Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cochlear implant essay
Essays on the cochlear implant
A doctors perspective of cochlear implants
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cochlear implant essay
Consequently, as you can see both hearing aids and cochlear implants have very superlative technology, that they have countless positive effects on many individual lives around the country and are an important contribution for parents to understand these advancements and help their child the best they can. “Hearing loss can impact your work and social life,” says Larocque. “Restoring one’s hearing gives people their life back,” (Donohue 1). A primary benefit of wearing hearing aids or cochlear implants is enhanced directional perception. An individual that hears better in one ear may find it difficult to locate where sounds are coming from because perception is off due to the fact that you are receiving sound of a decreased volume in one …show more content…
For this research paper I interviewed a mom of 2 children, who is 49 years old named Kathy Hilling. Hilling was born with a severe hearing loss in both ears. Hilling even said, “ I was born with a nerve deafness on one side of my ear, so I’ve worn hearing aids my whole life up until last year when I got a cochlear implant on one side,” (Hilling). This means that she a major part of the hearing community, and she is just like all the other individuals who are having the same problem. She loved having hearing aids, and loves having the newest technology of cochlear implants even more. Her mother didn’t know until the age of 2 that she had a hearing loss, when someone noticed she was always distracted in preschool. Hilling even stated, “I wish my mom would’ve known sooner about my hearing, so I could have had early invention and had help with speech and had had the different kinds of developments. I could have received hearing aids at an earlier age,” (Hilling). This has made a major impact on Hilling’s live because if she would’ve gotten hearing aids at an earlier age, her speech would be significantly better. Having hearing aids at a young age, helps a child in school with their education and with speech. Speech therapy is essential to start even prior to a baby even speaking. She even expressed, “If I had the choose to choose between hearing aids and cochlear implants I would go for the cochlear implants because it has changed my life in so many ways,”(Hilling). She has had hearing aids her whole life, but once the hearing aids stopped working, there was nothing she could do except to get a cochlear implant. This has changed her life in so many ways, such as hearing sounds she could not hear prior such cars on the street or the noises of fans
Cochlear implants are amazing feats of biomedical engineering, and have helped many people regain the ability to hear. While there are some ethical dilemmas that go along with them, there is no denying just how amazing these implants really are. By understanding how the ear works, what causes it to stop working, and using science and engineering to fix that problem, there is now a way to give someone a sense they might have never been able to experience. It can be costly, but it could drastically change someone’s life. Some people may say for worse, but there will always be someone else to say it was for better. Overall, cochlear implants are an incredible invention and will continue to grow and only get better with technology.
Lane, Harlan (1992). “Cochlear Implants are Wrong for Young Deaf Children.” Viewpoints on Deafness. Ed. Mervin D. Garretson. National Association of the Deaf, Silver Spring, MD. 89-92.
Many individuals have different views surrounding cochlear implants. Most of the Deaf community tends to be against them whereas most of the hearing community tends to be in favor of them. It is important to understand not only want a cochlear implant is, but how the different communities view the implants so that we can gain a better understanding of Deaf culture.
Cochlear Implants only restore very limited audibility. When described by formerly hearing Deaf people they compare it to hearing underwater, “fuzzy and timbre” yet still able to discern some
She longs to understand her hearing friends and have the ability to hear. Chris’s family, however, has opted to give their deaf son, Peter, a cochlear implant against the wishes of Mari’s Deaf parents and the Deaf community around them who feels it as wrong. Peter and Mari wish to give their deaf son the same opportunities as their hearing child because they are twins. Peter’s family investigates more about the cochlear implant by visiting families who have opted to give their children cochlear implants, but also go and visit the Maryland School for the Deaf to explore all sides of the argument. All the while, Heather’s father is against the idea, Heather’s mother is supportive at first but then changes her mind. Heather’s grandparents fight for Heather’s choice to receive the implant, but ultimately, the family decided that it wasn’t the right
I chose to do my paper on the movie Sweet Nothing in My Ear. The movie was about a child who was born hearing and ended up going deaf, so his parents had to deliberate on whether or not they wanted to get him a cochlear implant. The wife Laura (played by Marlee Matlin) is deaf and her husband Dan is hearing. The movie is centered around Laura and Dan’s struggle to decide if a cochlear implant is what’s best for their son Adam. It doesn’t help Laura make the decision when her parents are both deaf, and her father is basically prejudiced against the hearing culture.
A hearing loss can present many obstacles in one's life. I have faced many issues throughout my life, many of which affected me deeply. When I first realized that I was hearing-impaired, I didn't know what it meant. As I grew older, I came to understand why I was different from everyone. It was hard to like myself or feel good about myself because I was often teased. However, I started to change my attitude and see that wearing hearing aids was no different than people wearing glasses to see.
