Comparing Berger And Mills's View Of Sociology

In the works “Sociology as a Passion to Understand”, written by Berger, and “The Sociological Imagination”, written by Mills, sociology encourages us to examine how our personal lives connect with the larger world. While Berger and Mills both support that the sociologist must fully commit to their work, they have differing opinions concerning why the sociologist behaves the way that they do. The sociological perspective introduced by Berger is supported by Mills’ foundation of the sociological imagination. For sociology to satisfy both the ordinary citizen and the sociologist it requires not only an in-depth inquiry of society and social relations, but a broader view of how society and social relations influence and reflect individuals.

However it is best to first establish how sociology is misused when not imposed correctly. Berger criticizes the ordinary citizen who attempts to understand sociology by confusing it with fields of work that it can apply to. “Sociology is not a practice but an attempt to understand“; Berger elaborates this point by explaining why society must use the sociological perspective to correctly use their sociological knowledge. Mills has a similar contention with the misuse of sociology. The private orbs people find themselves stuck in remain intact unless they use their sociological imagination (Mills). Our sociological imaginations come from our ability to switch to and from differing social perspectives. If we are to practice sociology we must be able to envision how individual lives affect the world as a whole and vice versa. Anthony Giddens has described the individual who can embrace the sociological imagination as one who is able to “pull themselves away from the situation and to be able to think from an alternative point of view”. In other words, the ability to utilize sociological perspectives is a prerequisite for seeing the world through the sociological imagination. Therefore the authors support each other’s claims in these