Comparing Stephen Sondheim And James Lapine's Into The Woods

502 Words2 Pages

Like many fiction novels, plays have also been a big part of literature and have been around for not only decades but also centuries. Plays tell a story, a story that a reader could then see with their own eyes. Plays not only entertain a viewer’s eyes, but plays can also entertain a viewer’s mind and make them think critically. Stephen Sondheim and James Lapine’s play Into the Woods is an example of this. If a reader or viewer were to reader or view Into the Woods in a critical way, they might be able to view it in a performance studies way. A viewer could consider the text in relation to their aspects of performance, or any kind of analysis that focuses mainly on the study of performance (Alton, Performance, 1). This theory is perfect for Into the Woods and many other plays because they are text that then are created into a physical performance. …show more content…

Looking at the first question, a viewer might suggest that the performance was easier to watch than reading the text was, because the in a performance a viewer could see what was happening than just trying to imagine what was happening as they read the text. For example, at the beginning of the text the “I wish” scene for a reader it might have been easier to watch that seen play out in front of them than to just read it as the text keeps jumping from one character to the next. Looking at the next question of whether the characters are aware of the audience or not, the view would have to look closely at the play itself. They would have to decide the actions of the characters shows that they know they are being

Open Document