What I found most interesting about Jarashow’s presentation were the two opposing views: Deaf culture versus medical professionals. Within the Deaf culture, they want to preserve their language and identity. The Deaf community wants to flourish and grow and do not view being deaf as a disability or being wrong. Jarashow stated that the medical field labels Deaf people as having a handicap or being disabled because they cannot hear. Those who are Deaf feel as though medical professionals are trying to eliminate them and relate it to eugenics. It is perceived that those in that field are trying to fix those who are Deaf and eliminate them by making them conform to a hearing world. Those within the Deaf community seem to be unhappy with devices such
From a deafness-as-defect mindset, many well-meaning hearing doctors, audiologists, and teachers work passionately to make deaf children speak; to make these children "un-deaf." They try hearing aids, lip-reading, speech coaches, and surgical implants. In the meantime, many deaf children grow out of the crucial language acquisition phase. They become disabled by people who are anxious to make them "normal." Their lack of language, not of hearing, becomes their most severe handicap. While I support any method that works to give a child a richer life, I think a system which focuses on abilities rather than deficiencies is far more valuable. Deaf people have taught me that a lack of hearing need not be disabling. In fact, it shouldn?t be considered a lack at all. As a h...
The Deaf Community commonly interprets the prompt nature of early implantation as slowly eradicating their culture and community. The Cochlear Implant usually gets its best results in young patients due to the development of hearing going hand-in-hand with the reintroduction of sound in the subject. This, although scientifically proven, is still very much seen as an affront to the Deaf society due to the widespread forcing of it upon the young, rather than having them develop and make their own decision. While many deaf people have been well on the way to recovery with the implant, many others shed it and embrace the culture proper and continue speaking in ASL. This all depends on the time they were implanted and what kind of parents they have. The debate is very heated on this topic, the hardcore enthusiasts of Deaf Culture continuing to shun it and those who put them onto their children, while those who support it continue to support it and help it advance further forward. The implant in the end, is the most popular choice for those who are candidates that either used to be hearing or are the children of hearing parents, while those who are deaf and prefer to stay that way mostly choose to stay
The deaf community does not see their hearing impairment as a disability but as a culture which includes a history of discrimination, racial prejudice, and segregation. According to an online transcript,“Through Deaf Eyes” (Weta and Florentine films/Hott productions Inc., 2007) there are thirty-five million Americans that are hard of hearing. Out of the thirty-five million an estimated 300,000 people are completely deaf. There are ninety percent of deaf people who have hearing parents (Halpern, C., 1996). Also, most deaf parents have hearing children. With this being the exemplification, deaf people communicate on a more intimate and significant level with hearing people all their lives. “Deaf people can be found in every ethnic group, every region, and every economic class” (Weta and Florentine films/Hott productions Inc., 2007). The deaf culture and hard of hearing have plenty of arguments and divisions with living in a hearing world without sound however, that absence will be a starting point of an identity within their culture as well as the hearing culture (Weta and Florentine films/Hott productions Inc., 2007).
While the idea of human tracking has its share of benefits, there certainly are numerous pitfalls that also exist. While the ability to identify someone with an ID tag may have practical uses, the security and privacy issues could seem potentially alarming to some. Not only that, a closer look may show that the technology doesn’t necessarily offer very many advantages when considering the costs of nation-wide adoption of the technology. This paper will try to investigate into these issues, whilst attempt to come up with some solutions.
Today’s society consists of numerous individuals who are diagnosed with disabilities that prevent them from partaking in their everyday tasks. Not everyone gets the chance to live a normal life because they might have a problem or sickness that they have to overcome. Deafness is a disability that enables people to hear. All deafness is not alike; it can range in many different forms. Some people like Gauvin, can be helped with a hearing aid, but some can’t because of their situation and health reasons. In society, hearing individuals consider deafness a disability, while the deaf themselves see it as a cultural significance. In the article “Victims from Birth”, appearing in ifemnists.com, Founding Editor Wendy McElroy, provides the story of
Then, when I was three years old, I had surgery to get a cochlear implant at the University of Minnesota. A cochlear implant is a small device which bypasses the damaged parts of the ear and directly stimulates the auditory nerve. Signals generated by the implant are sent by the auditory nerve to the brain, which recognizes t...
As the complexity and convenience of technology increases, some of the new advancements such as microchip implant for humans and animals can be very controversial. At first, the implants may seem to have benefits, but in the long run they will actually cause more trouble than they are worth. These potential "troublemakers" are about the size of an elongated grain of rice and are injected into the skin under the arm or hand (Feder, Zeller 15). The chip is not powered by a battery and there is nothing that can possibly leak out into the body (Posada-Swafford 8). An early form of this technology was used to monitor salmon and has been used for other wildlife research (Verhovek 5).