Compare And Contrast Auguste And Justinian

776 Words2 Pages

In the center of the Mediterranean lies Italy, one of the most illustrious empires of the time. The Roman Empire refers to the period of time, beginning with Augustus, when Rome was ruled by emperors. There were differences in the political, economic, religious, architectural, and education aspects in the way each ruler ruled. When Augustus transformed the republic into a monarchy, Rome reigned supreme. The era of Augustus, Nero, and Justinian can be compared and contrasted in these aspects.
Augustus founded and ruled the Roman Empire from 63 BC thru 14 AD. The Roman Empire was peaceful under Augustus’ rule. He encouraged architecture and it is said that he ”found Rome of brick and left it of marble”. He encouraged the restoration of temples and buildings …show more content…

Justinian was of a modest origin, and often drew upon counselors and administrators from outside the aristocratic class which caused tension throughout his rule with the Byzantine nobility. Justinian’s policies caused civil unrest in the empire; popular outrage caused the Nika Riot in 532. The riot caused severe damage, resulting in the burning of churches and imperial buildings. As a result of the damage, Justinian was able to do extensive rebuilding of the city. He took strides to initiate architectural achievements and art, employing architects that were skilled in physics, engineering, and mathematics, resulting in revolutionary new designs. Justinian was also responsible for shaping church policies, foreign affairs, art, and architecture. Religion was just as important to Justinian. He took a leading role in the church, extinguishing Greco-Roman Paganism, and coming into direct conflict with the papacy in 543. In foreign affairs, Justinian sought to recover the territory lost to Italy and North Africa, so he was responsible for one of the most aggressive military during medieval

More about Compare And Contrast Auguste And Justinian

Open Document