Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Respond essay : why do we have too few women leaders
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Respond essay : why do we have too few women leaders
These Ted Talk are given by Sheryl Sandberg (Why We Have Too Few Women Leaders), the current COO of Facebook, and Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie (The danger of a single story), a novelist. In both Ted Talks, these women address the issue that relate to their place of expertise. Repeatedly throughout the Ted Talks, Sandberg and Adichie bring up the challenges and issues that are current in their place of work while also adding their personal stories and insight. As a result, they bring awareness to these issues to all those involved in that specific place of work; and they are able to effectively explain the points presented in the presentation. Also, through the personal stories and insight shared, both women allow their audience to see first hand …show more content…
By sharing this experience, Sandberg was able to expose to her audience how women are belittled and undermined in the workplace and how it results in women playing a much more passive role in their position, causing them to refrain from taking advantage of certain opportunities. Similarly, Adichie does the same. In her presentation, she includes an experience she had with a family from her homeland. As a result of her single sided knowledge of the family, Adichie passed false judgement on this family. From her story, Adichie exposed to her audience that having only a single sided knowledge on any situation blinds the individual from seeing the situation for more than that. While incorporating personal stories, both women introduced outside sources to help strengthen their arguments. Both Adichie and Sandberg introduce their sources by introducing the author, giving a brief background on them, then presenting the evidence they wish to use. I find this to be effective because by giving a brief background on the author, it demonstrates to credibility of the source. Additionally, the way they present their sources does not interrupt the flow of the presentation. They are able to intertwine their sources together and tie it back nicely to their original topic. It appears so
On September 5, 1995 Hillary Rodham Clinton delivered a speech to the United Nations 4th World Conference during a Women Plenary Session, located in Beijing, China. Clinton spoke about how women around the world were not treated equally, how women rights should be equal to human rights, and the ghastly abuse and discrimination women faced around the world. The reason for the conference was to strengthen women, families, and societies in order to empower women to taking control of their lives and not be subject to such discrimination. She emphasized how education, health care, jobs, and political rights were not equal between genders and that the world needed to change. Clinton gave a very convincing speech because of her use of rhetorical techniques. The use of pathos, ethos, logos, and anaphora created a powerful, persuasive argument against the way women were treated around the world. Clintons main goal of this speech was to appeal to the audience and convince them that this is unequal treatment is an immense matter and needs to be addressed all over the world.
In the American society, we constantly hear people make sure they say that a chief executive officer, a racecar driver, or an astronaut is female when they are so because that is not deemed as stereotypically standard. Sheryl Sandberg is the, dare I say it, female chief operating officer of Facebook while Mark Zuckerberg is the chief executive officer. Notice that the word “female” sounds much more natural in front of an executive position, but you would typically not add male in front of an executive position because it is just implied. The fact that most of America and the world makes this distinction shows that there are too few women leaders. In Sheryl Sandberg’s book “Lean In,” she explains why that is and what can be done to change that by discussing women, work, and the will to lead.
She first uses an appeal to pathos through her personal stories of being struck by stereotyping. She also utilizes an appeal to ethos by establishing her credibility as one both affected by, as well as guilty of , stereotyping. Her parallelism drives her main argument, that one can not use a single piece of information or a single point of view to draw a conclusion about another, home. Finally, Adichie’s tolerant tone evokes an audience that is willing to listen. She was able to use these four salient strategies to support the argument against
Reading the poems in second person makes them much more personal and easier to connect to and imagine oneself in the situation, to picture what is happening. It forces you to pay attention to the little details. Second person point of view forcibly draws the audience into the scene, gives them no choice but to mentally participate. It helps you to avoid the disconnection brought on by monotone narrative textbooks. In her Ted Talk, Chimamanda Adichie makes the observation that if you “show a people as one thing, as only one thing, over and over again, and that is what they become.” With Rankine’s second person tellings, creating a “single story” becomes impossible, because the reader is drawing on their personal emotions and experiences. So
Sheryl Sandberg came to Ted to give a speech in 2010. She had a story about her preschool daughter and asked Pat, the CEO if she could add it to her speech. Pat responded with “Absolutely tell that story.” That’s when Sandberg then realized she could help others especially, woman by being honest about her own experiences and challenges. Sheryl Sandberg says “I tried to be authentic and share my truth”. She also says “she feels short of doing it all and it felt good to not only admit it to others but herself.” When you give a speech you should always want to be authentic, open, and transparent. Allowing yourself to do this will allow the audience to listen and understand what you’re opening up about during the speech. If you’re not authentic
After Watching Carol Dweck’s Ted Talk I realized how our lives as students would be so much easier if schools used the “not yeat” technique except, it comes with some downsides because if you tell someone “not yet” it might defeat their confidence if they have tried several times before.
