Comparing The Play 'Death And The Maiden'

1417 Words3 Pages

“We’re going to put him on trial, Gerardo, this doctor. Right here. Today. You and me.” (p.26) This is a quote from the play Death and the Maiden by Ariel Dorfman. The play is set in Chile, just after the dictatorship. However, although this is somewhat important to the story, it is not the main focus of the play. The play actually focuses on a women named Paulina who captures a man claiming he was a doctor who had tortured and raped her in the past. However, the man, whose name is Roberto, claims that he is not the doctor. This is essentially the whole play, except for at the end, it leaves us on a cliff hanger. The play never actually says if Paulina let Roberto free or killed him. If I were to come up with my own ending, I would say Paulina …show more content…

Paulina’s past was very scarring for her. She was kidnapped and claims that she had been tortured and raped, more specifically by a doctor she calls “The doctor who played Schubert.” (p.22) This doctor apparently would play Schubert for the captured people to “soothe” them and that’s why she calls him that. All this has caused Paulina to be very traumatized by these events, to the point where even fifteen years after this had happened, she still is affected by it. For example, she cannot listen to Schubert even if “[…] he’s still [her] favorite composer […].” (p.21) She is physically repulsed by his music, because of all that the doctor had done to her. However, in the text she says that she will be able to listen to him again. Though, it is inferred that she would need some sort of closure on the situation, whether that be a confession from Roberto, who she thinks is “the doctor who played Schubert”, or her killing Roberto. “[…] one thing I need to make this day really truly perfect? To kill you. So I can listen to my Schubert without thinking that you’ll also be listening to it, soiling my day and my Schubert […].” (p.63) After the play leaves you on a cliff hanger, it shows Paulina and Gerardo at a Schubert concert. It also says that Paulina see’s Roberto at the concert, but “He could be real or he could be an illusion in …show more content…

In this case, I believe that the “thing” that gets in between them is the fact that Gerardo would most likely go to authorities to tell them about Paulina shooting Roberto, since Gerardo represents justice in the story. Gerardo represents justice, because he works for a Commission trying to get justice to those who had committed crimes during the dictatorship, because he was supposed to be Roberto’s lawyer while he was captures and because he strictly follows the laws. Nevertheless, Paulina would not allow Gerardo to go to the authorities, because she had just been freed of all those painful memories of her past and she could finally start living her life like a normal person. Hence, I believe the only thing that would stop Gerardo from going to the authorities is killing him. However, this is not the only reason why I feel that Paulina shot Gerardo. I believe there were some things that helped motivate her a bit more into killing Gerardo. For one, I think Gerardo would remind Paulina of the time he cheated on her. He would constantly remind her of that mistrust and that time he hurt her. “How many times did you fuck her?” (p.54) I also believe that she was fed up with always being the one to make sacrifices. She was always the one

Open Document