Collective Memory: A Societal Symbolism Perspective

727 Words2 Pages

Collective memory is commonly defined as “shared individual memories” but in the source Collective Memory from a Psychological Perspective, it is better defined as “publicly available symbols maintained by society” (Coman et al.). The article went on to explain how collective memory differs from an individual memory in the sense that “an individual restructures the world” so that one can better remember, whereas in collective memory, the memory is restructured by society. In this case, the photograph from atop Mount Suribachi is most definitely a symbol that has been passed on from person to person, family to family, newspaper to newspaper since the day it was taken. It was printed in papers all over country, used as a means of gathering funds …show more content…

So why not Lowery’s photo? It was patriotic, “perfectly serviceable… a Marine in the foreground holding a rifle… the first flag, snapping in the breeze” (Patterson) as Buell put it in his interview on CNN. But as it was well put in Coman’s article, “collective memories must have a function for society”. Rosenthal’s photo is an “complex… and unstable articulation… open to successive reconstruction by and on behalf of varied political interests, including a public interest” (Hariman, Public Identity); it was “deeply reassuring… in its display of strength and teamwork” and it communicated a push towards victory (Ben-Ghiat). Meaning that, while Lowery’s photo did capture an iconic moment in time, it did not posses the qualities that allowed it to be reconstructed on societies behalf. Simply put, it was not as powerful as the one that people are so familiar with today. Another important aspect of collective memory to consider is the fact that it is not always rainbows and sunshine, there are negatives that also come from these “available …show more content…

Collective memory plays a huge role in this story because as it was looked at earlier, this public, complex, unstable symbol is just a photograph. The story passed on from mouth to mouth is what can be complex and maintained by society. Most people have heard the idiom “bad news travels fast”, well some like to say so does collective memory (not really but for the purpose of this paper let’s go with it). Think about how much more interesting it is to talk about how Joe Rosenthal’s photograph was really staged, and not authentic at all. It’s so much more interesting to gossip about the latest wartime photograph than what is going on in the lives of celebrities anyway. In the journal article on collective memory, it is pointed out that “conversations may promote the formation of a collective memory as much as, if not more than, a textbook, a memorial, a commemoration” (Coman et al.). In the instance of the raising of the flag of Iwo Jima, social contagion, “the spread of a memory – true or false – from person to person through social interaction” (Coman et al.), was just as popular as the printing of the picture. Rumors were circulating all around and in his book “Flag of Our Fathers” John Bradley explains how this myth began to enter the mouths of Americans to begin

Open Document