Compare And Contrast Beowulf And Sir Gawain

1121 Words3 Pages

Beowulf and Sir Gawain are both honorable heroic figures of their time. Beowulf, translated by Burton Raffel, and Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, translated by Marie Borroff, are two different poems that tell a story about a very honorable man that takes a quest to achieve his goal. Sir Gawain shows that he is a developing version of Beowulf because he has similar characteristics of Beowulf, he has differences to show that he is not quite an epic hero, and the Romantic societies are a progression of the Epic societies in the attitudes of the people and what is valued in each society. Beowulf and Sir Gawain share similar characteristics. Both of these characters had a goal in mind trying to protect their society. They both showed great loyalty. …show more content…

Beowulf was a warrior who had extremely high self-confidence. Sir Gawain seemed to have lower self-confidence compared to the great Beowulf. For example, when the Green Knight appeared to the homeland of Sir Gawain and King Arthur, Sir Gawain did not instantly approach the Green Knight like Beowulf would have. Sir Gawain waited until he noticed the king was going to trade blows with the Green Knight. After King Arthur stepped up, Sir Gawain did do the honorable thing and take the king’s spot, but it shows the difference in both characters. Many times Beowulf stepped up as soon as he got an opportunity. After the battle with Grendel, Grendel’s mother caused conflict. As soon as Beowulf heard this, he said, “Let your sorrow end! It is better for us all to avenge our friends, not mourn them forever.” Beowulf instantly stepped up to protect the people against Grendel’s mother. He never waited. Sir Gawain also did not seem to have as much pride as Beowulf did either. Sir Gawain cut the head off of the Green Knight so that the Green Knight didn’t get the chance to take a blow at him. Beowulf showed much pride in his battles. For example, Grendel had no weapons, so Beowulf ditched his weapons and destroyed Grendel with his bare hands. Sir Gawain would have used his weapons to do whatever it took to win the battle just like he did whatever it took to win against the Green Knight. Sir Gawain also never fought any monsters or …show more content…

Beowulf lived in a chaotic society with supernatural things going on, while Sir Gawain lived in a more real society. Beowulf lived in a society with monsters and dragons in it. In Beowulf, Beowulf says, “Other monsters crowded around me, continually attacking”. The chaotic society that Beowulf lived in was much different than the society that Sir Gawain lived in. There were no monsters or dragons in Sir Gawain’s society. Both characters also lived in a society that values honor differently. In the poem of Beowulf, the society valued success and glory. In the poem with Sir Gawain in it, society valued if someone did as they were told. A knight was sworn to chivalry and he was honored if he obeyed his king. Because of the different perspectives on honor, these two characters had different motives. Beowulf sought glory and pride while Sir Gawain’s motive was chivalry. Sir Gawain does what’s right because of his moral values and his duties, not for glory and fame. Beowulf wants to live heroically. Sir Gawain just wants to obey his King because that was what was considered honorable in that society. Sir Gawain showed his progression to an epic hero because his society allowed him to have a noble birth, he is capable of deeds of courage, he has potential to be a great knight, he goes on a quest, and he is well respected in his society, but is not recognized nationally like Beowulf

Open Document