Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Canada before and after confederation
Canada before and after confederation
Essay on canadaian history
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Canada before and after confederation
The fathers of confederation in Canada’s beginning stages had a very specific mindset while creating the country in which we know today; to create an empire without following in the same footsteps as our neighbours the United States of America. Throughout this essay this statement will be proven by delving into the relations these both countries hold with their predecessor; England, by discovering their constitutional differences, and by analyzing matters surrounding the different uses of division of power. There are many differences with Canada’s neighbour, the United States of America; some in which can be dated back to our ties with our English heritage. Canada is known as a constitutional monarchy; meaning that although they are independent from …show more content…
The Prime Minister of Canada; since the establishment of the Statue of Westminster, is the head of the Canadian government. He is in charge of the day to day activities for the Canadian people while the Governor General; a representative of the crown, is charged to uphold tradition and as a means to pay respect to the Canadian heritage. He/she deals with the more ceremonial side of Canadian politics with no political power over legislation. The fathers of confederation had a dream for Canada to be an ‘empire within an empire’ , an independent state but still tied to their English founders. America on the other hand needed to be 100% independent from England , completely distancing themselves from their roots. “No taxation without representation” is a common expression used in the 1750s and 1760s after English
Jefferson and Adams Thomas Jefferson and John Adams were both strong presidents who kept a stabile nation, but they differed in their methods of doing so. Adams was a federalist so he helped establish a stable government by focusing on forming a strong central government. Jefferson being a democrat-republican worked to establish stability in the US government by promoting state’s rights. They both worked for stability in different but successful ways.
The Founding Fathers and Canada’s Founders both faced many obstacles and concerns when working towards creating the best possible form of government for their respectable nations. The Federalist Papers seek to counter the Articles of Confederation whereas Canada’s Founding Debates is a discussion between supporters and opponents of Confederation. Between the Founding Fathers and Canada’s Founders in the Founding Papers chapter Federal Union, there are many common concerns about the future of the country. When there is a change in how a country is structured, it brings concern over group rights and interest being ignored for the common good, and it is very
Before 1931, Canada was under the British crown, meaning the Canadian government abided by the decisions made by the Queen. However, Canada has long escaped the rule of Britain as portrayed though many instances in Canadian history and it can be proven by many instances throughout history. Canada not only demonstrated it was a self-governing nation, but it was also a strong one. Specific examples of Canada’s growing independence are the Chanak Affair, the Balfour Report, and the Statute of Westminster
The article of confederation is the very first constitution that was written by early colonists and was adopted by Congress in 1981. Because of their experience from British, they feared strong national governments and needed something to hold their states together to protect them from future attacks. They also hoped to make a strong economy by trading with each other and foreign lands. This and other reasons brought a need for a stronger federal government and this led to Constitutional Convention of 1787. Therefore, the Constitution replaced the Articles of Confederation in 1789 (Keene, Cornell, & O’Donnell, 2011).
Canada and The United States do have a lot in common for sure, except their type of economy is quite different. Canada has a mixed economy where the government and the civilians both have a say in things that happen around the country. While The United States have a Market economy where the government has little involvement in the country while civilians have most say in important decisions. But in the end a mixed economy does have less disadvantages and more advantages to the system.
Since 1793, at the Treaty of Paris, Canada was under British rule, France and Britain had fought for the power over Canada and France was defeated. But “in the 1860s the British colonies were facing many different kinds of problems” including political difficulties of English and French speakers having diverse opinions about the government. As well as economic troubles because there were not many places where colonies could vend their products and military dilemmas because of the unbalanced bond amongst the United States and British North America. The resolution to these complications was for the different colonies settled in Canada to unite as one abundant country. So in 1867, Canada “became a self-governing dominion of the British Empire” until 1931, when the Statute of Westminster was passed by the Parliament of Great Britain. , This Statute presented several countries under Dominion including: Canada, Newfoundland, New Zealand, Australia, the Union of South Africa and the Irish Free State their independence. With the success of Vimy Ridge, “Canada’s participation in the war won it a place at the table at the Paris peace talks in 1919 […] And in 1931, the Statute of Westminster gave Canada control over it’s own foreign policy.” Not only did the battle of Vimy Ridge prove Canada’s nationality, but it also united Canadians into a single unit led by a Canadian Major-
In the 1500s the Founding Fathers began creating a vision for the United States, an ideal image of how it should run. In developing this vision, they looked to two of the strongest political systems of the past: Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome. From ancient Greece the Founding Fathers took the three branches of government, roles of courts and representative government. From Rome the Founding Fathers took the senate and the veto power of both the senate and president. Although both of these ancient civilizations crashed and burned, the Founding Fathers were looking for new ways to intertwine the rights of the people and the political placement of power from one person to all people.
