Comparing The Flood In The Epic Of Gilgamesh And Genesis

762 Words2 Pages

Comparing the Flood As human beings, we are designed to belive in something. Although the belief in a higher power or religion is diverse, many theologies share common themes. “The Epic of Gilgamesh” and the Hebrew book of “Genesis” are seemingly polar opposites. Christianity, demonstrated in Genesis, is monotheistic, and the Hebrews base their faith on their relationship with God. On the other hand, Sumerian philosophy, found in Gilgamesh, is polytheistic, and the Sumerian people base their theology on fear. Ancient polytheistic literature forms an archetypical pattern of the mortals trying desperately to please the gods. A mortal’s entire existence rests in the hands of the sometimes childish gods. In spite of this, these two stories …show more content…

The main character in both “Genesis” and “The Epic of Gilgamesh” are similar in nature, but their religious backgrounds can explain the different interpretations of the events around them. The Sumerians and the Hebrews witness a flood, but they experience it through biased eyes. These two interpretations of a flooded earth could actually be accounts of the same event. The Sumerian viewed the flood through polytheism. They needed a way to explain what was causing the flood, so they naturally turned to the gods. Utnapishtim believes a god named Eu has come to warn him of the god’s plan to send a flood. He then builds a boat to escape the wrath of the gods. However, Noah believes he receives divine word from God, saying “build an ark of gopher wood… and with the I will establish my covenant” (Genesis 73-74), and Noah finds peace in God’s divine plan. The Hebrews eternalise the event of the flood through relationship instead of through the fear that God could strike them dead. The people of the ancient world's cultural background impacts the literature we read today. If the reader steps out of their cultural and religious bias, they can understand that neither story is necessarily wrong. Judging one story more harshly and questioning its authenticity takes away from its literary purpose. The point of comparing both stories is not to prove which is historically correct, but that the reader makes the …show more content…

Some of the simpler similarities are that the extent of the flood reaches every part of the earth, the flood is intended to destroy mankind, aside from the heros and their families, Utnapishtim and Noah are found righteous by their God or gods, and they build an ark to certain qualifications. An example of a less obvious similarity is the location of where the arks first touche land. In the general sense, they both landed on a mountain: Noah’s “ ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventh day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat” (Genesis 75) and Utnapishtim's “boat stuck fast beside Mt. Nimush” (Gilgamesh 57). Taking this information a Step deeper reveals that Mt. Ararat and Mt. Nimush are about 300 miles apart. Both boats land in a relatively close proximity. Further proving the idea that the Sumerians and Hebrews experience the same event. Utnapishtim’s and Noah’s lives are dramatically changed by the flood. They sacrifice all that is familiar to them in order to receive the blessings of God or the gods. The heroes are both examples of a term I will call the archetypal path of blessing. Utnapishtim and Noah are both comfortable with what they have before the flood, but as Christopher Columbus States “One can never cross the ocean until one has the courage to leave the shore.” Utnapishtim and Noah give up what is ordinary to receive what is great. The blessings of both characters

Open Document