The goal of Hillary’s speech is to persuade her audience that her ideas are valid, by using ethos, pathos, and logos. Hillary is the First Lady and Senator, she shows credibility as an influential activist for woman rights. “Over the past 25 years, I have worked persistently on issues relating to women, children, and families. Over the past two and a half years, I’ve had the opportunity to learn more about the challenges facing women in my country and around the world” (Clinton 2).
After watching Adichie’s TED talk “The Danger of the Single Story” and the film directed by Christopher Quinn God Grew Tired of Us, a main similarity within both of the media was addressing the stereotype misconceptions in parts of the world. Stereotypes exist all over the world and one misconception of one individual could later represent an entire population. In addition to stereotypes, Adichie expands the reasoning for these stereotypes to lie behind power. Meaning that an individual obtaining power has words that have the most impact and leaves that specific listener close-minded to their opinion. Adichie explains in the TED talk “The Danger of the Single Story,” Power is the ability not just to tell the story of another person, but to
Lean In: Women, Work and The Will To Lead, by Sheryl Sandberg, addresses how women can achieve professional achievement and overcome the lack of leadership progress that has been absent over the past few years. Sandberg uses personal experience, research and humor to examine the choices that working women make everyday. She argues that women can achieve professional goals while still being happy within their personal lives. She argues this by going into detail about what risks to take, how to pursue certain professional goals and how to overcome struggles such as balancing a family and a career. All through Lean In, Sandberg uses the fourth dimension of interpersonal effects through a Narrative to show her indicated stance on gender construction, she includes examples of marked forms as well as cultural gender expectations within communication.
Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie made numerous of valid points in her Ted Talks (2009), The Danger of a Single Story. She enlightened readers that incorrect information can travel through generations and never be corrected. She expressed that one single story is the gateway for judgement, and once you present a person as one thing over and over again that one thing becomes that person. Ms. Adichie explained that a single story creates stereotypes which are incomplete stories. A single story also provides a piece of a story that can be seen as the whole story, which develops misconceptions. Furthermore, it robs people of dignity and shines light on how we as people are different and not similar. Overall, we should educate ourselves so that we
When speaker Brené Brown was about to give a talk, the event coordinator struggled with calling her a “researcher,” saying that people might not want to come because they would think she was “boring and irrelevant.” Instead, she wanted to call her a “storyteller” since she thought Brene´Brown’s story-telling abilities were a highpoint. Brown’s academic insecurity was not satisfied in simply being called a “storyteller.” She decided her qualitative research was, in actuality, collecting stories and concluded, stories, were “data with a soul.” She then embraced the title “Researcher-Story-teller,” which combined her unique abilities (Brown, 2010). Building our own personal brand is a combination of strengths; its “what makes us
On page 113 of “Writing Arguments” we can read, “arguments are often improved through the use of stories that make issues come alive or sensory details that allow us to see, feel, and taste the reality of a problem” (Ramage, Bean, and Johnson 113). Throughout Goldberg’s article we see her using examples from individuals that she has interviewed; getting their personal story and making it more real for the reader. Through this technique, readers find themselves to be more relatable to the writer because the article is now more personal. For example, in the article written by Goldberg, one woman talks about how she is afraid to publish articles or post to blogs for fear of backlash from the online community for having views that may be different from others that are also writing online (Goldberg 14). You see stories on the news of people being bullied and publicly humiliated online and this is what is going on with the feminist movement right now. Bloggers and activists are de-crediting others in their field due to comments and incidents on social media cites which make people afraid to voice their opinion. This is something that many readers may struggle with and can relate to so the writer is smart in bringing up this topic for
Emily effectively transitioned into the content by starting off with the causes for insufficient punishment for criminals engaged in sex trafficking by giving multiple examples of victims and criminals through a few references. For example, The Washington Post and ABC News were sources she mentioned where she received her information from. Emily then transitioned to the effects of the lack of jail time for traffickers. Quiana casually led into the content of her presentation by mentioning the extent of hazing and then transitioned over to discussing the effects of hazing. She gave some examples and stated her sources, Texas State University and Hartwick College. Quiana applied a personal touch to this part of her presentation by mentioning her own exposure from a previous college she had attended. Both presenters transitioned into the solutions of their topics effectively by stating their bills and giving examples of what can be done. One example Emily gave was to encourage victims to testify and one example Quiana gave was to have students sign a
Adichie presenting the speech was to inform the non-feminists that feminism is not all about anti-men. She uses her past stories to reflect on
Renowned British actress and activist for the feminist movement, Emma Watson, in her speech to the United Nations, “HeForShe,” argues that gender discrimination is a plague to human civilization. Watson’s purpose is to sway the audience that gender inequality has to come to an end, with the support of men and women as advocates for egalitarianism. Additionally, she enlightens the audience that the problem originated from political affairs, the economy, and social disparity. Watson creates a compassionate tone in order to convey men, specifically those who negatively perceived feminism or did not think that feminist issues affected them. Nevertheless, Watson’s speech is ineffectively persuasive due to the poor description she formulated