Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Archetypal themes in literature
Common themes in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In both “A Lamb to the Slaughter"” by Roald Dahl and “ Popular mechanics” by Raymond Carver the authors shows the readers that the couples have relationship problems. Telling the readers if you do not deal with your diffrences in a healthy way someone will get hurt. The central idea with these two stories is relationship problems. There are some similarities the authors have in both stories. One of the similarities is that the men are leaving their partners. For example, in “Popular Mechanics” it shows how the girl is yelling at the guy to pack up his stuff in his suitcase and to leave. In addition, "Lamb to the Slaughter" “Of course I’ll give you money and see you’re looked after. But there needn’t really be any fuss. I hope not anyway”. In both stories the husband is telling his wife he is leaving her, but the authors do not tell the readers what the reason is. …show more content…
This quote says, “All right, she told herself. So I’ve killed him.” Just because her husband decided to leave her she killed him, instead of asking why or trying to solve the problem she murdered him. Instead in “Popular Mechanics”, it says, “In this manner, the issue was decided.” This quote does not explain much but this couple was fighting over to keep the baby, and from this quote, the readers can conclude that because they hurt the baby they blamed each other. One more thing both stories have in common is that they are both crimes of passion. In “Popular Mechanics” the parents hurt the baby because they both love and want to keep the baby. Also, the wife in "Lamb to the Slaughter" kill her husband and tries to cover up her crime because she wants to protect her baby and her from getting separated. These are some ways the authors use the same ideas in their
“Lamb to the Slaughter” by Roald Dahl captivates readers as they follow the story of how a loving wife turns into a merciless killer. This passage is told from the point
In conclusion, the women in both stories experienced two very different situations but overall deal with the same things. Selfishness plays a role in their thoughts and actions and unfaithfulness plays a role in the overall happiness in their marriages. With both selfishness and unfaithfulness controlling their thoughts and emotions they become confused and lose all control of the situation. Basically it is shocking to see how lightly affairs are taken into consideration and how the loss of a loved one doesn't affect people, as it should.
Because writing is inherently romantic in nature, throughout the history of literature, we see many authors' insights into the enigmatic and often ambiguous subject of love and relationships. Three short stories penned by three separate American writers deal with such matter: Charlotte Perkins Gillman in "The Yellow Wallpaper", Kate Chopin in "The Storm", and Nathaniel Hawthorne in "Young Goodman Brown." Though the relationships presented in each of these stories are unique in their own persuasion, the same underlying theme runs true in all. At first glance all of these relationships may appear healthy in their existence; however, further introspection uncovers specific maladies which I believe elicit much of the discord which arises within each of these writings. All of the husbands in the aforementioned short stories evoke, though some more subtly than others, varying degrees of conflict.
...eir messages of the stories are the same. So now, just think about why they have many similar thoughts toward women.
Gaitskill’s “Tiny, Smiling Daddy” focuses on the father and his downward spiral of feeling further disconnected with his family, especially his lesbian daughter, whose article on father-daughter relationships stands as the catalyst for the father’s realization that he’d wronged his daughter and destroyed their relationship. Carver’s “What We Talk About When We Talk About Love” focuses on Mel and his attempt to define, compare, and contrast romantic love, while leaving him drunk and confused as he was before. While both of my stories explore how afflicted love traumatizes the psyche and seem to agree that love poses the greatest dilemma in life, and at the same time that it’s the most valued prospect of life, the two stories differ in that frustrated familial love causes Gaitskill's protagonist to become understandable and consequently evokes sympathy from the reader, but on the other hand frustrated romantic love does nothing for Carver's Protagonist, except keep him disconnected from his wife and leaving him unchanged, remaining static as a character and overall unlikable. In comparing “Tiny, Smiling Daddy” and “What We Talk About When We Talk About Love”, together they suggest that familial love is more important than romantic love, which we relentlessly strive to achieve often forgetting that we’ll forever feel alone without familial love, arguably the origin of love itself.
In the essay “Against Honeymoons,” “Sexual paranoia,” and, “Family Tradition” Comey, Kipnis, and Nikolidakis all have one thing in common. Base off what each essay had to say, it is clear to the reader that there are different types of relationships in the world. Some may be worse than other and may all have a different outcome. I relate all three essay through relationships. They all have to deal with some type of relationship and commitment.
Lamb to the Slaughter, by Roald Dahl, instantly grabs a reader’s attention with its grotesque title, ensuing someone’s downfall or failure. The saying “lamb to the slaughter,” usually refers to an innocent person who is ignorantly led to his or her failure. This particular short story describes a betrayal in which how a woman brutally kills her husband after he tells her that he wants a divorce. She then persuades the policemen who rush to the scene to consume the evidence. This action and Patrick’s actions show the theme of betrayal throughout the story which Roald Dahl portrays through the use of point of view, symbolism and black humor.
Both stories show feminism of the woman trying to become free of the male dominance. Unfortunately, the woman are not successful at becoming free. In the end, the two women’s lives are drastically
Humans are incredible creatures, being able to reason, and comprehend. This power also allows them to create false appearances. In Roald Dahl’s “Lamb to the Slaughter”, a jealous stricken wife has to lie out of a murder. In Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game”, a hunter named Rainsford falls off of his boat, and swims to a private island. Meeting a fellow hunter, it becomes clear that this hunter goes for things other than animals. It becomes hunter running from hunter. Both authors suggest that people's appearances can be deceiving.
... get an abortion. Although these two stories use symbolism differently, they are still masterfully created by their authors; and they use symbolism in a way that helps us to grasp what they are trying to convey.
In both of these stories there are certain characteristics of females that are the same, they are inner strength, obedience, honor and respect, the good of the family is better than the good of the individual.
In the two well known stories, “Lamb to the Slaughter” and “The Lady or the Tiger,” both deal with relationships that have gone wrong. The story for “Lamb to the Slaughter,” starts out with Mary Maloney, who is pregnant and sews and waits for her husband to come home everyday. When her husband comes home one day and tells her that he is leaving her, she gets upset and ends up killing him with a frozen lamb leg. By the end of the story she is able to also get away with doing it. As for “The Lady or the Tiger,” this story deals with a King, whose daughter has fallen in love with a man who is not of the same status as she is. When the king finds out of this, he sends him to their version of a court system, which consists of choosing between two doors. One that has a tiger that will kill them and one that has a girl that the man will get to marry. The princess knows which door has each option in it and has the power to tell him which one to choose. Although in the end, the story never actually tells you which one she picks, and leaves it up to you to imagine what she does. Both of these stories have a lot in common, such as dealing with complicated relationships, as well as both of these women end up losing no matter what they choose.
similarities that are inevitably beyond mere coincidence. One could surmise that both of these stories might have a basis in common historical occurrence. However, despite the fact that both of these works discuss a common topic, the portrayal of this event is quite different. Like identical twins raised in different cultures, the expressions of these works are products of their environment.
Another, similarity these two stories have with each other is their themes. They shared powerful themes, such as how control can affect a person, and the insecurities one may have. ...
The two novels prove the claim of the research, which is working on the female characters; and that is why these novels are chosen and made a comparison between them. Both of the writers make their protagonists the victims and from another side send to them the one who will help them to overcome their ordeal. Finally, their life has completely changed and reached what they want.