Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Challenges of life
Essay the challenges of life today
Challenges of life
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Looking Into Our Future's Hands
In every aspect of our lives we have a choice that can determine our dishonorable effort or the ability to become expertise. However, we all stick in the same identical path known as our religious beliefs that tell us who our creator truly is by scripture. Scientific theories will never apprehend the way we support our day to day lives, case in point, the creature can be exceeding or unfavorable in any emotional point of view coming upon a human. Victor Frankenstein took on the challenge to create a masterpiece to only look beastly upon everyone's eyes, after all, that was not the case when the creature arose beneath him. Scientists establish a new way of creating, such as cloning or in the world of genetic engineering,
…show more content…
Victor had several moral choices to select on, which is to play with God and create a human like figure, or forbid natural philosophy and walk along a new journey. However, Victor chooses to create a new creature not thinking it would need to be cherished or loved by his own father. Victor made the creature with love and passion, but just like every single newborn baby, it needs its parents there to support and show emotional relations. The creature responds with, "This obligation is in part to be just to me, and do what you can as father to improve my lot." (Shelley 164). Creating a companion or not for the creature, Victor needs to prove his passion and emotions he has for his creation. Although, he forbids Frankenstein's obligation which changes the moral of the story to conquer revenge …show more content…
His act of science would question if cloning was a practical and morally acceptable thing to do. Firstly, even attempting to clone insults God's role as a creator. Showing full determination, Aldona says, "Christian, however, feel that we have no right to play the role of God, because He is the only one Creator and act of creation depends on Him." (Zbikowska 13-16). We know God's role is to create men, women, animals and nature in his image in the way he sees perfect, not the way we see ourselves as perfect. God has the intention of making us, and when others try to mimic him it deteriorates his role in the world. Aside from the idea that cloning is insulting to God, it can also hurt others. Even though cloning has been developing for the past few decades, it is still a fairly unsuccessful procedure. In most cases, cloning is successful only less than one percent of the time. Moreover, successful clones often have problems with their body and are subject to a short lifespan ridden with health problems. This hurts the person or animal cloned rather than to help them, making cloning an immoral
Acting as a hypocrite Victor explains how parents should be there to teach you to become great ,“ The innocent and helpless creature bestowed on them by heaven, whom to bring up to good, and whose future lot it was in their hands to direct to happiness or misery, according as the fulfilled heir duties towards me” (Shelley 16) Victor says that his parents are a big role on how their child turns out; if the parents treat you bad then the child will come out bad but if he learns from good then he will come out to be a perfect little angel. Not taking his own advice, Victor abandon the creature to suffer life for himself. After months of looking for Victor, the creature in need of companionship says ”I, the miserable and the abandoned, am an abortion, to be spuned at, and kicked, and trampled on.”(Shelley 165) He journeyed on his own looking for companionship, no one liked him and to top it off reading Victor’s journal just made him feel even as bad as before. So he then looks for victor and asks if he can create another but victor thought to himself and says “I thought with a sensation of madness on my promise of creating another like to him, and trembling with passion, torn to pieces the thing on which I was engaged.” (Shelley 124 )Victor making the decision to not make another made the creature furious but Victor had his reasons like what if the creatures create more what if he doesn’t leave him alone just what ifs. He worries about making another creature because he wonders if the female would be as bad as the creature he first created. Victor does not make the second creature and tore it apart. Abandoning the creature caused him to learn for himself. This turns out horrible and makes the creature need a companion and goes on a
The Consequences of Cloning In her novel Frankenstein, Mary Shelley forewarns her audience about the consequences we face if we do not take responsibility for our actions through Victor Frankenstein’s actions. In the beginning of the novel, Victor desires fame from discovering new knowledge of the world, which leads him to create the creature whom he neglects. The neglect from its creator leads the creature to resent the Frankenstein family and ultimately murder them. Due to his lack of responsibility as the creator of the creature, Victor is punished by having to watch his loved ones die off one by one. Reflecting on the consequences of Victor’s irresponsibility, human cloning brings concern because of the ethicality of the act.
