Comparing The Fantastic: The Structural Approach To A Literary Genre

1677 Words4 Pages

Phillip K. Dick, revered American science fiction writer, once said, “Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn’t go away” (Popova). Whether the character in a book or the reader of said book, how can anyone know what is reality and what is an illusion? When a specific character in a book and the reader experiences this mental dilemma of what is reality and what is an illusion, we call that sensation “the fantastic.” The fantastic is a term coined by literary critic, Tzvetan Todorov in his book, “The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre.” The fantastic creates a feeling of hesitation and contradiction when met with an event that was previously thought impossible by the specific character in the novel. Todorov …show more content…

When Dick creates the world of Ubik, he uses our real-life world as a template. If Dick would have used a fictional extraterrestrial society with anatomically different aliens as the characters, then it would significantly diminish the feeling of the fantastic for the reader. Readers would not have a natural world to compare a supernatural event to because the reader would think more about how this extraterrestrial society operates, what laws of nature from real life apply to this society, and the biology of these aliens and less about hesitations felt from the plot. If the aliens experienced the same situations as the characters in Ubik, readers would not be able to assess the gravity of the situation without those elements. We know the world of Ubik is based on Earth and uses human characters from the text. The offices of Runciter Associates are located in real life New York City (Dick 1) and the narrator describes the characteristics of a character in human terms (Dick 25). This allows the reader to compare the world of Ubik to the world of real life and sets up the reader for a future hesitation on an event in the

Open Document