them to a great deal of treasure. At this point, all three of the friends in the tale display a greed similar to the Pardoner's. The three friends decide that someone should bring bread and wine for a celebration. As the youngest of the friends leaves to go buy wine, the other two greedily plot to kill him so they can split the treasure only two ways. Even the youngest decides to "put it in his mind to buy poison / With which he might kill his two companions" (383, 384). The greed, which is evident in the character of the Pardoner, is also clearly seen in the tale.
A number of characters with different personalities are read upon in The Canterbury Tales. Although there are many characters within these tales that share or differ within their morals, the two characters that are being compared are the Pardoner and the Summoner. Both of these characters have jobs and work for the Church. Although they work for the church, they act the same way in their actions. While the Summoner was careless in the way he acted around people, the Pardoner was very slick within his antics. He was a liar to people who needed help, and found joy in tricking them.
The Pardoner tells the story for the reasons of him showing how he is greedy, manipulative, and shameless.
"If gold rusts, what shall iron do" (502)? This question seems to be the basis of the comparison between the parson and the reeve. One, a good man on the inside and out, the other, a wonderful fascade to hide his true personality. Althgough completely different, one tries to imitate the other to make himself appear a good man.
An interesting aspect of the famous literary work, "The Canterbury Tales," is the contrast of realistic and exaggerated qualities that Chaucer entitles to each of his characters. When viewed more closely, one can determine whether each of the characters is convincing or questionable based on their personalities. This essay will analyze the characteristics and personalities of the Knight, Squire, Monk, Plowman, Miller, and Parson of Chaucer's tale.
The biggest difference between the two texts is that one is about gangs and racism while the other is about the way a boy’s perception of his father changes as he grows up. However, both texts cleverly use techniques to convey messages that are relevant to our society.