Compare And Contrast The Postal Savings System

981 Words2 Pages

The postal savings system was a small financial institution established in 1910, as a means of serving as a refuge from the Depression during 1929-1938. The postal savings system’s purpose was to function as a program provided throughout post offices for the low-income saver with the primary object of encouraging a safe and convenient place to deposit savings at a low interest rate for those who are among the lower-class citizens. The postal savings system experienced almost explosive growth during the Depression, it showed to have had an effect on the savings and loan industry, the housing market, and also the banking system. Based on the implementation of the postal savings system, This new postal savings system that came to be about, differed …show more content…

The postal savings system focused on providing an accessible means of saving money for all people including those who are lower-class citizens that might not have regular access to an alternate means of saving, utilizing a government operated financial institution to reinvest local deposits back into the local communities, and existing as a financial institution that would appeal to the small saver, but not compete with the banks or the saving and loan industry. Funds from depositors in the system were meant to be divided. 5% of all deposits were meant to be held in reserves, so that the postal service could meet all withdrawal demands. The other 95% was meant to be reinvested into local banking institutions. Banks who took the deposits paid out the 2% interest to depositors while the additional interest yield was utilized by the government to cover overhead of operating the Postal Savings …show more content…

The United States government was reinvesting depositors’ money into government securities, not the local communities in which the deposits were made. The violation of this directive constricted the money supply, and it hindered banks from normal operating measures. The problems caused by the distortions that were introduced into the economy that affected the banks, took a toll on the newly introduced postal banking system during the Depression. The inflexibility of the postal savings system ultimately led to its failure as a financial institution, which ultimately explains its short lifespan of only 56 years (O’Hara and Easley, 753). The system did not provide any flexibility to the changing economic states, and in doing so, it became the primary competitor to private financial institutions during the economic turmoil of the 1930s. The positive outcome of the postal saving system, was that regardless of all the failure, it showed that people wanted a stable means of saving

More about Compare And Contrast The Postal Savings System

Open Document