Clubbing Case Study

1103 Words3 Pages

Introduction
In late modern Western societies, clubbing is a central activity for young people’s life. It appeals to large groups of young people, which is seen as a way of maintaining one’s group of friends or celebrating the end of the working week (Parker and Willams, cited in Raven, 2012). Through the data of the Home Office publication Safe Clubbing, an approximated four million young people each week goes clubbing in the UK (Webster et al., cited in Sanders, 2005). Clubbing has frequently been associated with drug-taking. The research article is focus on the particular drugs, such as ecstasy, and specific groups, such as bouncers and punters. There might be no formal hypothesis in the article, and the purpose of the study might be to …show more content…

Past research on the concept of normalized recreation drug use has generally applied to young people. Parker and colleagues suggested that normalization does not mean drug use is a ‘ normal’ activity, instead, it means that the use of specific drugs has come to be expected as ‘‘ordinary’ and not necessarily ‘deviant’’.2 It is stated that the characteristics of normalization on drug using are its availability, the frequency of use, the social acceptability and supportive cultural references.2
Furthermore, it is indicated by Hobbs that club culture may consist of many smaller cultures and bouncer culture is one of the fundamental parts.2 Although bouncer culture discussed in the article is similar club culture, it is more like a fragmented series of interacting cultures, such as drug culture and dance culture.5 These theories of culture are necessary to interpret the question of drug selling and regulating at Sam’s club. …show more content…

The researcher himself completely participate as a security guard in a London nightclub, ‘Sam’s Club’. He interviewed deeply with a bar manger and seven bouncers at the club.5 Unlike approaches stressing nominal definition and measurement, participant observation emphasizes real definitions and multiple indicators of key concepts. Dependable and trustworthy results are a fundamental concern, and in the research, participant observation results in highly validity, while the ‘internal reliability’ is questioned.3 The findings of the participant observation might be influenced by subjectivity. One-to-one interviews might be more reliable and valid in this research. Whereas, the research data are limited due to the closed nature of managers and transient nature of staffs that lead to hindering access to the core information. The researcher change this situation after several nights of ‘doing nothing’.4 Although the methodology has some limitations, it is reasonable for the researcher to choose this particular method. This is because observers have access to much more material than other researchers who use the other approach. The researcher might share his life in the club more freely with insiders. Participants who know they are being observed always act unnaturally that might influence the

Open Document