Comparing Lord Of The Flies And Gone

543 Words2 Pages

Can children behave themselves without any authority to keep them in check? Both William Golding and Michael Grant present their views in their books, Lord of the Flies and Gone, respectively in that order. In Lord of the Flies, a group of schoolboys are trapped on a deserted island with nothing but their wits and whatever they find on the island to survive. In Gone, all children younger than 15 in a small town have to survive after the mysterious disappearance of all the adults and older teenagers. Golding expresses darkness in humanity in his book when some of the Jack and his hunters leave the young to fend for themselves, the willingness to kill in exchange for respect and authority, and the hunters’ obsession of the blood from their prey. Grant expresses darkness in humanity in his book when only Sam and his friends were willing to help the young, Drake’s sadism, and Caine and his minions use their powers to bully other into submission.

The details in both books make them seem very different from each other, but in reality the have a very similar plot. An event leads the characters in both books stranded and by themselves without any help. The main characters are determined to help everyone and try to escape. Both books have an opposing group …show more content…

In Lord of the Flies it only took a few days for Jack Meridew and his hunters to become obsessed with the blood of animals, but with rising tensions they even resorted to killing fellow humans. The hunters did not kill for necessity, they killed for fun and for respect using the excuse of wanting meat so they could get away with it. Most of the older characters would’ve abandoned the young ones which would’ve condemned them to death. If it wasn’t for Ralph, the blood of the young children would’ve been on Jack and his hunters. Jack and his hunters were driven mad during the isolation revealing their true inner

Open Document