Compare And Contrast Russia 1 And Peter 1

683 Words2 Pages

Although, there were many great tsars and tsarinas, Peter I was known as the great. He strived to give the tsar absolute power to make Russia into a strong state as a powerful empire, to do so he had to make many important war, government, and financial decisions. He was an intelligent political and war leader, who was a member of the legendary Romanov family. Granted that, he continued the family’s great power. During his rule, he had many missions. One of the more important missions was to fix Russia’s landlocked situation. His determination allowed him to try to Westernize Russia by forming an alliance with the Ottoman Turks. Although, he failed his goal of creating an alliance, Russia gained a plethora of useful knowledge. For example, Peter learned ship making techniques and other useful information. …show more content…

For example, they were both the greatest rulers of their empires. Elizabeth was the last of the large Tudor family, while Peter was Ivan’s successor and then he was succeeded by Catherine I. They were both also great political leaders;provided that, they both created new, stronger, and more able governments. Each of them also expanded the power of the country by exploring overseas, competing with neighboring countries, and supporting trade and industry. Yet, they both were very different. First of all, Elizabeth was well liked by the people of England, and Peter was disliked among the Orthodox Church and many people in his empire. Also, Peter would secularize schools making them non-religious and Elizabeth and her country were very religious. Lastly, Peter created the Table of Ranks, which had sectioned off his people;conversely, Elizabeth created the Poor Laws and cared for the victims of poverty. Lastly, Elizabeth was a great supporter of the arts ,but, Peter was more interested in trade. Each of them were magnificent leaders who only made their empires stronger and more

Open Document