Compare And Contrast A Vindication Of The Rights Of Women By Mary Wollstonecraft

977 Words2 Pages

During the Enlightenment, prominent intellectuals such as Voltaire, Montesquieu, and Rousseau explored humanity in an age of unprecedented ideas. Their works were characterized by a focus on reason as a means to explore other key topics like progress, secularism, and government. During this same period, philosopher Mary Wollstonecraft produced similarly groundbreaking works. In A Vindication of the Rights of Women, Wollstonecraft relied on the Enlightenment ideals of progress, government, and reason to argue for the equal treatment of women. Wollstonecraft claimed that if reason was correctly applied, the current conditions and rights of women, though unacceptable, were bound to improve. Additionally, Wollstonecraft applied the typical Enlightenment …show more content…

For many Enlightenment thinkers, progress was the “working faith of great vitality” (Ginsberg). Prominent Enlightenment philosopher Marie-Jean de Condorcet theorized that the application of reason means there is “no limit to the perfecting powers of man” (qtd. in Spielvogel 608). Wollstonecraft employed Condocet’s idea that progress was built on reason to push for the equal treatment of women. She stated that “rational creatures” always progress, and “rise in excellence by the exercise of powers implanted for that purpose” (Wollstonecraft). Both Wollstonecraft and other Enlightenment thinkers believed that progress was innately good. Despite the many forces that tempt it otherwise, Enlightenment thinker Voltaire had faith that reason was powerful enough to guide progress in the right direction. Voltaire supported progress, “in spite of all the passions which make war on it, in spite of all the tyrants who would drown it in blood, in spite of the imposters who would annihilate it by superstition” (Ginsberg). Wollstonecraft echoed an equivalent belief in progress. She acknowledged that progress is not always a straight line, and “passions should unfold our reason” (Wollstonecraft). Just like her counterparts, Wollstonecraft recognized that “present evil would produce future good” (Wollstonecraft). Wollstonecraft’s argument for …show more content…

Echoing the popular Enlightenment belief, philosopher Montesquieu urged the population to use “reason to liberate human beings from their prejudices” (Spielvogel 601). Wollstonecraft also claimed that reason holds the power to end prejudices, and felt it “necessary to pursue the course of reason as it has been perplexed and involved in error, by various adventitious circumstances” (Wollstonecraft). Wollstonecraft expanded on Montesquieu’s idea that reason ends prejudices; prejudice is often caused by false reason: “deeply rooted prejudices have clouded reason” (Wollstonecraft). Women were seen as convincingly inferior because of a false use of reason: “Men, in general, seem to employ their reason to justify prejudices . . . . based on partial experiences on just, though, narrow views” (Wollstonecraft). In addition, both Wollstonecraft and philosophers of the time regarded reason as a way to expand knowledge. Reason was believed to lead to growth of the mind: “Our knowledge, then, is derived from our environment, not from heredity; from reason, not from faith” (Spielvogel 600). Wollstonecraft shared a similar sentiment. She affirmed the connection between reason and knowledge: “from the exercise of reason, knowledge, and virtue naturally flow” (Wollstonecraft). Both Wollstonecraft and the Enlightenment thinkers shared a

Open Document