As a tragic hero, Victor’s tragedies begin with his overly obsessive thirst for knowledge. Throughout his life, Victor has always been looking for new things to learn in the areas of science and philosophy. He goes so far with his knowledge that he ends up creating a living creature. Victor has extremely high expectations for his creation but is highly disappointed with the outcome. He says, “I had desired it with an ardour that far exceeded moderation; but now that I had finished, the beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart” (Shelley 35). Frankenstein neglects the creature because of his horrifying looks, which spark the beginning of numerous conflicts and tragedies. At this point, the creature becomes a monster because of Victor’s neglect and irresponsibility. The monster is forced to learn to survive on his own, without anyone or anything to guide him along the way. Plus, the monster’s ugly looks cause society to turn against him, ad...
“I [Victor] was partly urged by curiosity, and compassion confirmed my resolution” (Shelley 95). Once the Creature has told his tale they begin to discuss the creation of a companion for him. That Creature states “[m]y vices are the children of a forced solitude that I abhor; and my virtues when I live in communion with an equal. I shall feel the affections of a sensitive being, and become linked to the chain of existence and events, from which I am now excluded” (Shelley 130). Victor agrees and decides to help him by creating a companion for him, however he is unsure if this is the right thing to do.
As previously mentioned, Victor’s childhood was full of parental support, and even included his parents “adopting” another child into their home (Shelley 35). The creature’s “parent” Victor, abandons him, leaves him to fend for himself, which results in the creature feeling angry toward Victor. The creature had a resentful, distant relationship with his creator, while Victor’s upbringing could not have been more different. Shelley uses the story of Victor’s childhood; the adoption of Elizabeth, the stories of the De Lacey children to compare to the creature and the “upbringing” Victor is denying him. The opposition in parenthood is displayed between Victor and the creature are displayed by the way Shelley writes the creature’s last quotes after Victor’s death “Once I had falsely hoped to meet with beings who, pardoning my outward form, would love me for the excellent qualities I was capable of unfolding” (Shelley 239). The opposition lies in the monumental difference in parenting between Alphonse and Caroline Frankenstein, and Victor Frankenstein. Perhaps if the creature had been cared for more adequately, the story would’ve ended much
Although the Creature later went on to commit crimes, he was not instinctively bad. Victor’s Creature was brought into this world with a child-like innocence. He was abandoned at birth and left to learn about life on his own. After first seeing his creation, Victor “escaped and rushed downstairs.” (Frankenstein, 59) A Creator has the duty to teach his Creature about life, as well as to love and nurture him. However, Victor did not do any of these; he did not take responsibility for his creature. One of the first things that the creature speaks of is that he was a “poor, helpless, miserable wretch; I knew, and could distinguish, nothing; but feeling pain invade me on all sides, (he) sat ...
In order to strongly argue against cloning, there must be an understanding of its process and what exactly it is. Simply stated, a clone is a duplicate just like a photocopy. A good example of such “copies” that occur are identical twins, which are duplicates of each other. “The first step of DNA cloning is to isolate a complete gene and is to chromosomal sequences and then to gradually begin flaking the chromosomal sequences of a single DAN molecule. Then the DNA clone can be electronically labeled and used as a probe to isolate the chromosomal sequences from a collection of different types of genes, which should contain cloned sequences that would represent the whole gene. This action will produce new sets of cloned cells identical to the mother cell. The new set of cells are isolated and likewise the simplified process is repeated all over again until the cells form a complete organ. In order to produce a complete organism the DNA must be altered in a variety of way to come out with the finished product to be the complete organism.” In simple terms, a cell is taken from a donor woman. Then an unfertilized egg is taken from a second woman. The DNA from the cell is removed and transferred to the egg. The egg is then implanted into a surrogate mother. The resulting baby is genetically identical to the original donor.
He was raised peacefully which can be seen when he says, “No human being could have passed a happier childhood than myself. My parents were possessed by the very spirit of kindness and indulgence” (Shelley, 32). However, he abandons his family to explore unknown powers and teach all of humanity about the deepest mysteries of life, but his pride as well as his arrogance bring an end to his innocence. When Victor makes the creature, he disregards all ethics and his morals. Victor’s zeal to create a living being commences a cycle that ends up destroying himself, his family, and his creature. Only when the creature wakes does Victor have regrets. He says,
This logic and pure scientific rationalism is drastically changed after the failure and the creation of the monster. Frankenstein is disillusioned and claims that he can really create something. Though, the choice whether this creation will be prone to bad or to good nature is after nature, God, or fate (Shelley 239).
