Comparing Sigmund Freud's Psychodynamics And Child Of Rage

797 Words2 Pages

Freud’s Psychodynamics and Child of Rage Sigmund Freud’s theory of psychoanalysis maintains that children are neither good nor bad, and that human behavior is caused by two basic instincts possessed by all humans, which are sex and aggression. (Robbins, Chatterjee, & Canda, 2012, p. 171)Click and drag to move‌ These basic instincts are held within our unconscious minds, but have significant impact on our behavior. According to Freud’s psychodynamics, our behavior is influenced by unconscious motivation, which manifests during our psychosexual stages of development. In order to achieve healthy human development, psychodynamics explains that gratification must occur at each of the five psychosexual stages. “[Freud] believed that development of the psyche (personality) depended on the way in which the child expended libidinal energy in the erotogenic (sexually sensitive) zones of the body at different phases of development. Further, the lasting feelings the child gains about self and others are dependent on the resolution of conflict at each stage.” (Robbins et al., 2012, p. 173)Click and drag to move‌ The five stages in which …show more content…

However, she was denied such control at such a vulnerable age. As a result, Beth appears to display anal expulsive behavior as she matures by venting her rage through inappropriate sexual behavior, destructiveness, and cruelty toward her brother. Because Beth never obtained gratification during the first two stages of her life, she did not develop a superego by the third, or phallic, stage of development. Without a superego, Beth did not learn a sense of conscience, or a moral right from wrong, which adequately explains her psychotic behavior during her later childhood

More about Comparing Sigmund Freud's Psychodynamics And Child Of Rage

Open Document