Colonialism in Southeast Asia

720 Words2 Pages

Colonialism in Southeast Asia

6b.Colonialism in Southeast Asia is not only about the restructuring

of local society for the sole aim of economic progress, and not always

with tragic consequences.

It is indeed true that apart from economic incentives, the western

colonialists came to Southeast Asia for political and humanitarian

reasons. Also, colonial rule did always result in tragic outcomes.

The major factor responsible for colonialism in Southeast Asia was

largely political, specifically the growing influence of other western

powers in Southeast Asia. The western powers were aware that while

economic wealth could bring about political influence, political

influence was required to safeguard the latter. Essentially, these two

forces are interdependent on one another. Hence, when it dawned on the

western powers that the economic benefits of trade and commerce in

Southeast Asia were immense, they realised that it was also equally

important to establish political authority in the region. Therefore,

the ‘forward movement’ and the rise of ‘new imperialism’ in the West,

particularly Europe, led to a frenzied rush for colonies, especially

in Southeast Asia. For instance, the British initially adhered to a

policy of non-intervention in Malaya. However, they feared the

prospect of German intervention in the Malaya. After Chancellor

Bismarck reunified Germany in 1871, rumours were rife that the Germans

wanted to secure a naval station in the Pangkor area, as part of their

plans to increase their influence beyond Europe. Thus, to defend their

economic interests, the British switched to a policy of intervention.

The western powers bel...

... middle of paper ...

...distinct, formal and

impartial institutions, clearly defined bureaucratic function,

standard procedures and huge amounts of paper. Western-styled

education and administrative skills were now necessary to for entry

into the government service, which is a contrast to the old

administrative system, which relied on connections and kickbacks. For

instance, In French Indochina, specifically Vietnam, knowledge of the

French language became a prerequisite for admission to the mandarinate

in Tonkin and Annam and in Siam, instead of ascribed rankings, modern

education was the ladder to promotions within government service.

To conclude, although some people claim that colonialism in Southeast

Asia is about the restructuring of local society for the sole aim of

progress, and often results in tragic consequences, I beg to differ.

Open Document