Canada has been under the ruling of a Constitutional Monarchy for the past five centuries, with Queen Elizabeth as head of state. This topic has led to extreme controversy throughout our nation, as Canadians side with the monarchists or the republicans. This has been a rising debate in recent decades, whether or not preserving ties to the British are beneficial, recent polls suggest that the nation could be split 50-50 or worse. Canada making the decision to separate from the British, would be irresponsible. Why inflict disarray upon our country to fix something that isn’t broken? The Monarchy is a splendid part of our cultural heritage, the repercussions of severing British ties would be detrimental and the Queen’s embedding in our constitution
Outline Canada’s constitutional arrangement. Give a robust and well-supported explanation that outlines its historical origins, principles, and key legislation. (300 words) Canada is a constitutional monarchy where the parliament can make amendments to the constitution. What this means is that the monarch of the U.K. is the formal head of state. In this system, Canada has a constitution but also has some shared powers. In Canada, there are duties where the provinces or the national legislation has autonomy. In 1867, Canada passed the Constitution Act. The Constitution Act established three provinces and defined the structure of the Canadian government. In 1931, the Statue of Westminster
The British North America Act went into effect July 1st, 1867 creating a union known as the Dominion of Canada, but this did not complete the debate on the Confederation issue. Many Nova Scotians continued their opposition to the idea and it would take considerable time before all Nova Scotians would accept the fact of Confederation. “These Nova Scotians, disgruntled at their treatment by Great Britain, found that their loyalty had markedly diminished. The more they considered taking over the responsibility for their own affairs from England, however, the greater trust they had to place in Confederation.”25 Confederation struck a balance between the rights of English and French speaking Canadians. Nevertheless, many divisions, conflicts, and debates would occur not only in Quebec but also in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick over this balance. Economic disparities between the Maritimes and the rest of Canada would also create many problems for the years following 1867. As a result, Confederation can be viewed as a beginning and not an end.
Canada has become a superior nation thru, perseverance, courage and even care as they persevered thru many dark battles, and made sure they all came thru together as a unit other than individuals. Their courage made there fighting 100% stronger as they wouldn’t back down to any task and they weren’t afraid to lose their life to help a fellow friend and country out. Care played a major aspect in each Canadian heart. There cared about Britain so they weren’t to go help them when they declared war, they helped other troops with their emotional problems and lastly they even cared a little about there enemies as they are the same person, however the only thing separating them is there culture. Canadians contributed in many ways to help our country's great efforts in the First World War.
The Confederation act of 1867 without question has had a major influence on the status of contemporary Canada. It has helped shape Canada into one of the worlds most politically and economically powerful countries; a country that is strong, independent, and united. There was a series of events which led to the confederation of Canada, some which are more significant than others. However, I believe that despite the significance of events such as the British encouragement of uniting its North American colonies, the central and key reason for confederation was the fear of potential American (Yankee) inhabitance (whether by persuasion or invasion) of the divided and vast British North American colonies, and the way that the “Fathers of Confederation” were able to take advantage of this situation and persuade reluctant colonies to join Confederation. A strong and united nation could not be easily invaded or bought. These essential factors will be discussed in the paragraphs to come.
Canada and China are very different States and are run by very different forms of government. The basic underlying difference between the two governments is the location of sovereignty in the counties. In China it seems as though the people do play a large part in the government, but after studying it, it is evident that the power really rests with the Communist party and the dictatorship. While in Canada the people popularly elect their representatives who elect their Prime Minister.
In conclusion Canada gained independence because of a series of events that took place during the twentieth century. If it hadn’t been for these events, Canada to this day might have been a part of the British Empire. Through discussion on the Chanak affair we signalled that we wanted autonomy. Through our hard work and lives, the world knew we had the ability to stand alone as a strong nation. While, our international reputation of being a “peacekeeping” country the right to stand as an independent self-governing nation. But finally through the Canada Act, we stood solely independent from our Empire. It is obvious that the twentieth century provided us with great chances to become an independent strong nation.
Since Canada's unique Constitution was a demonstration of the British Parliament in 1867, just Britain had the ability to transform it. In 1980, Canada and its areas started a communitarian procedure “to bring home the Constitution and to fuse a Charter of Rights and Freedoms”. An advisory group of Canadian Parliamentarians, speaking to all gatherings, considered more than 1,200 composed entries and more than 300 declarations to build up the last Charter. “Accepting endorsement from Britain for the last time, Queen Elizabeth II marked the Canada Act on April 17, 1982 in Ottawa. This activity gave Canada control over its Constitution and ensured the rights and opportunities in the Charter as theincomparable law of the