Compare And Contrast Essay On Shark And Bears

543 Words2 Pages

Bear vs. Shark On a level playing field the bear would prevail because it has many weapons to destroy its prey on multiple surfaces, and they instinctually fish to survive. It’s a known fact that bears not only have mighty paws with razor sharp claws attached onto them, but they also have piercing teeth they use to tear apart any opponent. The bear can independently move both of its paws with ease which allows it to attack the shark from multiple directions. Also, the bear could attempt to stab and grip its rival with its claws and then quickly attempt to bite the shark. By paralyzing the shark with one deep bite in the precise location the bear can quickly destroy the shark. In a matter of a few quick seconds the bear delivers multiple attack with its arsenal of weapons. On the other hand, the shark only has one lethal weapon which are its jagged teeth. This is a disadvantage for the shark because it can only attack its enemy from a single direction. The shark would have to come dangerously close to the bear to attack it effectively. With both …show more content…

Unlike the shark, the bear will not become immobilized outside of its natural environment. In the wild, bears can swim and are not susceptible of drowning. Therefore, if the bear gets into a vulnerable position during the fight, it still will not be completely defenseless. Underwater the bear would still swing its massive paws to attack the shark. However, if the shark gets into a weak position during the battle it will stain itself to survive. If the shark gets taken out of the water, out of its natural habitat, it will become exposed. Above water the shark will immediately be unable to breath, and it will struggle for air. If taken above the water the shark will not be able to guard itself from the bear’s aggressive attacks, and it will surely lose the fight. Bears might not have the greatest

More about Compare And Contrast Essay On Shark And Bears

Open Document