Comparing Outliers And Epstein's Sport Genes

656 Words2 Pages

When you train hard enough you can master or finesse a skill, therefore several people don't require training. Specific people are born with genetic enhancements that assist them with the skill and grants them an upper hand. David Epstein believes that genetics assist with the activity and does all of the work(Epstein,7). Malcom Gladwell believes that training pays off, moreover that if you train hard for plenty of hours you could surpass a prodigy(Gladwell,11). In Gladwell's writing Outliers, he talks about facts on how if you train for 10k hours you can master a skill. In Epstein's writing Sports Gene it revolves around a boy that was born with a genetic enhancement that doesn't train nevertheless is almost a pro without any training at …show more content…

Epstein's Sport Genes is more about how a boy named Thomas was born with a bigger Achilles tendon and Epstein thinks that the tendon does all of the work(Epstein,7). As you can see theses both are very complex option. However, even over all this Gladwell does provide more evidence. In Outliers Gladwell states that there were three classes and each one of them practiced different hours, and they saw a real change(Gladwell,12). The one that seemed to practiced more the more they accelerated in class and better they got at playing violin. Forthwith, this is factual evidence from a real-life story which proves practice makes it possible to actually improve your performance. In Sport Gene it talks about a boy named Thomas which was born with an enhanced achilleas tendon which allowed him to jump higher than most of the team(Epstein,6). He went on to compete, barley winning coming close to second although a trained jumper about beat him. This proves that training can allow you to surpass a prodigy because if he trained a little more he would have been able to surpass a person like

More about Comparing Outliers And Epstein's Sport Genes

Open Document