With his first creation living a miserable and isolated life, he requests Victor to make him a wife that he could live a happier life with. Victor agrees to make his first creation a wife, but he ends up breaking this promise as he ends up destroying the 2nd creation: due to his fear of the consequences that could arise from it. This angers the Creature, who believes that Victor, as creator, is responsible for the well-being of his creation. The Creature then begins to kill everyone that is close to Victor, making his creator’s life as miserable and lonely as his. If a creator doesn’t look after its creation, the creation will suffer and backfire on its creator. What Mary Shelley is trying to portray from this is the importance of parental responsibility and nurture. When children are born, their parents take on the responsibility for nurturing and raising the child until they are old enough to become released into the real world. In one of their first encounters, the Creature attempts to communicate with his creator by reaching with his hand, grinning, and attempting to talk. Victor then abandons his creation and leaves it to fend for itself and discover the world in a total alien-like manner. This causes the Creature to have to fend for himself and self-educate. Later on, the Creature approaches Victor and demands him to listen to his
Last of all, Cloning is not ethical, many religious groups look down upon cloning and think it’s not proper because they think it’s like playing God. Many scientists were mainly thinking about cloning animals and, most likely, humans in the future to harvest their organs and then kill them. “Who would actually like to be harvested and killed for their organs?” “Human cloning exploits human beings for our own self-gratification (Dodson, 2003).” A person paying enough money could get a corrupt scientist to clone anybody they wanted, like movie stars, music stars, athletes, etc (Andrea Castro 2005),” whether it be our desire for new medical treatments or our desire to have children on our own genetic terms (Dodson, 2003).
If a pet is cloned it will not act the same as it did before it was cloned. The pet could have been very gentle but after it was cloned it could be very agresive. Also cloning won’t get rid of any genetic deseases. It also won’t get rid of any deformities. Why cloning a pet is wrong.
However, “The key ethical issue with therapeutic cloning is the moral status of the cloned embryo, which is created solely for destruction. The ethical issues with reproductive cloning include genetic damage to the clone, health risks to the mother, very low success rate meaning loss of large numbers of embryos and fetuses, psychological harm to the clone, complex altered familial relationships, and commodification of human life.” (Cloning, 2013) Although we may be helping people here on earth who are in need of certain bodily organs just like any medical procedure it includes several risks. It is also fairly new and few if any cases of attempting to clone humans has been
People have always marvelled upon the idea of having their own clone. A clone may be able to do your homework, chores, or fill in for you at the office without anyone suspecting a thing. Sounds like a fun idea to have a clone, right? But what are the reasons that the sciences of cloning would be a bad idea, and should in fact be banned? Proponents of cloning overlook ethical issues; however, the benefits do not outweigh these concerns because people worry about humans being unique, copies of people can be created without a person’s permission, people wouldn’t be able to distinguish between a clone and original.
Many of the unethical aspects of human clones can be seen for animals. Animals are intelligent creatures who are capable of emotion and feel pain just like humans. In addition, it is proven that cloned animals face many more hardships, such as early deaths, premature births, tumors, organ defects, miscarriages and much more. If we find these unacceptable for humans, why should animals go through this? But lets look on the practical side of this too. Although animal cloning is not out of the ordinary any more, it is extremely expensive and difficult to produce a clone. “The Center for Food Safety claims that over 90 percent of cloning attempts fail.” (Driscoll, Griswold 1) Even Dolly, “took over 250 attempts to succeed, and in the end, she lived only half as long as normal sheep.” (Driscoll, Griswold 1) So why would you use it for livestock when the clone would end up costing more than the meat? Another reason why clones may be used is to produce desired traits in race horses and pets. Instead of cloning, breed two animals with the desired traits to get an equal, if not better results. If animals are continued to be cloned, they remain all the same, none will be unique and there will be no improvements. If they are bred, then it will keep the diversity and the generations will have to capacity to exceed the one before. To continue on the note of diversity, diversity is essential for the survival of any species. Without it, an entire species could be wiped out from a single virus that none of the animals have immunity to, or if there was an environmental shift, none would have the traits needed to survive the new surrounding. This issue is not as clear with animals as it is with humans. About 64% of people believe that animal cloning is morally wrong. (Lyons 2) Although this is still a majority, it is a drastic difference from the 90% that are against human