Comparing Frankenstein And The Communist Manifesto

1168 Words3 Pages

Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and Karl Marx and Frederick Engels’ The Communist Manifesto were both were writing that was both published in the eighteenth century. At a first glance, you wouldn’t think that these two books had shared similar ideologies, but in fact, they were both critical of certain aspects of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth-century culture. Being that Shelley and Marx were Romantic thinkers which did not reject science and reason the just felt like science gone too far. The novel Frankenstein did not reject science and reason, but rather use it as a cautionary tale towards science and the arrogance of scientist. Mary Shelley contains explicit depictions of marketplaces, wager urnings, workers, and forces of manufacturing. …show more content…

Shelley through her novel attempted to bring forth imagination in contrast to reason. Within Frankenstein, you learn Victor Frankenstein was inclined toward the behavior and beliefs of the enlightenment, whereas Elizabeth was more of a romantic thinker. Victor’s parents did not support his fascination towards scientific reading but instead favored Elizabeth who in a way led a traditional life. The enlightenment was a practicing ideology around the time Shelley wrote Frankenstein. It is as if Mary wrote the character of Frankenstein with a projection of her own self at the time. Since she was considered a Romantic she followed the principles that did not support the extensive scientific research and adoption of reason. The enlightenment period was a social construction. In the Communist Manifesto, Marx and Engels critiqued the enlightenment philosophy of progress. They stated that the pass does not progress through gradual reform, but it is related to revolutions, actions, and decision through social forces within a society. They both critiqued at the view that the enlightenment could solely work through reason. Their critique of modernity was, in fact, a critique of reason. Marx wanted to prevail over modern society by rearranging the social and economic links within the …show more content…

Shelley’s novel represents the same economic perspective that Marx relays, the moment in this the dominant mode of production become the production of the commodities. The most important representation of alienation is through Victor Frankenstein, the monster who created, and how he is now perceived to the world. Frankenstein upon gazing at him is completely disgusted with what he created and will soon learn the error of his mistake. The monster could be used as an example of what Marx was referring to by alienated labor. Marx’s states in his work that production makes the worker both “deformed and Barbaric”. Mary Shelley took it to a more literal meaning because he is forced to forever be a plague to his society. Victor was as an Entrepreneur. A scientist who did the unthinkable and ventured outside of the box, but he did not know what he was creating. He did not think of the consequences that might befall on him or directly take responsibility for the reckless abandonment of the creature. In an allegorical sense, the creature can be then portrayed as the

Open Document